Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:17:04.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on the Sporozoa Inhabiting the Gut of the Polychaete Worm Polydora flava Claparède1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. Ralph Fowell
Affiliation:
From the Department of Zoology, King's College, University of London

Extract

1. A detailed description is given of a coccidian which parasitises the nuclei of the intestinal cells of the polychaete worm Polydora flava Claparède. The final stages in sporogony have not been observed; nevertheless, this is the first record, from an annelid worm, of an eimeriid which shows a striking resemblance to those Coccidia occurring in the higher animals. It is also the first record of an intranuclear parasite from an annelid.

2. From the gut of the same worm, a new species of Selenidium is described. It differs from all other species, hitherto recorded, in the possession of an axial tube, which completely encloses the nucleus and extends from one end of the organism to the other: hence it is proposed to name this organism Selenidium axiferens. The anterior end of the trophozoite shows a circlet of siderophilous bodies, which Ray (1930 a) has shown to be characteristic of the genus.

3. Both uninucleate and multinucleate intracellular forms, with polar groups of chromatic globules, have been discovered in great abundance on six occasions; no merozoites have been found, but evidence is submitted to show that these intracellular forms represent the schizogonic phase in the life-cycle of the Selenidium.

4. Sporogony follows closely that described for other species, but the final stages have not been observed. The gametocysts measure 48 × 50–70 × 63μ.

5. Association and cyst formation are described in Polyrhabdina polydorae Caul. & Mesn. (?) for the first time. Innumerable nuclei make their appearance in each gametocyte, before ejection of the cysts into the sea-water takes place. Gametocysts can easily be distinguished from those of Selenidium axiferens, not only by their morphology, but also by their greater size (98 × 90–105 × 100μ).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brasil, L. (1909). Documents sur quelques sporozoaires d'annélides. Arch. Protistenk. 10, 107.Google Scholar
Brasil, L. & Fantham, H. B. (1907). Sur l'existenee chez les Sipunculides des schizogrégarines appartenant à la famille Selenidiidae. C.R. Acad, Sci., Paris, 144, 518.Google Scholar
Caullery, M. & Mesnil, F. (1899). Sur quelques parasites internes des annélides. Trav. Sta. zool. Wimereux, 7, 80.Google Scholar
Debaisieux, P. (1922). Note sur deux coccidies des mollusques: Pseudoklossia (?) potellae et P. chitonis. Cellule, 32, 233.Google Scholar
Dehorne, A. (1930). Sur l'Aggregata de Nereis diversicolor. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 103, 665.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. (1925). The life-history and chromosome cycle of Aggregata eberthi. Parasitology, 17, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, C. A. (1933). Studies on some new ophidian and avian Coccidia from Uganda, with a revision of the classification of the Eimeriidea. Parasitology 25, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, I. (1914). Studies on some sporozoan parasites of sipuneuloids. II. Dobellia binucleata n.g., n.sp.; a new coccidian from the gut of Petalostoma minutum Keferst. Arch. Protistenk. 33, 205.Google Scholar
La Cour, L. (1931). Improvements in everyday technique in plant cytology. J. roy. micr. Soc. 51, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laveran, A. & Mesnil, F. (1902). Sur deux coccidies intestinales de la Rana esculenta. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 54, 857.Google Scholar
Lermantoff, E. (1913). über Myriospora trophoniae n.gen., n.sp., ein neues, in Trophonia plumosa parasitierendes Coccidium. Arch. Protistenk. 32, 205.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, D. L. & Ray, H. N. (1931). Observations on dicystid gregarines from marine worms. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 74, 439.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, D. L. & Ray, H. N. (1933). The life-cycle of two species of “Selenidium” from the polychaete worm Potamilla reniformis. Parasitology, 25, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mingazzini, P. (1891). Gregarine monocistidee nuove o poco conosciute, del Golfo di Napoli. R.C. Accad. Lincei, 7, 467.Google Scholar
Naville, A. (1927). Recherches sur le cycle évolutif et chromosomique de Klossia helicina Schneid. Arch. Protistenk. 54, 427.Google Scholar
Ray, H. N. (1930 a). Studies on some Sporozoa in polychaete worms. I. Gregarines of the genus Selenidium. Parasitology, 22, 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, H. N. (1930 b). Studies on some Sporozoa in polychaete worms. II. Parasitology 22, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, N. (1933). Sporogony in Selenidium mesnili Brasil, a sporozoan parasite of Myxicola infundibulum Mont. Parasitology 25, 402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassuchin, D. (1935). Zum Studium der Protisten- und Bakterienkerne. Mitteilung I. Arch. Protistenk. 84, 186.Google Scholar
Schaudinn, F. (1902). Studien über krankheitserregende Protozoen. I. Cyclospora caryolytica Schaud., der Erreger der perniciösen Enteritis des Maulwurfs. Arb. Gesundh Amt., Berl. 18, 378.Google Scholar
Sergent, E. (1902). Sur une coccidie nouvelle parasite du caméléon vulgaire. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 54, 1260.Google Scholar
Siedlecki, M. (1907). O budowie i Rozwoju Caryotropha mesnili. (Étude la structure et du cycle évolutif de Caryotropha mesnili.) Bull. int. Acad. Cracovie, p. 453.Google Scholar
Simond, P. L. (1896). Note sur le dimorphisme évolutif de la coccidie appelée Karyophagus salamandrae Steinh. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 48, 1061.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. A. (1930). Sur le sporozoaire (coccidie) parasite de Nereis diversicolor. C.R. Soc. Biol. 104, 138.Google Scholar
Watson, M. E. (1916). Studies on gregarines. Illinois biol. Monogr. No. 2.Google Scholar