Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:36:24.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interference with Fasciola hepatica snail finding by various aquatic organisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Niels Ørnbjerg Christensen
Affiliation:
Danish Bilharziasis Laboratory, Jœgersborg Allé 1 D, DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark
Peter Nansen
Affiliation:
The Danish Agricultural and Verterinary Research Council, Parasitological Research Group, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, DK-1870 Copenhagen V, Denmark
Flemming Frandsen
Affiliation:
Danish Bilharziasis Laboratory, Jœgersborg Allé 1 D, DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark

Extract

Previous studies using radioactive miracidia have shown that a number of non-host snails and bivalves, interposed as ‘decoys’ in linear test channels, may interfere with the capacity of Fasciola hepatica miracidia to infect Lymnaea truncatula. Applying similar experimental principles, the role of several other potential interferents have been analysed in the present study. Daphnia pulex (Cladocera) and larvae of Corethra sp. (Diptera) exercised significant interfering effects by protecting ‘target’ snails from infection. Evidence suggested that this effect was a result of their normal predatory behaviour. Other organisms including Herpobdella testacea and Helobdella stagnalis (Hirudinea), Acellus aquaticus (Isopoda), Planaria lugubris (Turbellaria) and L. Truncatula egg clusters failed to interfere with miracidial host-finding. Nor did P. lugubris and L. truncatula ‘conditioned water’ interfere with the capacity of the miracidia to infect their host snail.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chernin, E. (1974). Some host-finding attributes of Schistosoma mansoni. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 23, 320–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernin, E. & Perlstein, J. M. (1969). Further studies on interference with the host-finding capacity of Schistosoma mansoni miracidia. Journal of Parasitology 55, 500–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernin, E. & Perlstein, J. M. (1971). Protection of snails aganist miracidia of Schistosoma mansoni by various aquatic invertebrates. Journal of Parasitology 57, 217–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, N., Ø., Nansen P. & Frandsen, F. (1976 a). Molluscs interfering with the capacity of Fasciola hepatica miracidia to infect Lymnaea truncatula. Parasitology 73, 161–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, N., Ø., Nansen P. & Frandsen, F. (1976 b). The influence of temperature on the infectivity of Fasciola hepatica miracidia to Lymnaea truncatula. Journal of Parasitology 62, 698701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaudel, R. J. & Etges, F. J. (1973). Toxic effects of freshwater turbellarians on schistosome miracidia. Journal of Parasitology 59, 74–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nansen, P., Chrietensen, N., Ø, & Frandsen F. (1976 a). A technique for in vivo labelling of Fasciola hepatica miracidia with radioselenium. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 49, 7380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nansen, P., Frandsen, F. & Christensen, N. Ø. (1976 b). A study on snail location by Fasciola hepatica using radioisotopically labelled miracidia. Parasitology 72, 163–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar