Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T05:08:14.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mode of action of cyclosporin A against Hymenolepis microstoma (Cestoda): relationship between cyclophilin binding and drug-induced damage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2001

P.E. McLAUCHLAN
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, Scotland
H.C. ROBERTS
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, Scotland Present address: The Galton Laboratory, Department of Biology, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE.
L.H. CHAPPELL
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, Scotland

Abstract

Cyclosporin A (CsA) is a widely investigated experimental anti-parasitic drug whose mode of action remains unresolved. The immunosuppressive action of CsA depends on the drug binding to the intracellular receptor cyclophilin (CyP). This study investigates whether complexing of CsA with parasite CyP is equally essential for its anthelmintic action. The correlation between initial cyclosporin-induced damage in vitro and drug binding to parasite CyP has been examined. CsA and the analogues B-5-49, CsH and CsA-acetate all induced similar damage to the tapeworm Hymenolepis microstoma in vitro in incubations between 2h and 4 days. The initial foci of drug damage were the parasite surface and mitochondria in the syncytium. In a competitive binding assay only B-5-49 displaced [H3]-CsA from either crude parasite cytosolic CyP or affinity-purified CyP while CsH and CsA-acetate had no effect. These data suggest strongly that cyclosporins act on the surfaces of helminth parasites but that drug action does not involve complex formation with CyP. An alternative drug-binding site must therefore be identified which may lead to the rational design of novel anthelmintic drugs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)