Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:13:53.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the duration of the acquired immunity of chickens to Eimeria maxima Tyzzer, 1929

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. L. Long
P. L. Long
Affiliation:
Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdonshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Young chickens given an infection of 5000 oocysts of E. maxima were highly resistant when they were given a 2nd dose 3 weeks later. Immunity in these fowls was not apparent when they were again infected 10 weeks after the 2nd infection. The same fowls given a final dose 26 weeks after the 3rd infection became heavily infected. These observations suggest that immunity developed to this infection is short-lived, and this finding is discussed in relation to the duration of acquired immunity to E. tenella infection in the fowl and E. stiedae infection in the rabbit.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 52 , Issue 1-2 , May 1962 , pp. 89 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beach, J. R. & Corl, J. C. (1925). Studies in the control of avian coccidiosis. Poult. Sci. 4, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brackett, S. & Bliznick, A. (1952). The reproductive potential of five species of coccidia of the chicken as demonstrated by oocyst production. J. Parasit. 38, 133–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton-Smith, C. (1947). Coccidiosis—some factors influencing its epidemiology. Vet. Rec. 59, 645–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Horton-Smith, C., Beattie, J. & Long, P. L. (1961). Resistance to Eimeria tenella and its transference from one caecum to the other in individual fowls. Immunology, 4, no. 2, 111–21.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. T. (1927). Immunity or resistance in the chicken to coccidial infection. Bull. Ore. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 230.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. T. (1938). Coccidiosis of the chicken with special reference to species. Bull. Ore. Agric. Exp. Sta. No. 358.Google Scholar
Long, P. L. & Rowell, J. G. (1958). Counting oocysts of chicken coccidia. Lab. Practice, 7, 515–19.Google Scholar
Long, P. L. (1959). A study of Eimeria maxima Tyzzer, 1929, a coccidium of the fowl (Gallus gallus). Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 53, no. 3, 325–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, A. E., Long, P. L. & Horton-Smith, C. (1962). Immunity to Eimeria in the young fowl (Gallus gallus). Immunology 5, No. 1.Google Scholar
Rose, M. E. (1961). The complement fixation test in hepatic coccidiosis in rabbits. Immunology 4. No. 4, 346–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Rose, M. E. & Long, P. L. (1962). Immunity to four species of Eimeria in the fowl. Immunology, 5, No. 1.Google Scholar
Senger, C. M., Hammond, D. M., Thorne, J. L., Johnson, H. E. & Wells, G. M. (1959). Resistance of calves to reinfection with Eimeria bovis. J. Protozool. 6, 51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyzzer, E. E. (1929). Coccidiosis in gallinaceous birds. Amer. J. Hyg. 10, 269–383.Google Scholar