Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:28:36.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parasites as biological models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. D. Smyth
J. D. Smyth
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Australian National University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The value of metazoan parasites as models for the investigation of fundamental biological phenomena is discussed. The fields in which they are of particular value include: immunology, neuromuscular physiology, nucleo-cytoplasmic relationships, genetics, cyto-differentiation, comparative biochemistry.

After reviewing some examples of experimental organisms in trematodes and nematodes, the cestode, Echinococcus granulosus, in particular, is examined as a model.

Problems of particular interest in this organism are: the function of the rostellar gland, whose cells release a secretion which has its origin in the nuclei of these cells; the mode of action of the suckers, which in vivo are thought to remain in a state of sustained contraction; the mode of digestion at the host–parasite interface—membrane digestion appears to be involved; the various modes of membrane transport through the tegument; factors controlling cystic or strobilar differentiation, a problem viewed in the light of the Jacob–Monad model of gene action.

A hypothetical control circuit for differentiation of the stages in parasite life-cycles in general is also put forward.

Some preliminary experiments on the in vitro culture of Taenia serialis, are described. The factors controlling differentiation into cystic or strobilar directions appear to be generally similar to those which operate for Echinococcus granulosus.

It was stressed that many other species of parasites could also serve as models for investigating similar or related problems.

Some of the studies described here were supported by grants from the Australian Wool Board, the U.S. Public Health Service (Grant no. A 107452–02) and the Rural Credits Development Fund.

I am grateful to Mr D. Heath for the provision of the micrographs of Taenia pisiformis and T. serialis in P1. 2, figs. 2, 3.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , February 1969 , pp. 73 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brand, T. von. (1966). Biochemistry of Parasites. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, G. L. & Staveley, J. M. (1957). Blood group P substance in hydatid cyst fluids. Nature, Lond. 179, 147–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, W. H. (1960). Electron microscope studies of nuclear extrusions in pancreatic acinar cells of the rat. J. biophysic. biochem. Cytol. 7, 345–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coutelen, F. (1929). Essai de culture in vitro du Cenure sérial, vesiculation des scolex. C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 100, 619–21.Google Scholar
Dobson, C. (1967). Changes in the protein content of the serum and intestinal mucus of sheep with reference to the biology of the gut and immunological response to Oesophagostomum columbianum infections. Parasitology 57, 201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. & Soulsby, E. J. L. (1968). The development of acquired immunity to tapeworms and progress in research towards active immunization with special reference to Echinococcus spp. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. (in the Press).Google ScholarPubMed
Gergely, J. [ed.] (1964). Biochemistry of Muscle Contraction. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Gurri, J. (1963). Vitalidad y evolutividad de los escolices hidaticos, in vivo e in vitro. An. Fac. Med. Univ. Montevideo 49, 372–81.Google Scholar
Korc, I., Hierro, J., Lasalvia, E., Falco, M. & Calcagno, M. (1967). Chemical characterization of the polysaccharide of the hydatid membrane of Echinococcus granulosus. Expl Parasit. 20, 219–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loomis, W. F. (1959). Control of sexual differentiation in Hydra by pCO2. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 77, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukashenko, N. P. (1964). [Study of the development of Alveococcus multilocularis Leuckart (1863) in vitro. In Russian. Medskaya Parasit. 33, 271–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Mirsky, A. E. (1968). The discovery of DNA. Scientific American 218, 78–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, W. T. J. & Watkins, W. M. (1964). Blood group P substance: (I) Chemical properties. Proc. 9th Congr. int. Soc. Blood Transf. Mexico, pp. 225–9.Google Scholar
Morseth, D. (1967). The fine structure of the hydatid cyst and the protoscolex of Echinococcus granulosus. J. Parasit. 53, 312–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, J. F. (1966). Host parasite relationships as illustrated by the cestode Spirometra mansonoides. In Host–Parasite Relationships. Ed. McCauley, J. E., Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Pauluzzi, S., Sorice, F., Castagnari, L. & Serra, P. (1965). Contributo allo studio delle colture in vitro degli seolici di Echinococous granulosus. Annali Sclavo, Sienna 7, 191–218.Google Scholar
Read, C. P. (1966). Nutrition of intestinal helminths. In Biology of Parasites. Ed. Soulsby, E. J. L.. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rees, G. (1966). Nerve cells in Acanthobothrium coronatum (Rud.) (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea). Parasitology 56, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, W. P. (1962). The Nature of Parasitism. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. P. & Somerville, R. I. (1963). The infective stage of nematode parasites and its significance in parasitism. Adv. Parasit. 2, 109–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, A. H. (1967). Colloid transport in the cestode Hymenolepis diminuta. Expl Parasit. 21, 133–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadun, E. H., Williams, J. S., Meroney, F. C. & Mueller, J. F. (1965). Biochemical changes in mice infected with spargana of the cestode Spirometra mansonoides. J. Parasit. 51, 532–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slais, J. (1966). The importance of the bladder for the development of the cysticercus. Parasitology 56, 707–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, J. D. (1962 a). Introduction to Animal Parasitology. London: English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1962 b). Studies on tapeworm physiology. X. Axenic cultivation of the hydatid organism, Echinococcus granulosus: establishment of a basic technique. Parasitology 54, 515–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1964). Observations on the scolex of Echinococcus granulosus, with special reference to the occurrence and cytochemistry of secretory cells in the rostellum. Parasitology 54, 515–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1967). Studies on tapeworm physiology. XI. In vitro cultivation of Echinococcus granulosus from the protoscolex to the strobilate stage. Parasitology 57, 111–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1969). The Physiology of Cestodes. (In the Press.) London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D., Gemmell, M. A. & Smyth, M. M. (1968). The establishment of Echinococcus granulosus in the intestine of normal and vaccinated dogs. Indian J. Helminth. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D., Howkins, A. B. & Barton, M. (1966). Factors controlling the differentiation of the hydatid organism, Echinococcus granulosus, into cystic or strobilar stages in vitro. Nature, Lond. 211, 1374–7.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D., Miller, H. J. & Howkins, A. B. (1967). Further analysis of the factors controlling strobilization, differentiation and maturation of Echinococcus granulosus in vitro. Expl Parasit. 21, 31–41.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D., Morseth, D. & Smyth, M. M. (1969). Observations on nuclear secretions in the rostellar gland cells of Echinococcus granulosus (Cestoda). The Nucleus (In the press.)Google Scholar
Sommerville, R. I. (1966). The development of Haemonchus contortus to the fourth stage in vitro. J. Parasit. 52, 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprent, J. F. A. (1963). Parasitism. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Ugolev, A. M. (1965). Membrane (contact) digestion. Physiol. Rev. 45, 555–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkins, W. M. & Morgan, W. T. J. (1964). Blood group P1 substance: (II) Immunological properties. Proc. 9th Cong. int. Soc. Blood Transf., Mexico, pp. 230–4.Google Scholar
Webster, G. A. & Cameron, T. W. M. (1963). Some preliminary observations in the development of Echinococcus in vitro. Can. J. Zool. 41, 185–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinmann, C. J. (1966). Immunity mechanisms in cestode infections. In Biology of Parasites. Ed. Soulsby, E. J. L.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J., Ohbayashi, M., Sakamoto, T. & Orihara, M. E. (1962). Studies on echinococcosis. XIII. Observations on the vesicular development of the scolex of E. multilocularis in vitro. Jap. J. vet. Res. 10, 85–96.Google Scholar