Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:58:04.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Classification of the Ascaridae. III. A Revision of the Genus Dujardinia Gedoelst, with a Description of a new Genus of Anisakinae from a Crocodile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. A. Baylis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The genus Dujardinia was proposed by Gedoelst (1916) for the reception of a form considered to be identical with Ascaris helicina Molin, 1860. In the same paper another species, Ascaris nigra, was described by Gedoelst, who mentions that it has close affinities with A. helicina, but does not actually refer it to Dujardinia. The present writer (1920) assigned Ascaris halicoris Owen, 1833, to this genus. More recent work renders it somewhat doubtful whether this species really belongs to Dujardinia, for reasons which will be pointed out later, and though for the present it is retained, it must be regarded as a somewhat aberrant form.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 1923 , pp. 223 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baird, W. (1859). Description of a rare Entozoon from the stomach of the Dugong. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 148–149, Pl. LVI.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. (1920). On the Classification of the Ascaridae. I. The systematic value of certain characters of the Alimentary Canal. Parasitology, XII. 3. 253–264.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. and Daubney, R. (1922). Report on the Parasitic Nematodes in the Collection of the Zoological Survey of India. Mem. Ind. Mus. VII. 4. 263–347.Google Scholar
Drasche, R. Von (1883). Revision der in der Nematoden-Sammlung des k. k. Zool. Hofcabinetes befindl. Original-Exemplare Diesing's und Molin's. Verh. k. k. Zool-Bot. Ges., Wien, XXXII. 117–138, Pls. VII–X.Google Scholar
Gedoelst, L. (1916). Notes sur la Faune parasitaire du Congo belge. Rev. Zool. Afric., Bruxelles, V. 1. 1–90.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von (1906 a). Ascaris halicoris Baird. Journ. and Proc. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, I. 10. 258–260, Pl. XI.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von (1906 b). Neue und bekannte Hehninthen. Zool. Jahrb., Syst., XXIV. 1–20, Pl. I.Google Scholar
Molin, R. (1860). Trenta specie di Nematoidi. Sitz. k. Akad. Wiss., Wien, XL. 9. 331–358.Google Scholar
Owen, R. (1833). Descriptive and illustrated Catalogue of the Physiological Series…in the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons in London, I. xvi + 271 pp., 13 pls.Google Scholar
Parona, C. (1889). Intorno all' Ascaris halicoris Owen, etc. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Genova (2) VII. (XXVII.), 751–764, Pl. XIII.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. (1916). Parasitic Trematodes and Nematodes, etc. Scientif. Res. Zool. Exp. Brit. E. Africa and Uganda made by Prof. V. Dogiel and I. Sokolow in the year 1914. Petrograd, I. 4. Russian, 1–98; English translation, 99–157, Pls. I–X.Google Scholar
Travassos, L. (1920). Contribuição para a Sistematica dos Ascaroidea. Arch. da Esc. Sup. de Agric. e Med. Veter., Nictheroy, IV. 1. 15.Google Scholar
Wedl, K. (1862). Zur Helminthenfauna Ägyptens (2 Abth.). Sitz. k. Akad. Wiss., Wien, XLIV. 1. 463–482, Pls. I–III.Google Scholar