Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:56:03.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resistance of Phlebotomus papatasi to infection with Leishmania donovani is modulated by components of the infective bloodmeal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1998

Y. SCHLEIN
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem PO Box 12272, Israel 91120
R. L. JACOBSON
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem PO Box 12272, Israel 91120

Abstract

The circumstances which permit the establishment of Leishmania infections in sandflies were investigated by altering the growth conditions for L. donovani parasites in the unsuitable vector Phlebotomus papatasi. Only 5·0% of the sandflies harboured a few parasites 3 days after feeding on promastigotes in defibrinated blood. Heparinized blood or the addition of trypsin inhibitor to the meals allowed persistence of infections (day 6) in 9·9% and 25·8% of the flies respectively. Meals of erythrocytes, saline and amastigotes produced 44·4% fly infection on day 6, while similar promastigote-initiated infections remained in 70·3% of the flies. Proteolytic activities in the guts of sandflies fed on the above meals without parasites, were the highest after defibrinated bloodmeals. Erythrocytes with saline decreased the maximal alkaline protease level from 20·8 U to 13·5 U/fly; that of trypsin from 3·9 U to 1·8 U/fly and that of the aminopeptidase from 5·5 U to 3·9 U/fly. After meals of heparinized blood, the maximal alkaline protease activity (12·0 U/fly) was also much lower than after defibrinated blood-feeding. The different diets which resulted in comparatively low enzymatic activities, including blood with trypsin inhibitor, also promoted the survival of infections. This implies that the proteolytic activity in the sandfly gut modulates the vector susceptibility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)