Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:08:32.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Ilisha parthenogenetica, Southwell and Baini Prashad, 1918, from the Pyloric Caeca of a Fish, Hilsa ilisha (Ham. Buch.), and a Comparison with other Plerocercoid Larvae of Cestodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

W. N. F. Woodland
W. N. F. Woodland
Affiliation:
Wellcome Bureau of Scientific Research, London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1918 Southwell and Baini Prashad1 published a description of an unsegmented Cestode parasite—Ilisha parthenogenetica—which they discovered in the “mesentery” of the common edible Indian Shad, Hilsa ilisha. This minute parasite, according to these authors, “appears to be of very great systematic importance, and…further reproduces itself in a manner not before known amongst the Cestoda.” In justification of these general remarks, they make, among others, the following statements: (1) the parasite, though of the well-known Piestocystis larva type, becomes sexually mature and resides in a cyst formed from the tissues of the mesentery; (2) these cysts are so numerous in every individual fish examined that the mesentery becomes transformed into “a massive liver-like organ in which the various coils of the intestine appeared merely as tubes embedded therein”; (3) though two lateral main excretory canals are described, yet there is no terminal excretory aperture: the excretory system “is closed in all stages of [the parasite's] life-history”; (4) the whole of the parenchyma is “filled up with enormous numbers of minute egg-cells. Besides the eggs, morulae and other higher stages in the development of the young were also present in the intima.” In other words, the egg-cells “develop in the body of the parent to form young worms identical in structure and appearance with the parent”; (5) the young worms “escape through a temporary aperture which is formed in the middle of the rostellum, anteriorly,” and, when the old cyst has been ruptured, they become “scattered in the mesentery, the [new] cyst not having been secreted at this stage.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1923 , pp. 128 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alessandrini, G. (1907). Sur un Dithyridium, Rud. del Polmone di Gallina. Boll. Soc. Zool. Ital., Ser. 2, VIII. 49.Google Scholar
Beneden van, P.-J. (1850). Recherches sur la Faune Littorale de Belgique. Les Vers Cestoïdes. Mém. Acad. Roy. de Belgique, XXV.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. R. (1915). Contributions to the Life History of Proteocephalus ambloplitis, Leidy, a Parasite of the Black Bass. Contrib. Canadian Biology, Suppl. 47th Ann. Rep. Depart. Mar. Fish., Fasc. II. 177.Google Scholar
Curtis, W. C. (1911). The Life History of the Scolex Polymorphus of the Woods Hole Region. Jour. Morph. Phil. XXII. 819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daday, E. v. (1910–1911). Untersuchungen über die Süsswasser-Mikrofauna Deutsch-Ostafrikas. Zoologica, XXIII. 42.Google Scholar
Diesing, C. M. (1850). Systema Helminthum, I.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. (1854), Über eine naturgemässe Vertheilung der Cephalocotyleen. Sitz.-Ber. Math.-Naturw. Cl. Kais. Akad. Wiss. Wien, XIII. 556.Google Scholar
Fraipont, J. (1881). Recherches sur l'Appareil Excréteur des Trématodes et des Cestodes. Archiv. de Biol. II. 1.Google Scholar
Hill, J. P. (1894). A Contribution to a further Knowledge of the Cystic Cestodes. Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. Wales, 2nd Ser. IX. 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linstow, v. (1892). Beobachtungen an Helminthenlarven. Archiv f. Mikr. Anat. XXXIX. 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meggitt, F. J. (1914). The Structure and Life-History of a Tapeworm (Ichthyotaenia filicollis, Rud.) parasitic in the Stickleback. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, I. 113.Google Scholar
Monticelli, Fr. Sav. (1888). Contribuzioni allo Studio della Fauna Elmintologica del Golfo di Napoli. I. Ricerche sullo Scolex polymorphus, Rud. Mitth. Zool. Stat. zu Neapel, VIII. 85.Google Scholar
Mrázek, Al. (1915–1916). Cestoden-Studien. II. Die Morphologische Bedeutung der Cestoden-Larven. Zool. Jahrbüch. Jena, Anat. XXXIX. 515.Google Scholar
Mueller, O. F. (1787). Verzeich. bish. entdeck. Engeweidewürmer, Thiere etc. Naturforsch., Halle, XXII. 33.Google Scholar
Rosseter, T. B. (1891). On a new Cysticercus and a new Tapeworm. Jour. Quekett Micros. Club, 2nd Ser. IV. 361.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1898). Note Parassitologiche. Boll. Soc. Adriatica Sci. Nat. Trieste, XVIII. 1.Google Scholar
Valenciennes, M. (1844). Observation d'une Espèce de Ver de la Cavité Abdominale d'un Lézard vert-piqueté des Environs de Paris, le Dithyridium lacertae, Nob. Ann. d. Sciences Nat., 3rd Ser., Zool., II. 248.Google Scholar
Vaullegeard, A. (1895). Sur les Helminthes des Crustacés, Décapodes, Brachyoures et Anomoures. C. R. Trav. Assoc. Franç. Avance. Sciences, 24 Session, Bordeaux, Part II. 662.Google Scholar
Wagner, O. (1916). Über den Entwicklungsgang einer Fischtänie. Zool. Anzeig. XLVI. 70.Google Scholar
Wellman, C. and Wherry, W. B. (1910). Some new Internal Parasites of the Californian Ground Squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi). Parasitology, III. 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wundsch, H. H. (1912). Neue Plerocercoïde aus Marinen Copepoden. Archiv Naturgesch. LXXVIII. Abth. A, Heft 9, p. 1.Google Scholar
Zschokke, F. (1889). Recherches sur la Structure Anatomique et Histologique des Cestodes. Mém. de l'Inst. Nat. Genevois, XVII.Google Scholar