Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:57:45.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on the scolex of Echinococcus granulosus, with special reference to the occurrence and cytochemistry of secretory cells in the rostellum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. D. Smyth
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

Extract

1. The mode of attachment of Echinococcus granulosus to the dog intestine was examined.

2. In an attached worm, the scolex was found to penetrate deeply into the crypts of Lieberkühn, with the rostellum fully extended, the hooks penetrating the epithelium lightly and each sucker holding a ‘plug’ of mucous cells in its cavity.

3. The expansion of the rostellar tip was aided by a muscular disk, the rostellar pad, which probably assists attachment by forcing the hooks outwards.

4. The epithelium in the region of the suckers showed eosinophilic reactions which may indicate a mild host reaction.

5. The existence of a small group of spindle-shaped secretory cells which form a rostellar gland, lying immediately anterior to the rostellar pad, is reported. This gland was found to be the source of secretion droplets seen to be released in vitro from the scolex region.

6. The secretion droplets were found to be exceptionally labile and not preserved in the rostellar gland cells by routine fixation methods. Prolonged fixation (5–12 months) in formol (7% formaldehyde) gave excellent preservation but globules were fairly well preserved after 3 months fixation. Fixation in Baker's formol-calcium for 2 weeks followed by controlled chromation was also found to retain the secretion reasonably well but not as adequately as the prolonged fixation.

7. The secretion was found to be negative to the PAS, bromo-phenol blue (with Hg), and ninhydrin-Schiff reactions. The areas adjacent to the globules gave a protein reaction and the periphery of the globules appeared dark by phase contrast microscopy.

8. The secretion was weakly positive to performic acid-Schiff and gave strong reactions with Sudan Black after controlled chromation, both in frozen and wax sections. These results suggest that the secretion may be a liproprotein or a lipid-protein coacervate but it is recognized that confirmation by biochemical methods is desirable.

9. The possible immunological implications of these results are discussed.

This work was supported by the Australian Wool Research Committee and the U.S. Public Health Service Grant No. E. 4707–02. The technical assistance of Mrs A. L. Warrener and Mr A. B. Howkins is gratefully acknowledged.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baczynska, H. (1914). Études anatomiques et histologiques sur quelques nouvelles espèces de cestodes d'oiseaux. Bull. Soc. neuchâtel. Sci. nat. 40, 187239.Google Scholar
Baer, J. G. (1956). Parasitic helminths collected in West Greenland. Medd. Grønland. 124, 155.Google Scholar
Coutelen, F., Biquet, J., Doby, J. -M. & Deblock, St (1952). Le système musculaire du scolex échinococcique. Ann. Parasit. hum. comp. 27, 8694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dévé, F. (1949). L' Échinococcose Primitive. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Farooqi, H. U. (1958). The occurrence of certain specialized glands in the rostellum of Taenia solium L. Z. Parasitenk. 18, 308–11.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1918). Cestodes d'oiseaux de la Nouvelle-Calédonie et des Îles Loyalty. (Sarasin et Roux) Nova Caledonia. Archs. Zool. exp. gén., 2, 397449.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1920). Die Cestoden der deutschen Südpolar-Expedition, 1901–1903. In Dtsch. Sudpolar-Expedition. Zoologie, 16, 467524.Google Scholar
Furhmann, O. (1933). Un cestode aberrant. Bull. Soc. neuchâtel Sci. nat. 58, 107–20.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. (1962). Natural and acquired immunity factors interfering with development during the rapid growth phase of Echinococcus granulosus in dogs. Immunology, 5, 496503.Google ScholarPubMed
Hollman, K. H. (1959). L'ultrastructure de la glande mammaire normale de la souris en lactation. Étude au microscope electronique. J. Ultra. Res. 2, 423–49.Google Scholar
Kühlow, F. von (1953). Bau und Differentialdiagnose heimischer Diphyllobothrium-Plerocercoide. Z. Tropenmed. u. Parasit. 4, 186202.Google Scholar
Mazia, D., Brewer, P. & Alfert, M. (1953). Cytochemical staining and measurement of protein with bromophenol blue. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, 104, 5667.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. F. (1937). A repartition of the genus Diphyllobothrium. J. Parasit. 23, 308–10.Google Scholar
Nybelin, O. (1931). Säugetier- und Vogelcestoden von Juan Fernandez. Nat. hist. Juan Fernandez and Easter Island, Uppsala (Zool.) 3, 493524.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. S. (1960). Histochemistry: Theoretical and Applied, 2nd ed. London: Churchill and Co.Google Scholar
Rees, G. (1958). A comparison of the structure of the scolex of Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller 1766) and Clestobothrium crassiceps (Reid 1819), and the mode of attachment of the scolex to the intestine of the host. Parasitology, 48, 468–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, G. (1961). Studies on the functional morphology of the scolex and of the genitalia in Echinobothrium brachysoma Pinter and E. affine Diesing from Raja clavata L. Parasitology, 51, 193226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, A. H. (1963). Electron microscope studies of tapeworms: the surface structures of Hymenolepis diminuta (Rudolphi, 1819) Blanchard, 1891. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc. 82, 2230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (1907). Cestoda: In National Antarctic Expedition, 1901–1907. Natural History, Vol. 3. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Silverman, P. H. & Maneely, R. B. (1955). Studies on the biology of some tapeworms of the genus Taenia. III. The role of the secreting gland of the hexacanth embryo in the penetration of the intestinal mucosa of the intermediate host, and some of its histochemical reactions. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 49, 326–30.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1963). Secretory activity by the scolex of Echinococcus granulosus in vitro. Nature, Lond., 199, 402.Google Scholar
Spasskii, A. A. (1961). Essentials of Cestodology. Vol. 1. Anoplocephalate Tapeworms of Domestic and Wild Animals (English translation of 1951 Edition). Moscow: Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R.Google Scholar
Stirewalt, M. A. & Kruidenier, F. J. (1961). Activity of the acetabular secretory apparatus of cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni under experimental conditions. Expl Parasit. 11, 191211.Google Scholar
Subhapradha, C. K. (1951). On the genus Polypocephalus Braun, 1878 (Cestoda), together with the description of six new species from Madras. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 121, 205–35.Google Scholar
Wardle, R. A. & McLeod, J. A. (1952). The Zoology of Tapeworms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wolffhügel, K. (1938). Nematoparataeniidae. Skolex und Verdauung. Z. InfektKr. Haustiere, 53, 942.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J., Okbayashi, M. & Konno, S. (1956). Studies on Echinococcosis. III. On experimental infection in dogs especially on the development of Echinococcus granulosus Batsch, 1786. Jap. J. vet. Res. 4, 113–22.Google Scholar
Yasuma, A. & Ichikawa, T. (1953). Ninhydrin-Schiff and alloxan-Schiff staining. A new histochemical staining method for protein. J. Lab. clin. Med. 41, 296–9.Google ScholarPubMed