Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:25:23.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Parasitic Worms from Arapaima gigas (Teleostean Fish) with a description of Philometra senticosa n.sp. (Filarioidea)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. A. Baylis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The “Arapaima,” “Pirarucú” or “Pirá-Urucú,” of the large rivers of Brazil and the Guianas is the largest strictly freshwater fish known. It is said to reach a length of 15 feet, and a weight of more than 400 lbs. It is known to science under the name of Arapaima gigas (Cuvier).

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 1927 , pp. 35 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baylis, H. A. and Daubney, R. (1926). A Synopsis of the Families and Genera of Nematoda. London (British Museum (Nat. Hist.)).Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. and Lane, C. (1920). A Revision of the Nematode Family Gnathostomidae. Proc. Zool. Soc. pp. 245–310, Pls. I–VIII.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, K. M. (1839). Neue Gattungen von Binnenwürmern, etc Ann. Wien. Mus. Naturg. II. 219–242, Pls. XIV–XX.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. (1850). Systema Helminthum. Vol. I.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. (1851). Systema Helminthum. Vol. II.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. (1855). Neunzehn Arten von Trematoden. Denkschr. k. Akad. Wiss., Wien, X. 1, 59–70, Pls. I–III.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. (1856). Zwölf Arten von Acanthocephalen. Denkschr. k. Akad. Wiss. XI. 1, 275–290, Pls. I–III.Google Scholar
Drasche, R. Von. (1884). Revision der in der Nematoden-Sammlung des k.k. zoologischen Hofcabinetes befindliehen Original-Exemplare Diesing's und Molin's. Verh. k.k. zool.-bot. Oes. Wien, XXXIII. 107–118, Pls. III–V.Google Scholar
Ferreira, A. R. (1903). Memoria sobre o Peixe Pirá-Urucú. Arch. Mus. Nac., Rio de Janeiro, XII. 155–158.Google Scholar
Janicki, C. Von (1908). Über den Bau von Amphilina liguloidea Diesing. Zeitschr. f. iviss. Zool. LXXXIX. 4, 568–597, Pls. XXXIV and XXXV.Google Scholar
Monticelli, F. S. (1892). Appunti sui Cestodaria. Atti r. Accad. Sci.fis. e mat. Napoli (2), V, Art. 6.Google Scholar
Poche, F. (1922). Zur Kenntnis der Amphilnidea. Zool. Anz. LIV. 11/13, 276–287.Google Scholar
Poche, F. (1926). Das System der Platodaria. Arch. f. Naturg. Abt. A, XCI. 2/3, 1–459, Pls. I–VII.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. and Henry, A. (1915 a). Sur les Nématodes du genre Goezia Zeder. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. Paris, VIII. 5, 270–274.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. and Henry, A. (1915 b). Sur les Nématodes du genre Camallanus Raill. et Henry, 1915 (Cucullanus Auct., non Mueller, 1777). Bull. Soc. Path. exot. Paris, VIII. 7, 446–452.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1896). II Genere Ascaris Linné. Lavoro monografico. Boll. Soc. Adriat. Set. Nat. Trieste, XVII. 9–120.Google Scholar
Travassos, L. (1920). Um novo Tipo de Acantocefalo. Rev. Soc. Brasil. Sci. No. 3, 209–215.Google Scholar
Travassos, L. (1926). Contribuições para o Conhecimento da Fauna helminthologica brasileira, XX. Revisão dos Acanthocephalos brasileiros. Parte II. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, XIX, 1, 31–125, Pls. III–XXVI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cleave, H. J. (1920). Two new Genera and Species of Acanthocephalous Worms from Venezuelan Fishes. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. LVIII. 455–466, Pls. XXVII and XXVIII.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F. (1923). On some remarkable new Forms of Caryophyllaeidae from the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, and a Revision of the Families of Cestodaria. Quart. Journ. Microsc. Sci. LXVII. iii. 435–472. Pls. XXIV and XXV.Google Scholar