Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:15:10.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reproduction of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis in the rat intestine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. F. Phillipson
Affiliation:
The Research Laboratories, May and Baker Ltd, Dagenham, Essex

Extract

Evidence was obtained that copulation of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis did not occur until at least 104 h after rats had been subcutaneously infected with 1000 3rd-stage larvae. The majority of worms copulated for the first time approximately 120 h after infection.

Females usually, but not invariably, contained infertile eggs in the uterus before the first insemination occurred. Fertile eggs were not seen in the uterus until sperm had ascended from the vagina to the seminal receptacle, a process which appeared to take about 3 h.

On average each female in a normal mixed infection was capable of producing about 1000 fertile eggs every 24 h. Females recovered from rats on the 10th day after infection and transplanted into uninfected rats, were capable of producing an average of 3500 fertile eggs each without further insemination. When newly matured females, which had received a single full insemination, were isolated from males they produced on average, between 1000 and 1500 fertile eggs each.

From these observations it was concluded that in normal mixed infections females must copulate at least once every other day and probably once a day, in order to maintain fertile egg output. It was also deduced that females are capable of storing from 4000 to 4500 sperm in the seminal receptacle.

There was clear evidence of reduced reproductive efficiency in both male and female worms recovered from rats during the expulsion phase of the infection.

The author wishes to thank Professor J. J. C. Buckley and Dr J. A. McFadzean for their suggestions, criticism and encouragement and Miss G. Merchant and Mrs P. Counsel for able technical assistance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gordon, H. McL. & Whitlock, H. V. (1939). A new technique for counting nematode eggs in sheep faeces. J. Coun. scient. ind. Res. Aust. 12, 50–2.Google Scholar
Haley, A. J. (1962). Biology of the rat nematode, Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Travassos, 1914). II. Preparasitic stages and development in the laboratory rat. J. Parasit. 48, 1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haley, A. J. & Parker, J. C. (1961). Effect of population density on adult worm survival in primary Nippostrongylus brasiliensis infections in the rat. Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash. 28, 176–80.Google Scholar
Keeling, J. E. D. (1960). The effects of ultra-violet radiation on Nippostrongylus muris. I. Irradiation of infective larvae: lethal and sublethal effects. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 54, 182–91.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. F. (1964). Some observations on reproduction in Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Parasitology 54, 4P.Google Scholar
Weinstein, P. P. & Jones, M. F. (1956). The in vitro cultivation of Nippostrongylus muris to the adult stage. J. Parasit. 42, 215–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, P. P. & Jones, M. F. (1959). Development in vitro of some parasitic nematodes of vertebrates. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 77, 136–62.Google Scholar
Willis, H. H. (1921). A simple levitation method for the detection of hookworm ova. Med. J. Aust. 8, 375–6.Google Scholar