Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:00:40.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A revision of the subfamily Haplorchinae Looss, 1899 (Trematoda: Heterophyidae): I. The Haplorchis group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. C. Pearson
J. C. Pearson
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Queensland, Brisbane
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Earlier schemes of classification of the family Heterophyidae have been based in large part on such features as shape of body, presence of oral spines, number and position of testes, and distribution of vitellaria (Witenberg, 1929; Ciurea, 1933; Mueller & Van Cleave, 1932). Price (1940a) was the first to make extensive use of features of the ventrogenital complex (ventral sucker, gonotyl, genital pore, terminal male duct) and excretory bladder, and produced the first reasonable classification of both the family Heterophyidae and the superfamily Opisthorchioidea. In despite of the obvious significance of the rationale of Price's approach, later authors (Morozov, 1952, 1955; Yamaguti, 1958) have largely ignored the ventrogenital complex and recently discovered life-history data, and have used much the same sorts of features as earlier authors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , November 1964 , pp. 601 - 676
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdel-Azim, M. (1938). On the intestinal helminths of dogs in Egypt. J. Egypt. med. Ass. 21, 118–22.Google Scholar
Africa, C. M. (1938). Description of three trematodes of the genus Haplorchis (Heterophyidae), with notes on two other Philippine members of this genus. Philipp. J. Sci. 66, 299–307.Google Scholar
Africa, C. M. & Garcia, E. Y. (1935 a). Heterophyid trematodes of man and dog in the Philippines with descriptions of three new species. Philipp. J. Sci., 57, 253–67.Google Scholar
Africa, C. M. & Garcia, E. Y. (1935 b). Two more new heterophyid trematodes from the Philippines.Philipp. J. Sci., 57, 443–50.Google Scholar
Alicata, J. E. & Schattenburg, O. L. (1938). A case of intestinal heterophyidiasis of man in Hawaii. J. Amer. med. Ass. 110, 1100–01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. G. & Joyeux, Ch. (1961). (In Grassé, P. P. Traité de Zoologie. Anatomie, Systématique, Biologie, 4, Premier Fascicule, 692 pp. Paris: Masson et Cie.)Google Scholar
Balozet, L. & Callot, J. (1939). Trématodes de Tunisie. 3. Superfamilie Heterophyoidea. Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, 28, 34–63.Google Scholar
Bhalerao, G. D. (1936). Studies on the helminths of India. Trematoda III. J. Helminth. 14, 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cable, R. M., Connor, R. S. & Balling, J. W. (1960). Digenetic trematodes of Puerto Rican shore birds. Sci. Surv. P. R. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 17, 187–255.Google Scholar
Cable, R. M. & Hunninen, A. V. (1942). Studies on the life history of Siphodera vinaledwardsii (Linton) (Trematoda: Cryptogonimidae). J. Parasit. 28, 407–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, A. J. (1954). Animal Species and their Evolution, 190 pp. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Chatterji, P. N. (1948). On some Heterophyd (sic!) trematodes of the genus Haplorchis Looss, 1899. Abstract. Proc. 34 Indian Sci. Congr. Part iii, Sect. 7, 175.Google Scholar
Chatterji, P. N. (1953). Two new heterophyid trematodes of the genus Haplorchis Looss, 1899. Nat. Acad. Sci. India, 23, 163–74.Google Scholar
Chen, H. T. (1936). A study of the Haplorchinae (Looss 1899) Poche 1926 (Trematoda: Heterophyidae). Parasitology, 28, 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. T. (1949). Systematic consideration of some heterophyid trematodes in the subfamilies Haplorchinae and Stellantchasminae. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 43, 304–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. T. (1951). Stictodora manilensis and Stellantchasmus falcatus from Hong Kong, with a note on the validity of other species of the two genera. (Trematoda: Heterophyidae). Lingnan Sci. J. 23, 165–75.Google Scholar
Ciurea, S. (1933). Les vers parasites de l'homme, des mammiferes et des oiseaux provenant des poissons du Danube et de la Mer Noire. Arch. roum. Path. exp. microbiol. 6, 5–134.Google Scholar
Faust, E. C. & Nishigori, M. (1926). The life cycles of two new species of Heterophyidae, parasitic in mammals and birds. J. Parasit. 13, 91–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, W. (1933). Contributions to Ceylon helminthology. 3. Mesocoelium burti, sp.nov., Mesocoelium marrsi, sp.nov. and Haplorchis pearsoni, sp.nov. Spolia Zeylan. 18, 9–18.Google Scholar
Garcia, E. Y. & Refuerzo, P. G. (1936). Two more species of the genus Stictodora Looss, 1899, in the Philippines, with description of a new species. Philipp. J. Sci. 60, 137–41.Google Scholar
Gohar, N. (1934). Les trématodes parasites du milan egyptien Milvus migrans avec description d'une nouvelle espèce et remarques sur les genres Haplorchis Looss 1899 et Monorchotrema Nishigori 1924. Annls Parasit. hum. comp. 12, 218–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, S. P. (1955). Trematode parasites of fresh-water fishes. Indian J. Helminth. 5, 1–80.Google Scholar
Hsu, P. K. (1950 a). Some heterophyid metacercariae belonging to the genera Haplorchis and Procerovum (Trematoda: Heterophyidae). Lingnan Sci. J. 23, 1–20.Google Scholar
Hsu, P. K. (1950 b). A new trematode of the genus Procerovum from ducks and chickens in Canton (Trematoda: Heterophyidae). Peking nat. Hist. Bull. 19, 39–43.Google Scholar
Hsu, P. K. (1951). A comparative study of the early larval stages of some heterophyid trematodes belonging to the genera Haplorchis and Procerovum (Trematoda: Heterophyidae). Lingnan Sci. J. 23, 235–56.Google Scholar
Isaichikov, I. M. (1927). (After Morozov, F. N., 1952, Heterophyoidea Faust 1929 in Skrjabin, K. I. Trematodes of animals and man 6, 153–9, Moscow: Akad. Nauk, U.S.S.R.)Google Scholar
Jägerskiöld, L. A. K. E. (1896). Ueber Monostomum lacteum n.sp. Zool. Stud. Festskr. Wilhelm Lilljeborg, Upsala, 165–77.Google Scholar
Katsuta, I. (1931). Studies on trematodes whose second intermediate hosts are fishes from the brackish waters of Formosa. I. On a new trematode Stellantchasmus formosanus of which the mullet is the second intermediate host. J. med. Ass. Formosa, 30. [In Japanese with English summ., Suppl., 95–6.]Google Scholar
Katsuta, I. (1932 a). Studies on trematodes whose second intermediate hosts are fishes from the brackish waters of Formosa. III. On a new trematode Monorchotrema microrchia of which the mullet is the second intermediate host. J. med. Ass. Formosa, 31. [In Japanese with English summ., Suppl., 16.]Google Scholar
Katsuta, I. (1932 b). Studies on trematodes whose second intermediate hosts are fishes from the brackish waters of Formosa. IV. On a new trematode Monorchotrema yokogawai of which the mullet is the second intermediate host. J. med. Ass. Formosa, 31. [In Japanese with English summ., Suppl., 25–6.]Google Scholar
Katsuta, I. (1932 c). Studies on trematodes whose second intermediate hosts are fishes from the brackish waters of Formosa. IV. On a new trematode Monorchotrema yokogawai of which the mullet is the second intermediate host. J. med. Ass. Formosa, 31, 253–65. [Japanese text, quoted in Chen, 1936.]Google Scholar
Katsuta, I. (1932 d). Studies on trematodes whose second intermediate hosts are fishes from the brackish waters of Formosa. V. On a new trematode Stellantchasmus amplicaecalis of which the mullet is the second intermediate host. J. med. Ass. Formosa, 31. [In Japanese with English summ., Suppl., 40–1.]Google Scholar
Khalil, M. (1932). The life history of a heterophyid parasite in Egypt. C.R. Congr. Internat. Méd. Trop. Hyg. 4, 137–46.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H. (1942). Studies on trematodes in Hainan Island. II. Trematoda found in the intestinal tracts of dogs by experimental feeding with certain fresh and brackish water fish. Jap. J. med. Sci. Path. 6, 187–227.Google Scholar
Kuntz, R. E. & Chandler, A. C. (1956). Studies on Egyptian trematodes with special reference to the heterophyids of mammals. I. Adult flukes, with descriptions of Phagicola longicollis, n.sp., Cynodiplostomum namrui, n.sp., and a Stephanoprora from cats. J. Parasit. 42, 445–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lie, K. J. (1951). Some human flukes from Indonesia. Docum. neerl. indones. Morb. trop. 3, 105–16.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1896). Recherches sur la faune parasitaire de l'Egypte. Première partie. Mém. Inst. égypt. (Egypte), 3, 1–252.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1899). Weitere Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Trematoden-Fauna Aegyptens, zugleich Versuch einer natürlichen Gliederung des Genus Distomum Retzius. Zool. Jb. 12, 521–784.Google Scholar
Martin, W. E. (1950 a). Euhaplorchis californiensis n.g., n.sp., Heterophyidae, Trematoda, with notes on its life-cycle. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc. 69, 194–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, W. E. (1950 b). Parasitictodora (sic!) hancocki n.gen., n.sp. (Trematoda: Heterophyidae), with observations on its life cycle. J. Parasit. 36, 360–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, W. E. (1950 c). Phocitremoides ovale n.gen., n.sp (Trematoda: Opisthorchiidae) with observations on its life cycle. J. Parasit. 36, 552–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, W. E. (1951). Pygidiopsoides spindalis n.gen., n.sp. (Heterophyidae: Trematoda), and its second intermediate host. J. Parasit. 37, 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, W. E. (1958). The life histories of some Hawaiian heterophyid trematodes. J. Parasit. 44, 305–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morozov, F. N. (1952). (In Skrjabin, K. I. Trematodes of Animals and Man, 6, 153–615. Moscow: Akad. Nauk, U.S.S.R.)Google Scholar
Morozov, F. N. (1955). (In Skrjabin, K. I. Trematodes of Animals and Man, 10, Moscow: Akad. Nauk, U.S.S.R.)Google Scholar
Mueller, J. F. & Van Cleave, H. J. (1932). Parasites of Oneida Lake fishes. Part II. Descriptions of new species and some general taxonomic considerations especially concerning the trematode family Heterophyidae. Roosevelt Wild Life Ann. 3, 79–137.Google Scholar
Nishigori, M. (1924). The life cycles of two new species of Heterophyidae, Monorchotrema taihokui and M. taichui, found in Formosa. Preliminary note. J. med. Ass. Formosa, (237), 567–70 (not seen).Google Scholar
Noda, K. (1959). The larval development of Stellantchasmus falcatus (Trematoda: Heterophyidae) in the first intermediate host. J. Parasit. 45, 635–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odening, K. (1962). Trematoden aus indischen Vögeln des Berliner Tierparks. Z. Parasitenk. 21, 381–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onji, Y. & Nishio, T. (1916). A review of new intestinal flukes. Igaku Chuo Zasshi [Japanese text], 14, 439–42 (not seen).Google Scholar
Onji, Y. & Nishio, T. (1924). On the intestinal trematodes. Chiba Igakukwai Zasshi [Japanese text], 2, 351–99 (transl. C. Shoho).Google Scholar
Peacock, H. A. (1940). Elementary Microtechnique, 330 pp. London: Edward Arnold and Co.Google Scholar
Pearson, J. C. (1960). New records of trematodes from the cat. Aust. vet. J. 36, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poche, F. (1926). Das System der Platodaria. Arch. Naturgesch., Berlin, 91, 1–458.Google Scholar
Pratt, H. S. (1902). Synopses of North-American invertebrates. XII. The Trematodes. Part II.—The Aspidocotylea and the Malacocotylea, or digenetic forms. Amer. Nat. 36, 887–910; 953–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, E. W. (1940 a). A review of the trematode superfamily Opisthorchioidea. Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash. 7, 1–13.Google Scholar
Price, E. W. (1940 b). A review of the heterophyid trematodes, with special reference to those parasitic in man. Int. Congr. Microbiol. Rep. Proc. 446–47.Google Scholar
Prudhoe, S. (1949). A review of the trematode genus Galactosomum. J. Helminth. 23, 135–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ransom, B. H. (1920). Synopsis of the trematode family Heterophyidae with descriptions of a new genus and five new species. Proc. U.S. nat. Mus. 57, 527–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, M. (1938). A note on finfolds of cercariae of the superfamily Opisthorchioidea Vogel, 1934 (Trematoda). Novit. Zool. 41, 170–3.Google Scholar
Shen, W. X. (1959). [Notes on the morphology and life history of Haplorchis pumilio (Trematoda: Heterophyidae).] Acta zool. sinica, 11, 470–81 (Transl.).Google Scholar
Silva, N. N. de. (1952). A re-description of the trematode Haplorchis pearsoni Fernando, 1933, with special reference to its systematic position. Ceylon J. Sci. B, 25, 11–8.Google Scholar
Sonsino, P. (1892). Studi sui parassiti de molluschi di acqua dolce nei dintorni di Cairo in Egitto. Festschr. 70 Geburtst. R. Leuckart's 134–46.Google Scholar
Srivastava, H. D. (1935). Studies on the family Heterophyidae Odhner, 1911. Part II. Four new parasites of the genus Haplorchis Looss, 1899, from Indian fresh-water fishes, with a revision of the genus. Proc. Acad. Sci. Unit. Prov. 5, 75–85.Google Scholar
Tubangui, M. A. (1933). Trematode parasites of Philippine vertebrates, VI. Descriptions of new species and classification. Philipp. J. Sci. 52, 167–97.Google Scholar
Vazquez-Colet, A. & Africa, C. M. (1940). Morphological studies on various Philippine heterophyid metacercariae with notes on the incidence, site, and degree of metacercarial infection in three species of marine fish. Philipp. J. Sci. 72, 395–419.Google Scholar
Witenberg, G. (1929). Studies on the trematode family Heterophyidae. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 23, 131–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witenberg, G. (1930). Corrections to my paper ‘Studies on the trematode family Heterophyidae’. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 5, 412–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1958). Systema Helminthum. Vol. 1. The Digenetic Trematodes of Vertebrates, 979 pp. New York: Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar