Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:49:44.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reference List of the Trematode Parasites of British Birds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

William Nicoll
William Nicoll
Affiliation:
London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As a subject of investigation the Trematode fauna of British Birds does not appear to have aroused at any time much enthusiasm amongst British zoologists and as a result we owe the greater part of our knowledge of the subject to continental workers. The fact that our bird fauna is practically identical with that of the adjacent parts of Western Europe would lead us to expect that the parasites of our birds should not differ materially from those met with in the same species of birds on the continent. As a matter of fact, no species of bird Trematode hitherto recorded from this country can be regarded as peculiar to Britain, with the possible exception of Echinostephilla virgula Lebour, which, however, will almost certainly be met with in other localities later.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1923 , pp. 151 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnsdorff, A. (1908). Monostomum vicarium n. sp. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 1ste Abt. XLVII, 362–6.Google Scholar
Barker, F. D. (1911). The Trematode Genus Opisthorchis R. Blanchard 1895. Archiv. de Parasitol. XIV, 513–61.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1895). Animaux parasites. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, XX, 217.Google Scholar
Brandes, G. (1888). Die Familie der Holostomeae. pp. 72. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1889). Helminthologisches. Arch. f. Naturg. LIV, 247–51.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1890). Die Familie der Holostomiden. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. V, 549–604.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1892). Revision der Monostomiden. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 1ste Abt, XII, 504–11.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1893). “Vermes,” in Bronn's Klassen und Ordnung des Thier-Reichs, IV, 819–903.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1900). Die Arten der Gattung Clinostomum Leidy. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. XIV, 1–48.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1901 a). Trematoden der Bursa Fabricii, des Eileiters und der Eier der Vögel. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 1ste Abt. XXIX, 12–19.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1901 b). Zur Revision der Trematoden der Vögel. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 560–8, 895–7, 941–8.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1902). Fascioliden der Vögel. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. XVI, 1–162.Google Scholar
Ciurea, J. (1911). Eine europäische Clinostomum-Larve. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 1ste Abt. LX, 354–8.Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. S. (1859). On some new forms of Entozoa. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, XXII, 363–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbold, T. S. (1860). Synopsis of the Distomidae. Journ. Proc. Linn. Soc. Zool. (17), V, 1–56.Google Scholar
Cohn, L. (1904). Helminthologische Mitteilungen II. Archiv. f. Naturg. (i), 232.Google Scholar
Cole, L. J. (1911). A Trematode Parasite of the English sparrow in the United States. Bull. Wiscon. Nat. Hist. Soc. Milwaukee, IX, 42–8.Google Scholar
Creplin, F. C. H. (1829). Novae obsermtiones de Entozois. pp. 134. Berlin.Google Scholar
Creplin, F. C. H. (1837). “Distoma,” in Allgemein. Encyclopaed. d. Wissenschaft. u. Künste (Ersch und Gruber), Leipzig, XXIX, 309–29.Google Scholar
Creplin, F. C. H. (1846). Nachträge zu Gurlt's Verzeichnis der Tiere, bei welehen Entozoen gefunden worden sind. Arch. f. Naturg. XII, 129–60.Google Scholar
Creplin, F. C. H. (1849). Nachträge u.s.w. Arch. f. Naturg. XV, 52–80.Google Scholar
Deslongchamps, E. E. (1824). “Monostome,” in Encyclopaedia méthodique, Paris, II, 551–5.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. (1836). Monographic der Gattungen Amphistoma und Diplodiscus. Ann. Wien Mus. Naturg. I, 235–60.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. (1850). Systema Helminthum. 2 vols. Vindobonae.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. (1855). Neunzehn Arten von Trematoden. Denkschr. d. k. Akad. Wissenschaft. Wien, Math.-Naturwiss. Cl. X, 59–70.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. (1858). Revision der Myzhebninthen. Abt, Trematoden. Sitzungsber. d. k. Akad. Wissenschaft. Wien, Math.-Naturwiss. Cl. XXXII, 207–390.Google Scholar
Dietz, E. (1909). Die Echinostomiden der Vögel. Zool. Anzeig. XXXIX, 180–92.Google Scholar
Dietz, E. (1910). Die Eehinostomiden der Vögel. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. XII, Suppl. 265–512.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1845). Histoire naturelle des Helminthes. Paris.Google Scholar
Fischoeder, F. (1903). Die Paramphistomiden der Säugethiere. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. XVII, 485–660.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1919). Notes helminthologiques suisses II. Rev. Suisse Zool. Génève, XXVII, 353–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giard, A. (1907). Sur les Trématodes margaritigènes du Pas-de-Calais; Gymnophallus somateriae Levins, et G. bursicola Odhner. C. R. Soc. Biol. LXIII, 416–20.Google Scholar
Giebel, C. (1857). Nitzsch's helminthologische Untersuchungen. Zeitschr. f. d. gesammt. Naturw. Berlin, IX, 264–9.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. C. (1905). Occurrence of Echinostomum spinuslosum Rud. Amer. Naturalist, XXXIX, 925–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberger, J. and Crane, C. (1911). A new species of Athesmia (A. foxi) from a monkey. U.S. Hyg. Lab., Bull. 71, pp. 48–55.Google Scholar
Guberlet, J. E. (1922). Journ. of Parasitology, IX, 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jägerskiöld, L. A. (1896). Ueber Monostomum lacteum n. sp. Festskrift för Lilljeborg, pp. 167–77.Google Scholar
Jägerskiöld, L. A. (1898). Distomum lingua Creplin, ein genitalnapftragendes Distomum. Bergens Museums Aarborg, No. II. pp. 7.Google Scholar
Jägerskiöld, L. A. (1900 a). Diplostomum macrostomum n. sp. Centralbl. f. Bakt. (i), XXVII, 33–37.Google Scholar
Jägerskiöld, L. A. (1900 b). Levinsenia (Distomum) pygmaea Levinsen, ein genitalnapftragendes Distomum. Centralbl. f. Bakt. pp. 732–40.Google Scholar
Jägerskiöld, L. A. (1901). Tocotrema expansum (Crepl.) (= Monostomum expansum Crepl.), eine genital-napftragende Distomide. Centralbl. f. Bakt. XXX, 979–83.Google Scholar
Jägerskiöld, L. A. (1903). Scaphanocephalus expansus (Crepl.), eine genital-napftragende Distomide. Results of Swedish Zool. Exped. Egypt and the White Nile, No. 23. pp. 16.Google Scholar
Jägerskiöld, L. A. (1907). Zur Kenntnis der Trematoden-Gattung Levinseniella. Zool. Stud, till T. Tullberg, Uppsala, pp. 133–54.Google Scholar
Jägerskiöld, L. A. (1908). Kleine Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Vogeltrematoden. Centralbl. f. Bakt. XLVIII, 302–17.Google Scholar
Jameson, H. L. and Nicoll, W. (1913). On some parasites of the Scoter duck (Oidemia nigra) and their relation to the pearl-inducing Trematode in the edible mussel (Mytilus edulis). Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jegen, C. (1917). Collyriclum faba (Bremser) Kossack. Ein Parasit der Singvögel. Zeitschr. f. wissenschaft. Zool. CXVII, 460–553.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. C. (1920). The Life-Cycle of Echinostomum revolutum (Froelich). Univ. of California Publications in Zoology, XIX, 335–88.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. J. (1914). Australian Trematodes and Cestodes, a study in Zoo-Geography. Medical Journ. of Australia, Sept. 12th. pp. 5.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. J. (1917). On the Trematodes of Australian Birds. Journ. R. Soc. New South Wales, L, 187–261.Google Scholar
Kossack, W. (1911). Ueber Monostomiden. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. XXXI, 491–590.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M. (1898 a). Éludes helminthologiques v. Contribution à l'étude de quelques Trématodes. Bull. Acad. Sci. Cracovie, pp. 69–77.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M. (1898 b). Über Opisthorchis pianae Galli-Valerio. Centralbl. f. Bakt. XXIII, 751–2.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M. (1902). Materials for Polish helminthological parasitic fauna III. Sprawoz. Kom. fizyogr. Akad. Krakow, XXXVI, 21–30.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M. (1903). Helminthological Studies VII. Bull. Acad. Sci. Cracovie, pp. 517–20.Google Scholar
Krause, R. (1914). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Hemistominen. Zeitschr. f. wissenschaft. Zool. CXII, 93–228.Google Scholar
Lawrow, S. (1908). Resultate der Untersuchungen der Würmer Fauna des Wolga-Flusses und der Wiesen-Seen bei Saratow. Arbeiten aus der biologischen Wolga-Station, III, No. 3.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V. (1909). Trematodes of the Northumberland Coast, No. III. Trans. Nat. Hist. Soc. Northumberland, III, 440–5.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V. (1912). A Review of the British Marine Cercariae. Parasitology, IV, 416–56.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V. and Elmhirst, R. (1922). A Contribution towards the Life-history of Parorchis acanthus Nicoll. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. Plymouth, XII, 829–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Linstow, O. (1873). Einige neue Distomen und Bemerkungen über die weibliohen Sexualorgane der Trematoden. Arch. f. Naturg. XXXIX, 95–108.Google Scholar
von Linstow, O. (1875). Beobachtungen an neuen und bekannten Helminthen. Arch. f. Naturg. XLI, 183–207.Google Scholar
von Linstow, O. (1877). Enthelminthologica. Arch. f. Naturg. XLIII, 173–98.Google Scholar
von Linstow, O. (1878 and 1889). Compendium der Helminthologie and Nachtrag. Hannover; Hahn'sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
von Linstow, O. (1883). Nematoden, Trematoden und Acanthocephalen gesammelt von Prof. Fedtschenko in Turkestan. Arch. f. Naturg. XLIX, 274–314.Google Scholar
von Linstow, O. (1885). Beobaehtungen an bekannten und neuen Nematoden und Trematoden. Arch. f. Naturg. LI, 235–55.Google Scholar
von Linstow, O. (1887). Helminthologische Untersuchungen. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. III, 97–114.Google Scholar
von Linstow, O. (1894). Helminthologische Studien. Zeitschr.f. Naturwiss. Jena, XXVIII, 328–42.Google Scholar
von Linstow, O. (1904). über eine neue Art der Copula bei Distomen. Zool. Anzeig. XXVIII, 252–4.Google Scholar
von Linstow, O. (1906). Neue und bekannte Hehninthen. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. XXIV, 1–20.Google Scholar
Linton, E. (1914). Notes on a viviparous Distome. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. XLVI, 551–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, E. (1915). Tocotrema lingua (Creplin). The adult stage of a skin parasite of the Cunner, etc. Journ. of Parasitology I, 128–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Looss, A. (1896). Recherches sur la faune parasitaire de l'Egypte. Mém. Inst. Egypt. IIIGoogle Scholar
Looss, A. (1899). Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Trematoden-Fauna Aegyptens. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. XII, 521–784.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1902). Über neue und bekannte Trematoden aus Seesehildkröten. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. XVI, 411–894.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1907 a). über einige zum Teil neue Distomen der europäischen Fauna. Centralbl. f. Bakt. XLIII, 604–13.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1907 b). Notizen zur Helminthologie Aegyptens VII. Über einige neue Trematoden der ägyptischen Fauna. Centralbl. f. Bakt. pp. 478–90.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1898). Beiträge zur Helminthfauna der Berberei. Sitzungsber. d. k. preuss. Akad. Wissenschaft. Berlin, XL, 619–28.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1908). Zur Systematik und Faunistik der Distomen. I. Die Gattung Metorchis Looss nebst Bemerkungen über die Familie Opisthorchiidae. Centralbl. f. Bakt. XLVIII, 428–36.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1909). “Parasitische Plattwürmer. Trematodes,”in Die Suswasserfauna Deutschlands, XVII.Google Scholar
Markow, M. (1903). Sur un nouveau représentant du genre Prostogonimus—P. anatinus n. sp. Trav. soc. nat. Univ. Kharkov, XXXVII, 287–94.Google Scholar
Molin, R. (1858). Prospectus helminthum, quae in prodrome faunae helminthologicae Venetiae continentur. Sitzungsber. d. k. Akad. Wissenschaft. Wien, Math.-Naturw. Cl. XXX, 127–58.Google Scholar
Molin, R. (1859 a). Prospectus helminthum quae in parte secundo continentur. Sitzungsber. d. k. Akad. Wissenschaft. Wien, Math.-Naturw. Cl. XXXIII, 287–302.Google Scholar
Molin, R. (1859 b). Nuovi myzelmintha raccolti ed esaminati. Sitzungsber. d. k. Akad. Wissenschaft. Wien, Math.-Naturw. Cl. XXXVII, 818–54.Google Scholar
Molin, R. (1861). Prodromus faunae helminthologicae Venetae adjectis disquisitionibus anatomicis et criticis. Denkschr. d. k. Akad. d. Wissenschaft. Wien, Math.-Naturw. Cl. XIX, 189–338.Google Scholar
Mühling, P. (1896). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Trematoden. Arch. f. Naturg. LXII, 243–79.Google Scholar
M¨uhling, P. (1898). Die Helminthfauna der Wirbelthiere Ostpreussens. Arch. f. Naturg. LXIV, 1–118.Google Scholar
Mueller, A. (1897). Helminthologische Mitteilungen. Arch. f. Naturg. LXIII, 1–26.Google Scholar
Nicoll, W. (1906). Some new and little-known Trematodes. Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), XVII, 513–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, W. (1907 a). Observations on the Trematode Parasites of British Birds. Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), XX, 66–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, W. (1907 b). Parorchis acanthus, the type of a new genus of Trematodes. Quart. Journ. Micros. Science, LI, 345–55.Google Scholar
Nicoll, W. (1909). Studies on the Structure and Classification of the Digenetic Trematodes. Quart. Journ. Micros. Science LIII, 391–487.Google Scholar
Nicoll, W. (1910). The Bionomics of Helminths. Trans. Soc. Trop. Med. III, 353–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, W. (1915). A new liver fluke (Platynosomum acuminatum) from the Kestrel. Proc. Zool.Soc. London, pp. 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odhner, T. (1900). Gymnophallus, cine neue Gattung von Vogeldistomen. Centralbl. f. Bakt, XXVIII, 12–23.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1905). Die Trematoden des arktischen Gebietes. Fauna Arctica, IV (2), 291–372.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1910 a). Nordostafrikanische Trematoden, grösstenteils vom Weissen Nil. i Fascioliden. Results of Swedish Zool. Exped. Egypt and the While Nile (1907), IV, No. 23 A. pp 166.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1910 b). Microlistrum Braun, eine angebliche Distomengattung. Zool. Anzeig. XXXV, 353–6.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1910 c). Gigantobilharzia acotylea n. g., n. sp., ein mit den Bilharzien verwandte Blutparasit von enormer Länge. Zool. Anzeig. pp. 380–5.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1912). Zum natürlichen System der digenen Trematoden v. Zool. Anzeig. XLI, 54–71.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1913). Zum natürlichen System der digenen Trematoden VI. Zool. Anzeig. XLII, 289–318.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1914). Die Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Trematodengattung Paragonimus Brn. Zool. Beiträge aus Uppsala, III, 231–46.Google Scholar
Olsson, P. (1876). Bidrag til Skand. Helminthfauna. Svensk. Vetensk. Akad. Handl. Stockholm, XIV (i). pp. 35.Google Scholar
Olsson, P. (1893). Bidrag til Skand. Helminthfauna II. Svensk. Vetensk. Akad. Handl. Stockholm, XXV, No. 12.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. L. (1911). On the Distribution and Mode of Occurrence in the United States and Canada of Clinostomum marginatum, a Trematode parasite of fish, frogs and birds. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Mass, XX, 350–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, P. (1912). On the structure of Clinostomum marginatum, a Trematode parasite of the Frog, Bass and Heron. Journ. Morph. XXIII, 189–223.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P. (1906). Trématodes parasites de Mollusques marins. Bull. scient. France et Belg. XL, 1–186.Google Scholar
Pratt, H. S. (1911). On Galactosomum cochleariforme Rudolphi. Zool. Anzeig. XXVIII, 143–8.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. (1900). Trématodes hepatiques des oiseaux. C.R. Soc. Biol. LII, 239–42.Google Scholar
Ransom, B. H. (1920). Synopsis of the Trematode Family Heterophyidae, with descriptions of a new genus and four new species. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. LVII, 527–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ráiz, S. von (1900 a). Parasitologioi jegyzetek. Veterinarius, Budapest, XXIII, 525–34.Google Scholar
Rátz, S. von (1900 a). Über Distomum saginatum n. sp. Centralbl. f. Bakt. (i), XXVIII, 437–9.Google Scholar
Rátz, S. von (1903). Un genre nouveau de fasciolides. Ann. Mus. Nat. Hungar. Budapest, I, 413–32.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A. (1808–1810). Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalium historia naturalis. pp. 1370. Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A. (1819). Entozoorum Synopsis cui accedunt mantissa duplex et indices locnpletissimi, pp. 811. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzer, F. (1907). Anatomische Untersuchungen über den Wurmstar der Fische. Arch. Augenheilkunde, Wiesbaden, LVIII, 19–39.Google Scholar
Schlotthauber, C. (1860). Beiträge zur Helminthologie. Amtl. Bericht. 31ste Versamml. deutsch. Naturf. und Aerzte, Göttingen, pp. 121–33.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. (1912). Parasitische Wünner der Vögel Turkestans. A. Trematodes. 1. Prosthogoniminae. Arch. veterin. nauk. St Petersburg, XLII, 1270–87.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. (1913 a). Vogeltrematoden aus russisch Turkestan. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. XXXV, 351–88.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. (1913 b). Parasitische Würmer der Vögel Turkestans. A. Trematodes. 2. Orchipedinae. Arch. veterin. nauk. St Petersburg, XLIII, 339–44.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. (1914). Lyperosomum filiforme n. sp. Materialien zur Systematik der Gattung Lyperosomum Looss 1899. Zeitschr. f. wissen. u. prakt. Veterinar. Med. VII, 274–91.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. (1915 a). Trématodes des oiseaux de l'Oural. Ann. Mus. Zool. Acad. Imp. Sc. XX, 395–417.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. (1915 b). Ein neuer Parasit der Bursa Fabricii der Vögel. Rev. véter. Moskva, XVII, 238–9.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. (1916). Parasitic Trematodes and Nematodes collected by the Expedition of Prof. V.Dogiel and I. Sokolow in British East Africa, pp. 59.Google Scholar
Solowiow, P. T. (1911). Eine neue Art des Genus Dicrocoelium Dujardin und eine Excursion in Gebiet der Systematik und Phylogenie der Fasciolidae der Vögel. Arbeit, zool. Labor. Univ. Warschau 1911. pp. 23.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. (1912). Vers parasitaires des oiseaux du Turkestan. St Pétersbourg Ann. Mtis. Zool. Acad. Imp. Sc. XVII, 86–115.Google Scholar
Ssinizin, D. F. (1897). Endoparasiten der Vögel aus der Umgebend Warsohau. Arb. labor. zool. Kab. Univ. Warschau, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. (1901). Notes on Parasites 53. Science, N.S. XIII, 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, C. W. and Hassall, A. (1896). Notes on Parasites 42. The Veterinary Magazine, III, No. 3.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1892). I Distomi degli Uccelli. Lavoro Monografico. Boll. Soc. Adriat. sc. nat. Trieste, XIII, 143–96.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1896). Ricerche elmintologiche. Boll. Soc. Adriat. sc. nat. XVII, 121–36.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1898 a). Note parassitologiche. Boll. Soc. Adriat. sc. nat. XVIII, 1–10.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1898 b). Saggio di una fauna elmintologica di Trieste e provincie cotermini. Program. civ. scuola sup. Trieste, pp. 162.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1902). Il Monostormim mutabile Zeder e le sui formi affini. Boll. Soc. Adriat. sc. nat. Trieste, XXI, 1–40Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1903). Note distomologiche. Boll. Soc. Adriat. sc. nat. XXI, 193–201.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1905). Note distomologiehe III. Boll. Soc. Adriat. sc. nat. XXII, 211–27.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H. W. (1916). On the Anatomy and Relationships of some North American Trematodes. Journ. of Parasitology, III, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoss, E. (1897). Über den Bau von Holostomum cucullus nov. spec. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Trematoden. Leipzig, Inaug. Dissert, pp. 66.Google Scholar
La Valette, A. J. H. (1855). Symbolae ad trematodum evolutionis historiam. pp. 38. Berlin.Google Scholar
Villot, F. (1878). Organisation et développement de quelques espèces de trématodes endoparasites marins. Ann. sc. nat. Paris, zool. XLIX, pp. 40.Google Scholar
Villot, F. (1898). L'hémistome du Martin-pêcheur. Assoc. franc, avanc. de science, C.-R. Paris, XXVI, 538–42.Google Scholar
Ward, H. B. (1901). Notes on the Parasites of the Lake Fish. in. On the structure of the copulatory organ in Microphallus nov. gen. Trans. Amer. Micros. Soc. XXII, 175–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, H. B. (1917). On the structure and classification of North American Parasitic Worms. Journ. of Parasitology, IV, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedl, C. (1857). Anatomische Beobachtungen über Trematoden. Sitzungsber. d. k. Akad. Wissenschaft. Wien, Math.-Naturw. Cl. XXVI, 241–78.Google Scholar
Weski, O. (1900). Mitteilungen über Distomum lancea Dies. Centralbl. f. Bakt. XXVII, 579–83.Google Scholar
Wolffhügel, K. (1900). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Vogelhelminthen. pp.204. Freiburg-i.-Pr.Google Scholar
Zeder, J. G. H. (1800). Erster Nachtrag zur Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer. pp. 320. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zeder, J. G. H. (1803). Anleitung zur Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer. pp.432. Bamberg.Google Scholar