Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:45:14.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on migratory behaviour and development of Baylisascaris tasmaniensis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. F. A. Sprent
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
J. Lamina
Affiliation:
Leiter der Abtlg. Parasitologie and Zoologie der TU München-Freising, 805 Freising/Weihenstephan, West Germany
Ann McKeown
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Extract

The development of larvae of Baylisascaris tasmaniensis to the adult stage is described, using laboratory mice and the Tasmanian devil as experimental hosts. The first moult occurred in the egg, the second moult occurred in mouse tissues at 1–2 weeks after ingestion of embryonated eggs. Larvae migrated to liver, lungs, brain, eyes and kidneys, but most larvae were found in the mesenteric tissues and wall of the intestine. Larvae grew to a length of 0·5–1·0 mm in mice, although some attained a length of 2 mm or more in infections over a year in duration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sprent, J. F. A. (1953). On the life history of Ascaris devosi and its development in the white mouse and the domestic ferret. Parasitology 42, 244–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprent, J. F. A. (1966). Observations relating to the diagnosis of visceral larva migrans. Proceedings, First International Congress of Parasitology, Rome, 09, 1964. 2, 802–3.Google Scholar
Sprent, J. F. A. (1970). Baylisascaris tasmaniensis sp. nov. in marsupial carnivores: heirloom or souvenir? Parasitology 61, 7586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar