Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:34:07.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal variations in the incidence and development of the cestode Proteocephalus filicollis (rud. 1810) in Gasterosteus aculeatus (L. 1766)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. A. Hopkins
C. A. Hopkins
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University, Glasgow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The incidence, intensity of infection, rate of growth and genital development in Proteocephalus filicollis has been studied by the monthly examination of approximately 60 Gasterosteus aculeatus over a period of 2 years.

2. The existence of an annual cycle, commonly reported for cestode parasites of fish in a temperate climate, is clearly established. The most advanced stages commonly occurring are: plerocercoids (0·25–5mm.) July-November; strobilate worms with genital primordia (58mm.) December-April; mature worms (1 cm.) April-May; gravid (2 cm.) June-July.

3. No tissue phase occurs between the time the procercoid is swallowed and the mature worm develops, but there is a migration from the rectum to the anterior part of the intestine.

4. From a consideration of the seasonal variation in incidence it is deduced that the parasitic population is in dynamic balance and that approximately 1 % of worms present are lost daily.

5. No evidence to support the existence of immunity was found. The lower incidence in 1+ than in 0+ fish was attributed to feeding habits.

6. Other aspects discussed are the interrelationship of proglottid formation and appearance of genital rudiments; the structure of the egg-shell; and the intensity of infection of Cyclops with procercoids as calculated from the numerical distribution of worms in the fish host.

7. Reference is made to intercurrent helminth and protozoan infections and the effect of an epidemic of Ichthyophthirius sp. on the fish population.

I wish to thank Prof. C. M. Yonge for granting every facility for this work. My thanks are also due to Mr Archer, Miss Bell, Mr Berrie, Miss Spence and Miss Wyllie for help in collecting fish, and to Mr Gray who showed me the lochan.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 49 , Issue 3-4 , November 1959 , pp. 529 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Al-Hussaini, A. H. (1949). On the functional morphology of the alimentary tract of some fish in relation to differences in their feeding habits: cytology and physiology. Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 90, 323–54.Google Scholar
Archer, D. M. & Hopkins, C. A. (1958). Studies on cestode metabolism. III. Growth pattern of Diphyllobothrium sp. in a definitive host. Exp. Parasitol. 7, 125–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrington, E. J. W. (1957). The alimentary canal and digestion. In: The Physiology of Fishes, pp. 109–62. Ed. Brown, M. E., N.Y.: Academic Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, R. S. (1953). A study of the seasonal cycle of a proteocephalan cestode, Proteocephalus stizostethi Hunter & Bangham, found in the yellow pikeperch, Stizostedion vitreum vitreum (Mitchill). J. Parasit. 39, 621–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekbaum, E. (1937). On the maturation and the hatching of the eggs of the cestode Triaenophorus crassus Forel from Canadian fish. J. Parasit. 23, 293–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essex, H. E. (1927). The structure and development of Coralloboihrium. Illinois Biol. Monogr. 11, 255–328.Google Scholar
Haderlie, E. C. (1953). Parasites of the fresh-water fishes of Northern California. Publ. Univ. Calif. Zool. 57, 302–439.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. W. (1928). Contributions to the life-history of Proteocephalus ambloplitis (Leidy). J. Parasit. 14, 229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, G. W. (1929). Life-history studies on Proteocephalus pinguis La Rue. Parasitology, 21, 487–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johri, L. N. & Smyth, J. D. (1956). A histochemical approach to the study of helminth morphology. Parasitology, 46, 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meggitt, F. J. (1914). The structure and life-history of a tapeworm (Ichthyotaenia filicollis Rud.) parasitic in the stickleback. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 113–38.Google Scholar
Miller, R. B. (1943). Studies on Cestodes of the genus Triaenophorus from fish of lesser Slave Lake, Alberta. I. Introduction and the life of Triaenophorus crassus Forel and T. nodulosus (Pallas) in the definitive host, Esox lucius. Canad. J. Res. D, 21, 160–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neiland, K. A. (1952). A new species of Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda), with notes on its life-history. J. Parasit. 38, 540–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, J. D. (1952). Studies on tapeworm physiology. VI. Effect of temperature on the maturation in vitro of Schistocephalus solidus. J. Exp. Biol. 29, 304–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1956). Studies on tapeworm physiology. IX. A histochemical study of eggshell formation in Schistocephalus solidus (Pseudophyllidae). Exp. Parasit. 5, 519–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, E. D. (1953). A new species of Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda), with notes on its life-history. Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 72, 364–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, E. D. (1954). The life-history of Proteocephalus tumidocollus Wagner, 1953 (Cestoda), in rainbow trout. J. Parasit. 40, 489–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wardle, R. A. & McLeod, J. A. (1952). The Zoology of Tapeworms. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar