Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:15:41.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Flagellates of the Genera Trichomonas and Eutrichomastix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

B. M. Das Gupta
B. M. Das Gupta
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Protozoology, Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Three pure-line strains started from single individuals, 2 of Trichomonas and 1 of Eutrichomastix, all from snakes, were isolated from mixed cultures. These strains, and another of Eutrichomastix from a chamaeleon, were under observation for periods of from 3 to 10 weeks.

The Eutrichomastix of snakes does not differ from that of the chamaeleon in any essential point, and neither developed an undulating membrane at any time during this prolonged period of observation.

The Trichomonas of the grass-snake is morphologically distinct from that of the boa. Trichomonas of the boa has an ill-developed undulating membrane with only a few shallow waves, and may simulate a Eutrichomastix owing to the accidental detachment of the bordering flagellum.

Trichomonas from snakes, as from most other hosts, readily feeds upon starch granules, whereas none of the Eutrichomastix were found to ingest unaltered starch.

Eutrichomastix from snakes and the chamaeleon never develops an undulating membrane and does not assume a Trichomonas form.

From these observations it can be definitely concluded that Trichomonas and Eutrichomastix are generically distinct.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , March 1936 , pp. 195 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexeieff, A. (1910). Sur les flagellés intestinaux des poissons marins (note préliminaire). Arch. Zool. exp. gén. 6, N. and R. p. i.Google Scholar
Bernstain, T. (1928). Untersuchungen an Flagellaten aus dem Darmkanal der Termiten aus Turkestan. Arch. Protistenk. 61, 9.Google Scholar
Bishop, A. (1931). The morphology and method of division of Trichomonas. Parasitology, 23, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braune, R. (1913). Untersuchungen über die im Wiederkäuermagen vorkommenden Protozoen. Arch. Protistenk. 32, 111.Google Scholar
Bütschli, O. (1884). Mastigophora. In Bronn's Klass. u. Ordn. des Thier-Reichs (Leipzig and Heidelberg), 1. Bd., 2. Abt.6 [p. 842].Google Scholar
Chatterjee, G. C. (1917). A Trichomastix (n.sp.) parasitic in the human intestine. Indian J. med. Res. 5, 217.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. (1920). Culture indéfinie d'un Trichomonas intestinal du cobaye; essais de purification, action morphogbne des milieux sur la membrane ondulante. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 83, 69.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, B. M. (1935). Some observations on pure line strains of Trichomonas hominis and Trichomonas of the snake, Natrix erythrogaster (a non-poisonous water-snake). J. Trop. Med. (Hyg), 38, 148.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. (1907). Trichomastix serpentis n.sp. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 51, 449.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. (1909). Researches on the intestinal Protozoa of frogs and toads. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 53, 201.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. (1910). On some parasitic Protozoa from Ceylon. Spolia zeylan. 7, 65.Google Scholar
Doflein, F. (1916). Lehrbuch der Protozoenkunde, 4th ed.Jena.Google Scholar
Duboscq, O. & Grassé, P. (1923). Sur les petits flagellés de Calotermes flavicollis (Fab.). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 177, 362.Google Scholar
Duboscq, O. & Grassé, P. (1924). Notes sur les protistes parasites des Termites de France. Sur l'évolution de Janickiella grassii Dub. et Gras. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 90, 1442.Google Scholar
Fonseca, O. O. R. Da (1916). Estudos sobre os flagellados parasitos dos mammiferos do Brazil. Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz. 8, 5.Google Scholar
Fonseca, O. O. R. Da (1917). Sobre os flagellados parasitos (5a nota prévia). Brazil-med. 31, 417.Google Scholar
Fonseca, O. O. R. Da (1928). Eutrichomastix rhinocrici, nouvelle espèce de flagellé parasite d'un myriapode. Soc. brésil. Biol., janvier, in C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 98, 643.Google Scholar
Franchini, G. (1921). Sur les flagellés intestinaux du type Herpetomonas du Chamaeleon vulgaris et leur culture, et sur las flagellés du type Herpetomonas de Chalcides (Gongylus) ocellatus et Tarentola mauritanica. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 14, 641.Google Scholar
Grassi, B. (1881). Intorno ad alcuni protisti endoparassitici, ed appartenenti alle classi dei Flagellati, Lobosi, Sporozoi e Ciliati. Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat. 24, 135.Google Scholar
Haughwout, F. G. & Horilleno, F. S. (1920). The intestinal animal parasites found in one hundred sick Fifipino children. Philipp. J. Sci. 16, 1.Google Scholar
Kofoid, C. A. & Swezy, O. (1915). Mitosis and multiple fission in trichomonad flagellates. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. 51, 289.Google Scholar
Kotlån, A. (1923). Zur Kenntnis der Darmflagellaten aus der Hausente und anderen Wasservögeln. Zbl. Bakt. (I. Abt. Orig.), 90, 24.Google Scholar
Léger, L. (1904). Protozoaires parasites des vipères. Bull. Ass. franç. Sci. 9, 268.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, D. L. (1910). New protist parasites from the intestine of Trichoptera. Parasitology, 3, 245.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, D. L. (1912). Protists parasitic in the larva of the crane-fly, Tipula sp. Preliminary note. Parasitology 5, 175.Google Scholar
Martin, C. H. & Robertson, M. (1911). Further observations on the caccal parasites of fowls, with some reference to the rectal fauna of other vertebrates. Part 1. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 57, 53.Google Scholar
Prowazek, S. von (1904). Untersuchungen über einige parasitische Flagellaten. Arb. Gesundh Amt., Berl., 21, 1.Google Scholar
Reichenow, E. (1918). Eutrichomastix lacertae en la sangre y en ácaros hématófagos. Bol. Inst. nac. Hig., Madr., 14, 183.Google Scholar
Reichenow, E. (1920). Eutrichomastix lacertae im Blut mid in blutsaugenden Milben. Zbl. Bakt. (I. Abt. Orig.), 84, 466.Google Scholar
Vollenhoeven, S. C. S. van (1878). Espéces nouvelles ou peu connues d'hymenoptéres térébrants. Tijdschr. Ent. 21, 153.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. (1926). Protozoology. London.Google Scholar
Yakimoff, W. L., Wassilewsky, W. J., Korniloff, M. T. & Zwiethoff, N. A. (1921). Flagellés de l'intestin des ammaux de laboratoire. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 14, 558.Google Scholar