Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:03:06.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On some British Larval Cestodes from Land and Fresh-water Invertebrate Hosts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

W. F. Harper
W. F. Harper
Affiliation:
From the Department of Natural History, University College (University of St Andrews), Dundee.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ten larval Cestodes, eight from aquatic and two from terrestrial hosts, have been described. Of these, eight species are new, and in the case of Cysticercus “A,” both larva and adult are new. By direct animal experiment the life-histories of three forms have been definitely established, while by careful comparison of the hooks of the scolex two larvae have been related to known adults. Cysticercus Hymenolepidis setigerae, previously recorded only from Copepods, is described here from an Ostracod host.

Effect of the parasite on the host. It is difficult to estimate the effect of Cestode larvae parasitic in Invertebrata, especially in the smaller forms such as the Entomostraca. In the latter, I have found that the intestine and musculature suffer most, and that the reproductive organs remain unattacked. The same remarks also hold for Oligochaete hosts. Dady (1901) considers that the influence of these cystic stages on their hosts is considerable, particularly on the musculature, sexual organs and intestine, and that death of the host may follow. Lindner (1921) states that little or no harm is done to Ostracods by the presence of tapeworm larvae, and also that the ovary of the female remains unattacked. The same author considers that, among the Entomostraca, destruction of the intestine occurs only in Copepods, the body cavity of Ostracods being so roomy that a harming of the intestine by growth of the parasite is unlikely. Schmidt (1894) finds that for Cysticercus Hymenolepidis anatinae, the host, Cypris ovata, was not particularly affected.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , March 1930 , pp. 202 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dady, E. V. (1901). Helminthologische Studien. Einige in Süsswasser Entomostraken lebende Cercocystes Formen. Zool. Jahrb. Syst. 14, 161–214.Google Scholar
Harper, W. F. (1929). On the Structure and Life-histories of British Fresh-water Larval Trematodes. Parasitology, 21, 189–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindner, E. (1921). Die Bedeutung des Cysticerkusschwanzes. Biol. Ztrbl. 41, 36–41.Google Scholar
v. Linstow, O. (1875). Beobachtungen an neuen und bekannten Helminthen. Arch. f. Naturgesch. 41, 183–207.Google Scholar
v. Linstow, O. (1892 a). Beobachtungen an Helminthenlarven. Arch. mikr. Anat. 39, 325–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
v. Linstow, O. (1892 b). Beobachtungen and Vogeltänien. Centralb. f. Bakt. u. Parasit. 12, 501–4.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1910). Cestodes in Die Süsswasserfauna Deutschlands, herausg. von Brauer, Heft 18.Google Scholar
Moniez, R. (1891). Notes sur les helminthes. Revue biol. du Nord de la France, 4e Ann. 25.Google Scholar
Mrazek, A. (1890). O cysticerkoidech nasich korýšů sladkovodních. [Ueber die Cysticerkoiden unserer Süsswasserkrustaceen.] Věstnik Král. spol. nauk v Praze, 1, 226–48. (Ref. in Centralb. f. Bakt. u. Parasit. 1890, 8, 628–30.)Google Scholar
Mrazek, A. (1891). Recherches sur le développement de quelques Ténias des oiseaux. Sitzungsber. d. k. böhm. Ges. 1891.Google Scholar
Mrazek, A. (1907). Cestoden Studien I. Cysticercoiden aus Lumbriculus variegatus. Zool. Jahrb. Syst. 24, 591–624.Google Scholar
Mrazek, A. (1916). Die morphologische Bedeutung der Cestodenlarve. Zool. Jahrb. Anat. 39.Google Scholar
Ratzel, F. (1866). Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Cestoden. Arch. f. Naturgesch. 34, Bd. 1.Google Scholar
Rosseter, T. B. (1890).Cysticercoids parasitic in Cypris cinerea. J. Micr. and Nat. Sc. 30, 241.Google Scholar
Rosseter, T. B. (1891). Sur un cysticercoïde des Ostracodes, capable de se développer dans l'intestin du canard. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, 16, 224–9.Google Scholar
Rosseter, T. B. (1892). On a new Cysticercus and a new tapeworm. J. Quek. micr. Club, 2, T. 4, No. 30, 361–6.Google Scholar
Rosseter, T. B. (1893). On the Cysticercus of Taenia microsoma and a new Cysticercus from Cyclops agilis. J. Quek. micr. Club T. 5, No. 32, 178–82.Google Scholar
Rosseter, T. B. (1894). On Cysticercoides quadricurvatus in Cyclops agilis. J. Quek. micr. Club No. 34, 338.Google Scholar
Rosseter, T. B. (1897). (1)Cysticercus venusta (Rosseter). (2) Cysticercus of Taenia liophallus. (3) On experimental infection of ducks with Cysticercus coronula Mrazek (Rosseter), Cysticercus gracilis v. Linst. and Cysticercus tenuirostris Hamann. J. Quek. micr. Club No. 40, 305.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. E. (1894). Die Entwicklungsgeschichte und der anatomische Bau der Taenia anatina Krabbe. Arch. f. Naturgesch. 60, 65–112.Google Scholar
Stephenson, J. (1926). A description of two Scottish Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9), 18, 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villot, A. (1883). Mémoire sur les Cysticerques des Ténias. Ann. de. Sci. Nat. 6 Sér. T. 15, No. 4, 61 pp.Google Scholar