Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:18:55.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Robinia aurata n. g., n. sp. (Digenea: Hemiuridae) from the mugilid Liza aurata with a molecular confirmation of its position within the Hemiuroidea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

P. PANKOV
Affiliation:
Central Laboratory of General Ecology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2 Gagarin Street, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
B. L. WEBSTER
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK
I. BLASCO-COSTA
Affiliation:
Marine Zoology Unit, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, PO Box 22 085, 46071 Valencia, Spain
D. I. GIBSON
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK
D. T. J. LITTLEWOOD
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK
J. A. BALBUENA
Affiliation:
Marine Zoology Unit, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, PO Box 22 085, 46071 Valencia, Spain
A. KOSTADINOVA
Affiliation:
Central Laboratory of General Ecology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2 Gagarin Street, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria

Abstract

Robinia aurata n. g., n. sp. is described from Liza aurata (Mugilidae), the golden grey mullet, from the Ebro Delta, Spanish Mediterranean. The new genus differs from all other hemiurid genera in the combined possession of muscular flanges and a vestigial ecsoma. Within the Bunocotylinae, which currently accommodates 2 genera, Bunocotyle and Saturnius, the new genus exhibits a unique combination of blind caeca, Juel's organ, post-ovarian bulk of the uterus in the hind-body, and tegumental papillae surrounding the oral and ventral sucker apertures. Furthermore, Robinia n. g. differs from both Bunocotyle and Saturnius in the nature of the muscular extensions around the oral sucker, with the shape of a muscular belt in the latter and numerous muscular papillae in the former. The phylogenetic hypothesis for the Bunocotylinae developed from sequence data analyses based on partial lsrDNA and complete ssrDNA combined (22 species) and V4 domain of the ssrRNA gene (37 species) supports the erection of the new genus and confirms its position within the Hemiuroidea. Both molecular analyses confirmed the monophyly of the Hemiuroidea, its division into 2 major clades and the polyphyly of the Derogenidae, as in previous studies, and suggest that the Gonocercinae (with 2 genera, Gonocerca and Hemipera), may require a distinct familial status. Finally, there was poor support for the distinct status of the Lecithasteridae and Hemiuridae, following previous suggestions based on different sequence data sets. A key to genera of the Bunocotylinae is presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blair, D., Bray, R. A. and Barker, S. C. ( 1998). Molecules and morphology in phylogenetic studies of the Hemiuroidea (Digenea: Trematoda: Platyhelminthes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9, 1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasco-Costa, I., Pankov, P., Gibson, D. I., Balbuena, J. A., Raga, J. A., Sarabeev, V. L. and Kostadinova, A. ( 2006). Saturnius minutus n. sp. and S. dimitrovi n. sp. (Digenea: Hemiuridae) from Mugil cephalus L. (Teleostei: Mugilidae) with a multivariate morphological analysis of the Mediterranean species of Saturnius Manter, 1969. Systematic Parasitology (in the Press).Google Scholar
Bray, R. A. and Cribb, T. H. ( 2000). The status of the genera Hysterolecithoides Yamaguti, 1934, Neotheletrum Gibson & Bray, 1979 and Machidatrema León-Règagnon, 1998 (Digenea: Hemiuroidea), including a description of M. leonae n. sp. from Australian waters. Systematic Parasitology 46, 122.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. R., O'Grady, R. T. and Glen, D. R. ( 1985). Phylogenetic analysis of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Cercomeria) with comments on their adaptive radiation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63, 411443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabaud, A.-G. and Biguet, J. ( 1954). Etude d'un trématode hémiuride a métacercaire progènétique. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 29, 527545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cribb, T. H., Bray, R. A., Littlewood, D. T. J., Pichelin, S. P. and Herniou, E. A. ( 2001). The Digenea. In Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes ( ed. Littlewood, D. T. J. and Bray, R. A.), pp. 168185. Taylor and Francis, London.
Deblock, S. ( 1974). Présence en France de Bunocotyle progenetica (Markowsky, 1936) (Trématode Digène). Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France 99, 593600.Google Scholar
Domnich, I. F. and Sarabeev, V. L. ( 1999). Trematodes of the genus Bunocotyle (Trematoda, Halipegidae) from the haarder (Mugil so-iuy) acclimatized in the Azov Sea. Parazitologiya 33, 6770 (In Russian).Google Scholar
Domnich, I. F. and Sarabeev, V. L. ( 2000 a). Contemporary fauna of fish parasites in the northern part of the Azov Sea. Visnik Zaporiz'kogo Derzhavnogo Universitetu 1, 224230 (In Ukrainian).Google Scholar
Domnich, I. F. and Sarabeev, V. L. ( 2000 b). The trematodes of the Far-East-mullet-pelingas (Mugil soiuy) in the Azov Sea aquatories. Vestnik Zoologii 34, 715 (In Russian).Google Scholar
Georgiev, B. B., Biserkov, V. Y. and Genov, T. ( 1986). In toto staining method for cestodes in iron acetocarmine. Helminthologia 23, 279281.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. I. ( 2002). Family Hemiuridae. In Keys to the Trematoda. vol. 1 ( ed. Gibson, D. I., Jones, A. and Bray, R. A.), pp. 305340. CAB International, Wallingford.
Gibson, D. I. and Bray, R. A. ( 1979). The Hemiuroidea: terminology, systematics and evolution. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Zoology) 36, 35146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huelsenbeck, J. P. ( 2000). Mr Bayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
León-Règagnon, V. ( 1998). Machidatrema n. gen. (Digenea: Hemiuridae: Bunocotylinae) and phylogenetic analysis of its species. Journal of Parasitology 84, 140146.Google Scholar
León-Règagnon, V., Pérez-Ponce de León, G. and Brooks, D. R. ( 1998). Phylogenetic analysis of the Bunocotylinae Dollfus, 1950 (Digenea: Hemiuridae). Journal of Parasitology 84, 147152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, D. T. J. and Olson, P. D. ( 2001). Small subunit rDNA and the Platyhelminthes: signal, noise, conflict and compromise. In Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes ( ed. Littlewood, D. T. J. and Bray, R. A.), pp. 262278. Taylor and Francis, London.
Maddison, W. P. and Maddison, D. R. ( 2000). MacClade. Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
Manter, H. W. ( 1969). Three new genera of hemiurid trematodes from Australian fishes. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 26, 787792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowski, S. ( 1936). Über die Trematodenfauna der baltischen Mollusken aus der Umgebung der Halbinsel Hel. Bulletin de l'Academie Polonaise des Sciences et des Lettres, Série B: Sciences Naturelles 2, 285317.Google Scholar
Posada, D. and Crandall, K. A. ( 1998). Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odhner, T. ( 1928). Ein neuer Trematode aus dem Flussbarsch. Arkiv för Zoologi 20, 13.Google Scholar
Olson, P. D., Cribb, T. H., Tkach, V. V., Bray, R. A. and Littlewood, D. T. J. ( 2003). Phylogeny and classification of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda). International Journal for Parasitology 33, 733755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, R. M. ( 1977). A revision of Saturnius Manter, 1969 (Hemiuridae: Bunocotylinae) with descriptions of two new species from the striped mullet. In Excerta parasitológica en memoria del doctor Eduardo Caballero y Caballero. Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional de México, Publicaciones Especiales 4, 273284.Google Scholar
Reimer, L. ( 1961). Die Stufen der Progenesis bei dem Fischtrematoden Bunocotyle cingulata Odhner, 1928. Wiadomości Parazytologiczne 7, 843849.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. ( 2002). PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.