Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:40:52.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rohdella siamensis gen. et sp.nov. (Aspidogastridae: Rohdellinae subfam.nov.) from fresh water fishes in Thailand, with a reorganization of the classification of the subclass Aspidogastrea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

D. I. Gibson  and
S. Chinabut
D. I. Gibson
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 5BD and National Inland Fisheries Institute, Kasetsart University Campus, Bangken, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
S. Chinabut
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 5BD and National Inland Fisheries Institute, Kasetsart University Campus, Bangken, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Rohdella siamensis, a new genus and species of aspidogastrean, is described from freshwater fishes in Thailand. A new subfamily, the Rohdellinae, is erected to accommodate this worm on the grounds that it differs from all known aspidogastreans in that the male and female ducts unite to form an hermaphroditic duct, with the result that the intromittent organ is a sinus-organ and not a cirrus. A new classification of the subclass Aspidogastrea is presented. Two orders are recognized: the Aspidogastrida, containing a single family, the Aspidogastridae, which in turn contains 3 subfamilies, the Aspidogastrinae, the Cotylaspidinae and the Rohdellinae subfam.nov.; and the Stychocotylida ord.nov., containing 3 families, the Stichocotylidae, the Multicalycidae fam.nov. and the Rugogastridae. The systematic position of the Stichocotylida, and especially the Rugogastridae, is commented upon.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 88 , Issue 3 , June 1984 , pp. 383 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baer, J. & Joyeux, C. (1961). Classe de trématodes (Trematoda Rudolphi). In Traité de Zoologie (ed. Grassé, P.-P.). 4, 561–692. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Bakke, T. A. (1976). Shape, size and surface topography of genital organs of Leucochloridium sp. (Digenea), revealed by light and scanning electron microscopy. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 51, 99–113.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S. (1954). Studies on the trematode fauna of India. Part II. Subclass Aspidogastrea. Records of the Indian Museum 51, 209–30.Google Scholar
Colbert, E. H. (1955). Evolution of the Vertebrates. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. & Crompton, D. W. T. (1982). The origins and evolution of the Acanthocephala. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 57, 85–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollfus, R. P. (1958). Cours d'helminthologie. I. Trematodes. Subclass Aspidogastrea. Annales de Parasitologie humaine et comparée 33, 305–95.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. I. (1979). Materials and methods in helminth alpha-taxonomy. Parasitology 79, 36.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. I. (1980). Evolution of digeneans. In Evolution of Helminths (Workshop 13, EMOP 3, ed. Willmott, S.). Parasitology 83 (4), 161–3.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. I. (1983). Some comments on the systematics of the Aspidogastrea. Parasitology 87, 8.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. I. & Bray, R. A. (1979). The Hemiuroidea: terminology, systematics and evolution. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology 36, 35–146.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, K. (1964). Stichocotyle nephropis Cunningham, 1887 (Trematoda) in Scottish waters. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (13th series) 6, 505–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poche, F. (1907). Bemerkungen zur Nomenclatur der Trematoden. Zoologischer Anzeiger 31, 124–6.Google Scholar
Rohde, K. (1971). Untersuchungen an Multicotyle purvisi Dawes, 1941 (Trematoda: Aspidogastrea). I. Entwicklung und Morphologie. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Anatomie 88, 138–87.Google Scholar
Rohde, K. (1973). Structure and development of Lobatostoma manteri sp.nov. (Trematoda: Aspidogastrea) from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Parasitology 66, 63–83.Google Scholar
Schell, S. C. (1973). Rugogaster hydrolagi gen. et. sp.n. (Trematoda: Aspidobothrea: Rugogastridae fam.n.) from the ratfish, Hydrolagus colliei (Lay & Bennett, 1839). Journal of Parasitology 59, 803–5.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G. D. & Roberts, L. S. (1977). Foundations of Parasitology. Saint Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H. W. (1962). Taeniocotyle nom. nov. for Macraspis Olsson, 1869, preoccupied, and systematic position of the Aspidobothrea. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory Woods Hole 122, 137–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symonds, D. J. (1972). Infestation of Nephrops norvegicus (L.) by Stichocotyle nephropis Cunningham in British waters. Journal of Natural History 6, 423–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Z. & Tang, C. (1980). Life histories of two species of aspidogastrids and the phylogeny of the group. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 7, 153–74. (In Chinese and English.)Google Scholar
Timofeeva, T. A. (1975). On the evolution and phylogeny of the aspidogastrids. Parazitologiya 9, 105–11. (In Russian.)Google ScholarPubMed
Yamaguti, S. (1963). Monogenea and Aspidocotylea. In Systema Helminthum, vol. 4. New York and London: Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Young, J. Z. (1962). The Life of Vertebrates, 2nd Edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar