Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:57:26.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The morphology of the British Prostriata, with particular reference to Ixodes hexagonus Leach. III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Don R. Arthur
Don R. Arthur
Affiliation:
The Department of Zoology, King's College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The spiracular plate is made up of three layers, (a) the outermost non-porose plate, which varies in thickness, being thicker where the (b) intermediate layer of pedicels fuses towards the outside, and thinner over the goblets. The innermost layer (c) is of even thickness, and corrugated.

2. The ostium is bounded by the columella dorsally and by the lower lip ven-trally, both of which are continuous with the thickened antero-ventrally placed macula.

3. The ostium opens into a subostial space which in turn passes into the atrium. The ventral and ventro-lateral walls are thrown into two folds about midway along, and then anteriorly and posteriorly merge to form a single lobe. The musculature associated with the atrium is described.

4. On morphological grounds it appears that the ostium is incapable of opening and closing, and it is suggested that only opening muscles—the dorsal and ventral atrial muscles—are present.

5. The distribution of the main tracheal trunks is described.

6. Hailer's organ in the female of I. hexagonus consists of a trough and a capsule; the former bears six hairs divisible into types I–IV and the latter contains seven tapering sensillae. This pattern is applicable to both the male and the nymph: in the larva one type III sensilla is missing from the trough and only 4 sensory hairs are present in the capsule.

7. A description of Haller's organ in the British Ixodes species is given, and it is shown to be of systematic value.

8. The status of species possessing ‘trough-nosed’ capsules is discussed, and the validity of giving such species generic rank does not appear to be justified. As far as the material investigated is concerned there seems little difference in the sexes, with the exception of I. muris and I. loricatus, nor has any correlation been established between the structure of the organ and host specificity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 46 , Issue 3-4 , November 1956 , pp. 261 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

André, M. & Colas-Belcour, J. (1942). Sur une nouvelle variété d'Ixodes canisuga (Acarien). Bull. Mus. Hist. nat. Paris, 14, 261–3.Google Scholar
Arthur, D. R. (1951). The capitulum and feeding mechanism of Ixodes hexagonus Leach. Parasitology, 41, 66–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arthur, D. R. (1953 a). The capitulum and feeding mechanism of Ixodes hexagonus Leach. II. Parasitology, 42, 187–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arthur, D. R. (1953 b). The morphology of the British Prostriata with particular reference to Ixodes hexagonus Leach. II. Parasitology, 42, 161–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arthur, D. R. (1953 c). The systematic status of Ixodes percavatus var. rothschildi Nuttall & Warburton 1911. Parasitology, 43, 222–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arthur, D. R. (1955 a). Ixodes kohlsi, a new species of tick from Australia. J. Parasit. 41, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arthur, D. R. (1955 b). New species of ticks (Ixodes) associated with small mammals. Parasitology, 45, 131–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arthur, D. R. (1955 c). Observations on collections of ticks from Denmark. Ent. medd. 27, 76–81.Google Scholar
Baker, E. W. & Wharton, G. W. (1952). An Introduction to Acarology. New York: Macmillan and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Batelli, A. (1891). Note anotomo-fisiologishe sugli Ixodini. Communicazione Preventivo (second part). Monit. zool. ital. 2, 98–104.Google Scholar
Bonnet, A. (1907). Recherches sur l'anatomie comparée et le développement des Ixodidés. Ann. Univ. Lyon. (N. ser. 1), 20, 1–180.Google Scholar
Browning, T. O. (1954). On the structure of the spiracle of the tick Ornithodoros moubata Murray. Parasitology, 44, 310–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooley, R. A. & Kohls, G. M. (1945). The genus Ixodes in North America. Bull. U.S. Publ. Hlth San. no. 184.Google Scholar
Dinnick, J. & Zumpt, F. (1951). Morphology and systematic significance of Hailor's organ in the genus Rhipicephalus Koch. (seen in MSS.).Google Scholar
Douglas, J. R. (1943). The internal anatomy of Dermacentor andersoni Stiles. Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent. 7, 207–72.Google Scholar
Falke, H. (1931). Beiträge zur Lebensgeschichte und zur postembryonalen Entwicklung von Ixodes ricinus L. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 21, 567–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haarløv, N. (1943). The chaetotaxis of tarsus I in some Mesostigmata. Ent. medd. 23, 273–94.Google Scholar
Haller, G. (1881). Vorlänfige Bemerkungen über das Gehörorgan der Ixodiden. Zool. Anz. 4, 165.Google Scholar
Lees, A. D. (1948). The sensory physiology of the sheep tick Ixodes ricinus L. J. Exp. Biol. 25, 145–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, A. D. (1952). The role of cuticle growth in the feeding process of ticks. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 121, 759–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellanby, K. (1935). The structure and function of the spiracles of the tick Ornithodoros moubata Murray Parasitology, 27, 291–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehring, A. (1884). Ueber Halarachne Halichoeri Allmann, sowie ueber einige Halichoerus Schädel. S.B. Ges. naturf. Fr. Berl. 4, 57–67.Google Scholar
Neumann, K. -W. (1942). Besitzen die mesostigmata ein dem Hallerschen der Zecken homologes Tarsalorgan. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 39, 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, K. -W. (1943). Noch einmal: Das Tarsalorgan bei Spinturnix v. Heiden. Zool. Anz. 143, 105–16.Google Scholar
Nordenskiold, E. (1908). Zur anatomie und histologie von Ixodes reduvius. Zool. Jber. (Anat.). 25, 637–74.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. (1911). On the adaptation of ticks to the habits of their hosts. Parasitology, 4, 46–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F., Cooper, W. F. & Robinson, L. E. (1908 a). On the structure of ‘Haller's organ’ in the Ixodoidea. Parasitology, 1, 238–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F., Cooper, W. F. & Robinson, L. E. (1908 b). On the structure of the spiracles of a tick—Haemaphysalis punctata Canestrini & Fanzago. Parasitology, 1, 347–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1925). Halarachne Studien. Arch. Naturgesch. 91 (Jahrg. 7), 48–108.Google Scholar
Robinson, L. E. & Davidson, J. (1913). Anatomy of Argas persicus Oken, II. Parasitology, 6, 217–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samson, K. (1909). Zur anatomie und biologie von Ixodes ricinus L. Z. wiss. Zool. 93, 185–236.Google Scholar
Schulze, P. (1923). Ixodina. In Biologie der Tiere Deutschlands, pp. 21.2–21.28. Berlin. Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger.Google Scholar
Schulze, P. (1938). Über die ‘bipolare’ Zecke Ceratixodes uriae (White), putus (Pick.-Cambr.). Zool. Anz. 123, 12–15.Google Scholar
Schulze, P. (1941). Das Geruchsorgan der Zecken. Untersuchungen über die Abwandlungen eines Sinnesorganes und seine stammesgeschichtliche Bedeutung. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 37, 491–564.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. (1952). A Text Book of Arthropod Anatomy, 363 pp. Cornell: Comstock.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. (1910). The taxonomic value of the microscopical structure of the stigmal plates in the tick genus Dermacentor. Bull. U.S. Hyg. Lab. no. 62, 1–67.Google Scholar
Warburton, C. (1926). On three new species of ticks (Arachnida, Ixodoidea). Ornithodoros gurneyi, Ixodes arvicolae and Haemaphysalis mjobergi. Parasitology, 18, 55–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1950). A new method for injecting the tracheae and tracheoles of insects. Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 91, 217–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Zumpt, F. (1952). The ticks of sea birds. Aust. Nat. Antarc. Res. Exp. (Series B), 1, 12–20.Google Scholar