Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:15:48.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic characterization of parthenogenic Fasciola sp. in Japan on the basis of the sequences of ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2005

T. ITAGAKI ,
M. KIKAWA ,
K. SAKAGUCHI ,
J. SHIMO ,
K. TERASAKI ,
T. SHIBAHARA  and
K. FUKUDA
T. ITAGAKI
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, Ueda 3-18-8, Morioka 020-8550, Japan
M. KIKAWA
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, Ueda 3-18-8, Morioka 020-8550, Japan
K. SAKAGUCHI
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, Ueda 3-18-8, Morioka 020-8550, Japan
J. SHIMO
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, Ueda 3-18-8, Morioka 020-8550, Japan
K. TERASAKI
Affiliation:
St Mary's Junior College, Kurume 830-8558, Japan
T. SHIBAHARA
Affiliation:
Division of Laboratory Animal Science, Research Center for Bioscience and Technology, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8503, Japan
K. FUKUDA
Affiliation:
Center for Laboratory Animal Science, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa 359-8513, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Accurate identification of aspermic Fasciola forms in Japan remains difficult because of their morphological variations. In order to characterize the forms genetically, nucleotide sequences of ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS1 and ITS2) and mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) and NADH dehydrogenase I (NDI) genes in 34 liver flukes from 16 prefectures in Japan were analysed. Two major forms represented by Fsp 1 and Fsp 2 had sequences identical to or closely resembling those of F. hepatica and F. gigantica, respectively, in all the 4 DNA markers and were mainly distributed in northern and eastern-western parts of Japan, respectively. Fsp 1 and Fsp 2 would have been introduced into Japan with infected cattle of 2 distinct lineages via the Korean Peninsula and spread through limited parts of Japan (northern and eastern-western parts) together with the movement of each cattle lineage. The Japanese form (Fsp 1/2), which showed heterozygosity in ribosomal DNA and Fsp 2 haplotype in mitochondrial DNA, may have originated in interspecific cross hybridization between paternal F. hepatica and maternal F. gigantica.

Keywords

Fasciola spJapanparthenogenesishaplotypeITS1ITS2COINDIgenetic characterization
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 131 , Issue 5 , November 2005 , pp. 679 - 685
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adlard, R. D., Barker, S. C., Blair, D. and Cribb, T. H. ( 1993). Comparison of the second internal transcribed spacer (ribosomal DNA) from populations and species of Fasciolidae (Digenea). International Journal for Parasitology 23, 423–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agatsuma, T., Terasaki, K., Yang, L. and Blair, D. ( 1994). Genetic variation in the triploids of Japanese Fasciola species, and relationships with other species in the genus. Journal of Helminthology 68, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agatsuma, T., Arakawa, Y., Iwagami, M., Honzako, Y., Cahyaningsih, U., Kang, S-Y. and Hong, S-J. ( 2000). Molecular evidence of natural hybridization between Fasciola hepatica and F. gigantica. Parasitology International 49, 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akahane, H., Harada, Y. and Oshima, T. ( 1970). Patterns of variation of the common liver fluke (Fasciola sp.) in Japan. III. Comparative studies on the external form, size of egg and number of eggs in the uterus of fluke in cattle, goat and rabbit. Japanese Journal of Parasitology 19, 619–627 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
Avise, J. C., Quattro, J. M. and Vrijenhoek, R. C. ( 1992). Molecular clones within organismal clones: mitochondrial DNA phylogenies and the evolutionary histories of unisexual vertebrates. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26, 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, D. and McManus, D. P. ( 1989). Restriction enzyme mapping of ribosomal DNA can distinguish between fasciolid (liver fluke) species. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 36, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawley, R. M. ( 1989). An introduction to unisexual vertebrates. In Evolution and Ecology of Unisexual Vertebrates ( ed. Dawley, R. M. and Bogart, J. P.), pp. 1–18. New York State Museum, Albany, New York.
Hashimoto, K., Watanobe, T., Liu, C. X., Init, I., Blair, D., Ohnishi, T. and Agatsuma, T. ( 1997). Mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA indicate that the Japanese Fasciola species is F. gigantica. Parasitology Research 83, 220–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itagaki, H. and Akane, S. ( 1959). Morphological study on the Japanese liver fluke, compared with the African specimens. The Bulletin of Azabu Veterinary College 6, 115–123.Google Scholar
Itagaki, T. and Tsutsumi, K. ( 1998). Triploid form of Fasciola in Japan: genetic relationships between Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica determined by ITS-2 sequence of nuclear rDNA. International Journal for Parasitology 28, 777–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itagaki, T., Tsutsumi, K., Ito, K. and Tsutsumi, Y. ( 1998). Taxonomic status of the Japanese triploid forms of Fasciola: comparison of mitochondrial ND1 and COI sequences with F. hepatica and F. gigantica. Journal of Parasitology 84, 445–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, S. B. ( 1965). Relationships between the species of Fasciola and their molluscan hosts. Advances in Parasitology 3, 59–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannen, H., Kohno, M., Nagata, Y., Tsuji, S., Bradley, D. G., Yeo, J. S., Nyamsamba, D., Zagdsuren, Y., Yokohama, M., Nomura, K. and Amano, T. ( 2004). Independent mitochondrial origin and historical genetic differentiation in North Eastern Asian cattle. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32, 539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, D. P. and Bowles, J. ( 1996). Molecular genetic approaches to parasite identification: their value in diagnostic parasitology and systematics. International Journal for Parasitology 26, 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriyama, N., Tsuji, M. and Seto, T. ( 1979). Three karyotypes and their phenotypes of Japanese liver flukes (Fasciola sp.). Japanese Journal of Parasitology 28, 23–33 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
Mukai, F., Tsuji, S., Fukazawa, K., Ohtagaki, S. and Nambu, Y. ( 1989). History and population structure of a closed strain of Japanese Black cattle. Journal of Animal. Breeding and Genetics 106, 254–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshima, T., Akahane, H. and Shimazu, T. ( 1968). Patterns of the variation of the common liver fluke (Fasciola sp.) in Japan. I. Variations in the sizes and shapes of the worms and eggs. Japanese Journal of Parasitology 17, 97–105 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
Reddy, P. V. and Subramanyam, S. ( 1973). Chromosome studies in the liver fluke, Fasciola gigantica Cobbold, 1856, from Andra Pradesh. Current Science 42, 288–291.Google Scholar
Sakaguchi, Y. ( 1980). Karyotype and gametogenesis of the common liver fluke, Fasciola sp., in Japan. Japanese Journal of Parasitology 29, 507–513.Google Scholar
Sanderson, A. R. ( 1953). Maturation and probable gynogenesis in the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica L. Nature, London 172, 110–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, R. ( 1963). Alcoholic hydrochloric acid-carmine as a stain for chromosomes in squash preparations. Stain Technology 38, 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D. L. ( 2001). PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other methods ver. 4.0beta. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachussetts.
Terasaki, K., Akahane, H. and Habe, S. ( 1982). The geographical distribution of common liver flukes (the Genus Fasciola) with normal and abnormal spermatogenesis. Japanese Journal of Parasitology 44, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terasaki, K., Noda, Y., Shibahara, T. and Itagaki, T. ( 2000). Morphological comparisons and hypotheses on the origin of polyploids in parthenogenetic Fasciola sp. Journal of Parasitology 86, 724–729.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. and Higgins, D. G. ( 1997). The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acid Research 24, 4876–4882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgerson, P. and Claxton, J. ( 1999). Epidemiology and control. In Fasciolosis ( ed. Dalton, J. P.), pp. 113–149. CABI Publishing, UK.
Vrijenhoek, R. C. ( 1994). Unisexuala fish: model systems for studying ecology and evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25, 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, S. and Iwata, S. ( 1954). Fasciola species in Japan. Journal of Japan Veterinary Medical Association 7, 124–126 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Wilson, C. C. and Hebert, P. D. N. ( 1992). The maintenance of taxon diversity in an asexual assemblage: an experimental analysis. Ecology 73, 1462–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar