Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:49:39.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the transmission, biology and morphology of Echinococcus granulosus equinus, a new subspecies of hydatid tapeworm in horses in Great Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. J. Williams  and
G. K. Sweatman
R. J. Williams
Affiliation:
Hydatid Research Unit, New Zealand Medical Research Council, Medical School, University of Otago
G. K. Sweatman
Affiliation:
Hydatid Research Unit, New Zealand Medical Research Council, Medical School, University of Otago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A 12·8% incidence of hydatid infections occurred in 709 horses examined in England. By contrast, hydatid cysts do not occur in horses in New Zealand where Echinococcus granulosus granulosus is common in sheep, cattle and swine.

2. Experimentally, scolices from hydatid cysts from English horses reached a gravid state in laboratory dogs. It was not possible to infect horses with E. g. granulosus of sheep-dog origin, and only one of two sheep became infected with two cysts following the ingestion of eggs of English horse-dog origin.

3. Our observations, together with those of others on secondary hydatid cyst formation, indicate that the two types are not only biologically but morphologically distinct.

4. In the horse-dog worms, the cirrus sac tilts anteriorly at an acute angle; the testes (about 35) are distributed throughout the proglottid with two or three rows posterior to the vitelline gland, and persist in proglottids when some mature eggs are present; the average length of the rostellar hooks is greater than in E. g. granulosus.

5. It is proposed that the horse-dog material be named E. g. equinus subsp. nov.

6. Rostellar hooks from cysts in British cattle resembled morphologically those from horses, while those from a British sheep and from man were like the hooks from hydatid cysts in man and livestock in New Zealand.

7. A red deer, hedgehog and European rabbit were not infected artificially following the ingestion of eggs of E. g. equinus.

Mr J. T. Briggs, Chief Public Health Inspector, Public Health Department, Bently, Doncaster, England, was responsible for the inspection of the British horses reported in this paper. We are indebted to Mr Briggs for this courtesy and for sending us fresh hydatid cysts from horses for experimental purposes. Mr N. Aitken was responsible for maintaining the experimental horses in an area of New Zealand known to be free of E. granulosus. Our thanks are also due to Messrs G. D. Page, D. V. Weston, Miss L. A. Duncan and Mrs B. R. Clarke for their able technical assistance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 53 , Issue 3-4 , November 1963 , pp. 391 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, A. J. (1956). Hydatid cysts. Vet. Rec. 68, 130.Google Scholar
Bacigalupo, J. (1933). L'échinococcose secondaire d'origine digestive chez le cobaye. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 114, 390.Google Scholar
Barnett, L. E. (1941). Echinococcosis alveolaris (alveolar hydatid disease), associated with ordinary hydatid cysts of the liver. Aust. N.Z. J. Surg. 10, 317–27.Google Scholar
Barvaux, — & Derzelle, E. (1947). L'échinococcose équine. Ann. Méd. Vét. 91, 241–3.Google Scholar
Baxter, J. T., Harper, W. O. & Bell, D. (1956). Hydatid disease. Vet. Rec. 68, 104.Google Scholar
Benoit, R. (1935). Contribution à l'étude des nodules et des kystes parasitaires du foie chez le cheval. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilk. 77, 462–70.Google Scholar
Beresford-Jones, W. P. (1961). Observations on the helminths of British wild red foxes. Vet. Rec. 73, 882–3.Google Scholar
Biocca, E. & Massi, O. (1952). Il problema della echinococcosi in Italia: Indagini e considerazioni. Riv. Parassit. 13, 235–40.Google Scholar
Brachetka, J. (1943). Echinococcus polymorphus in der Glutaealmuskulatur beim Pferde. Berl. Münch. tierärztl. Wschr. 15/16, 113.Google Scholar
Brailsford, J. F. (1926). The X-ray diagnosis of animal parasites (helminthes) in man. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 19 (Sect. Electro-therap.), 41–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Bronzini, E. & Bertolino, P. (1958). Indagini sperimentali sulla specificità dell’ Echinococcus granulosus allo stato adulto. Boll. Zool. 21, 219–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M. (1926). Observations on the genus Echinococcus Rudolphi, 1801. J. Helminth. 4, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordy, O. R. & Eastlick, M. G. (1951). A report of Echinococcus granulosus in a horse in the state of Washington. J. Parasit. 37, 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutelen, F., Lecroart, D. & Cochet, G. (1939). Sur la réceptivité de la souris blanche à l'échinococcose secondaire expérimentale, par inoculation intrapéritonéale de sable hydatique d'hydatides échinococciques du cheval. Ann. Parasit. hum. comp. 17, 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dévé, F. (1935). Réceptivité de la souris opposée à la résistance du lapin à l'inoculation de sable échinococcique de cheval. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 119, 351–2.Google Scholar
Dévé, F. (1938). Au sujet de la résistance du lapin à l'inoculation du sable échinococcique de kystes hydatiques de cheval. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 128, 340–2.Google Scholar
Dévé, F. (1949). L'échinococcose primitive (maladie hydatique), 362 pp. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Drežančić, I. & Wikerhauser, T. (1956). Prilog eksperimentalnoj invaziji mačke i lisice s Echinococcus granulosus. Vet. Arhiv. 26, 179–82.Google Scholar
Gallo, C. (1955). L'echinococcosi e la distomatosi negli equini in Sicilia. Atti Soc. Ital. Sc. Vet. 9, 689–91.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. (1957). The fox as a host of Echinococcus spp. and its possible role in the spread of hydatid disease. Vet. Rec. 69, 1018–19.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. (1959). Hydatid disease in Australia. VI. Observations on the Carnivora of New South Wales as definitive hosts of Echinococcus granulosus (Batsch, 1786), (Rudolphi, 1801) and their role in the spread of hydatidiasis in domestic animals. Aust. Vet. J. 35, 450–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hässler, L. (1962). Ett fall av echinococcus hos häst. Medlemsbl. Sverig. Vetförb. 14, 356.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. F. (1956). Hydatid cysts. Vet. Rec. 68, 130.Google Scholar
Hutchison, W. F. & Bryan, Mildred W. (1960). Studies on the hydatid worm Echinococcus granulosus. I. Species identification of the parasite found in Mississippi. Amer. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 9, 606–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ibscher, K. (1935). Bemerkenswerte Fleischbeschaubefunde. I. Echinokokken beim Pferde. Z. Fleisch- u. Milchhyg. 45, 187–8.Google Scholar
Jansen, Jr. J. (1961). Echinococcus granulosus bij het edelhert (Cervus elaphus). Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 86, 82–4.Google Scholar
Lörincz, F. (1933). Die Rolle der Katze in der Verbreitung der Echinococcosis. Zbl. Bakt. 129, 1–11.Google Scholar
Lörincz, F., Burghoffer, G. & Bodrogi, G. Y. (1932). Beitrag zur Echinokokkenkrankheit in Ungarn. Zbl. Bakt. 124, 16–22.Google Scholar
Matoff, K. N. & Jantscheff, J. (1954). Kann Echinococcus granulosus im Darm des Fuchses (Canis vulpes) sich zur Geschlechtsreife entwickeln? Acta Vet. Budapest, 4, 411–8.Google Scholar
Matoff, K. N. & Tierarzt, J. J. (1950). Entwickelt sich Echinococcus granulosus normal im Darm des Fuchses (Canis vulpes)? Fac. Méd. Vét. 26, 249–57.Google Scholar
Mazzotti, L. (1958). Resultados negativos de la infección experimental de seis zorras de la especie Urocyon cinereoargenteus, con Echinococcus granulosus. Rev. Inst. Salubr. Enferm. trop., Méx., 18, 63–6.Google Scholar
Miller, W. C. & Poynter, D. (1956). Hydatid cysts in a thoroughbred mare. Vet. Rec. 68, 51–3.Google Scholar
Ortlepp, R. J. (1934). Echinococcus in dogs from Pretoria and vicinity. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sc. 3, 97–108.Google Scholar
Pierotti, P. (1954). Echinococcosi in equino. Atti. Soc. Ital. Sc. Vet. 8, 692–4.Google Scholar
Pullar, E. M. (1946). A survey of Victorian canine and vulpine parasites. I. Material and methods used in the investigation. II. Taenia multiceps, Taenia ovis and Echinococcus granulosus. Aust. Vet. J. 22, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rausch, R. (1952). Studies on the helminth fauna of Alaska. XI. Helminth parasites of microtine rodents—taxonomic considerations. J. Parasit. 38, 415–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rausch, R. (1953). The taxonomic value and variability of certain structures in the cestode genus Echinococcus (Rud., 1801) and a review of recognised species. Thapar Commen. Vol., Lucknow, pp. 233–46.Google Scholar
Sáiz Moreno, D. L. (1953). Problema sanitario de la hidatidosis en España. Arch. Int. Hidatid. 13, 363–78.Google Scholar
Sáiz Moreno, D. L. (1957). Estado actual de lucha contra la hidatidosis en España. Arch. Int. Hidatid. 16, 111–8.Google Scholar
Schmid, R. (1958). Die Echinokokken-Krankheit in der Schweiz, 1926–1955. Acta Trop., Basel, 15, 65–81.Google Scholar
Seddon, H. R. (1950). Diseases of Domestic Animals in Australia. Part I. Helminth Infestations. Commonwealth of Australia, Dep. Health Service Publication (Div. Vet. Hyg.), no. 5, 233 pp.Google Scholar
Sinclair, K. B. (1956). Echinococcus infection in the fox. Vet. Rec. 68, 104.Google Scholar
Sinclair, K. B. (1957). Echinococcus infection in the fox. Vet. Rec. 69, 1076.Google Scholar
Smith, K. J. (1955). The discovery of Echinococcus granulosus in an Irish reared dog. Irish Vet. J. 9, 198–9.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1962). Studies on tapeworm physiology. X. Axenic cultivation of the hydatid organism, Echinococcus granulosus; establishment of a basic technique. Parasitology, 52, 441–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweatman, G. K. (1952). Distribution and incidence of Echinococcus granulosus in man and other animals with special reference to Canada. Canad. publ. Hlth. J. 43, 480–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Sweatman, G. K. & Williams, R. J. (1962). Wild animals in New Zealand as hosts of Echinococcus granulosus and other taeniid tapeworms. Trans. Roy. Soc. New Zealand. (Zoology), 2, 221–50.Google Scholar
Sweatman, G. K. & Williams, R. J. (1963). Comparative studies on the biology and morphology of Echinococcus granulosus from domestic livestock, moose and reindeer. Parasitology, 53, 339–390CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vergani, S. F. (1959). Un caso de quiste hidatidico en un equino de Venezuela. Bol. Inst. Invest. Vet. Caracas, 10/11, 41–4.Google Scholar
Vogel, H. (1957). Über den Echinococcus multilocularis Süddeutschlands. I. Das Bandwurmstadium von Stämmen menschlicher und tierischer Herkunft. Z. Tropenmed. u. Parasit. 8, 404–54.Google Scholar
Vogel, H. (1960). Tiere als natürliche Wirte des Echinococcus multilocularis in Europa. Z. Tropenmed. u. Parasit. 11, 36–42.Google Scholar
Vuillaume, R. (1957). L'hydatidose en France. Arch. Int. Hidatid. 16, 137–42.Google Scholar
Waele, A. De & Pennoit-De Cooman, E. (1938). Étude expérimentale de l'échinococcose secondaire. Ann. Parasit. hum. comp. 16, 121–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A. I. (1962). Echinococcus granulosus from English dogs. Can. J. Zool. 40, 195–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar