Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:46:55.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The propulsion of the cercariae of Himasthla secunda (Nicoll) and Cryptocotyle lingua

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. D. Chapman  and
R. A. Wilson
H. D. Chapman
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York
R. A. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The locomotion of two species of cercariae has been studied by cinematography. The ability of the tail to generate bending waves providing the force to drive the cercaria forward has been demontrated. The waveform of the tail and its relation to the pattern of movement has been described and evidence is presented that the tail is capable of propagating complicated swimming movements in the absence of the body. The pattern of propulsion is related to the functional organisation of the tail musculature of the cercaria.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , August 1973 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bevelander, G. (1933). Response to light in the cercariae of Bucephalus elegans. Physiological Zoology 6, 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cable, R. M. (1956). Marine cercariae of Puerto Rico. Science survey Porto Rico & Virgin Islands 16, 491–577.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. D. (1973). The functional organisation and fine structure of the tail musculature of the cercariae of Cryptocotyle lingua and Himasthla secunda. Parasitology 66, 487–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cort, W. W. & Talbot, S. B. (1936). Studies on sehistosome dermatitis. Observations on the behaviour of the dermatitis producing schistosome cercariae. American Journal of Hygiene 23, 385–96.Google Scholar
Dawes, B. (1946). The Trematoda. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, G. (1929). Les cercaires de la Région de Neuchâtel. Bulletin de la Société neuchâteloise des sciences naturelles 53, 3–177.Google Scholar
Graefe, G., Hohorst, W. & Drager, H. (1967). Forked tail of the cercaria of Schistosoma mansoni. Nature, London 215, 207–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathias, P. (1925). Reserches experimentales sur le cycle evolutif de quelques trematodes. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass. 49, 1–123.Google Scholar
Miller, H. M. (1928). Variety of behaviour of larval trematodes. Science 68, 117–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olivier, L. (1940). Life history studies on two strigeid trematodes of the Douglas Lake Region of Michigan. Journal of Parasitology 26, 447–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, G. (1971). Locomotion of the cercaria of Parorchis acanthus, Nicoll and the ultrastructure of the tail. Parasitology 62, 489–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, J. D. (1966). The physiology of trematodes. University Reviews in Biology. Olivier and Boyd.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H. W. (1950). Further observations on cercaria Parvicaudata. Stunkard & Shaw 1931. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass. 99, 136–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, C. C. (1941). Morphology and life history of Prosostephanus industrius (Tubangii 1922) Lutz, 1935 (Trematode: Cyathocotylidae) Peking Natural History Bulletin 16, 29–43.Google Scholar