Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:16:06.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of water temperature and pH on the survival of Fasciola hepatica miracidia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

G. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College, London SW7 2BB
B. T. Grenfell
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College, London SW7 2BB

Summary

Experimental studies on the survival of Fasciola hepatica miracidia show no evidence that miracidial mortality varies with the pH of the medium, at least in the range 6·0–8·0. On the other hand, miracidial mortality is shown to vary with both the temperature of the medium and the age of the larvae. The mean expected life-span of the miracidium decreases from about 35 h at 6°C to about 6° h at 25° C. The Gompertz survival function provides a good description of the miracidial survivorship curves over the range of temperatures used, and we describe, a maximum likelihood method of estimating the mean values of the parameters of this function, together with their approximate 95% confidence limits.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. M., Mercer, J. G., Wilson, R. A. & Carter, N. P. (1982). Transmission of Schistosoma mansoni from man to snail: experimental studies of miracidial survival and infectivity in relation to larval age, water temperature, host size and host age. Parasitiology 85, 339–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. M. & Whitfield, P. J. (1975). Survival characteristics of the free-living cercarial population of the ectoparasitic digenean Transversotrema patialensis (Soparker, 1924). Parasitology 70, 295310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard, Y. (1974). Non-linear Parameter Estimation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chick, B. F., Coverdale, O. R. & Jackson, A. R. B. (1980). Production effects of liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) infection in beef cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal 56, 588–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garg, M. L., Raja Rao, B. & Redmond, C. K. (1970). Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the Gompertz survival function. Applied Statistics 19, 152–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope Cawdery, M. J., Gettinby, C. & Grainger, J. N. R. (1978). Mathematical models for predicting the prevalence of liver fluke disease and its control from biological and meteorological data. In Weather and Parasitic Animal Disease, World Meteorological Organization Technical Note no. 159, pp 2138.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. & Stuart, A. (1973). The Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. 11, 3rd Ed. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Over, H. J. & Dijkstra, J. (1975). Infection rhythm in fascioliasis. In Facts and Reflections II. (Lelystad Workshop on Fascioliasis), (ed. Over, H. J. and Armour, J.).Google Scholar
Pantelouris, E. M. (1965). The Common Liver Fluke Fasciola hepatica L. Oxford; Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (1978). A field and laboratory study of the epidemiology of fascioliasis. D. Phil. thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (1982). An analysis of variations in the age structure of Fasciola hepatica populations in sheep. Parasitology 84, 4961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, von. B. (1965). Untersuchungen über ektogene Helminthenstadion. Angewandte Parasitologie 6, 142–50.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. & Denison, J. (1970). Studies on the activity of the miracidium of the common liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 32, 301–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed