Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:51:33.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Passive protection with cells or antiserum against Nippostrongylus brasiliensis in the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Bridget M. Ogilvie
Affiliation:
National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, N.W. 7
Valerie E. Jones
Affiliation:
National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, N.W. 7

Extract

Rats can be passively protected against N. brasiliensis either with antiserum or with cells. Only some pools of antiserum (15 of 48 pools) and a few batches of cells (three of 11 batches) were protective.

Protective activity was found in serum taken after one infection as frequently as after several infections and gave the same degree of protection. This suggests that second and subsequent infections do not stimulate an anamnestic increase in protective antibodies in the circulation.

Serum and cells taken from the same rats were unrelated in their protective capacity; sometimes serum protected when the cells were ineffective and the reverse also occurred.

Cells transferred from the spleen, peritoneal cavity or mesenteric lymph nodes were capable of initiating reagin formation, irrespective of their ability to protect against N. brasiliensis.

When protection was achieved with transferred cells, the parasite life-cycle was shortened by only 1–2 days.

We have found no evidence that a delayed mechanism of the homograft type is concerned in immunity to N. brasiliensis in the rat.

We thank Miss W. D. Griffiths and Mr A. J. Edwards for their willing assistance. The statistical analysis was kindly done for us by Miss M. V. Mussett of the Statistics Department at our Institute.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Campbell, D. H., Garvey, J. S., Cremer, N. E. & Sussdorf, D. H. (1963). Methods in Immunology. New York: Benjamin.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. C. (1937). Studies on the nature of immunity to intestinal helminths. V. Experiments on the role of the skin in parenteral immunity, and further experiments on passive immunisation in Nippostrongylus infections in rats. Am. J. Hyg. 26, 292308.Google Scholar
Cochrane, C. G. & Dixon, F. J. (1962). Antibody production by transferred cells. Adv. Immunol. 2, 205–39.Google Scholar
Culbertson, J. T. (1942). Passive transfer of immunity to Trichinella spiralis in the rat. J. Parasit. 28, 203–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culbertson, J. T. (1943). Natural transmission of immunity against Trichinella spiralis from mother rats to their offspring. J. Parasit 29, 114–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culbertson, J. T. & Kaplan, S. S. (1938). A study upon passive immunity in experimental trichiniasis. Parasitology 30, 156–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, J. R. (1953). Passive transfer of resistance to Trichinella spiralis in mice. J. Parasit. 39, Suppl. 40 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hunter, G. C. & Leigh, L. C. (1961). Studies on the resistance of rats to the nematode Nippostrongylus muris (Yokagawa, 1920). III. Attempt to transfer immunity adoptively. Parasitology 51, 357–66.Google Scholar
Larsh, J. E., Goulson, H. T. & Weatherly, N. F. (1964). Studies on delayed (cellular) hypersensitivity in mice infected with Trichinella spiralis. II. Transfer of peritoneal exudate cells. J. Parasit. 50, 496–8.Google Scholar
Mulligan, W., Urquhart, G. M., Jennings, F. W. & Neilson, J. T. M. (1965). Immunological studies on Nippostrongylus brasiliensis infections in the rat: the ‘self-cure’ phenomenon. Expl Parasit. 16, 341–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogilvie, B. M. (1965). Role of adult worms in immunity of rats to Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Parasitology 55, 325–35.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, B. M. (1967). Reagin-like antibodies in rats infected with the nematode parasite Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Immunology 12, 113–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Sarles, M. P. (1939). Protective and curative action of immune serum against Nippostrongylus muris in the rat. J. infect. Dis. 65, 183–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarles, M. P. & Talliaferro, W. H. (1936). The local points of defense and the passive transfer of acquired immunity to Nippostrongylus muris in rats. J. infect Dis. 59, 207–20.Google Scholar
Wagland, B. M. & Dineen, J. K. (1965). The cellular transfer of immunity to Trichostrongylus colubriformis in an isogenic strain of guinea pig. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 43, 429–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar