Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:11:48.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genera and species of parasitic mites (Acarina)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Charles D. Radford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During my work on the mites I have often wished that a book were available in which all the known and valid genera and species of parasitic mites could be found. The literature on the Acarina contains numerous genera and species which are synonyms of older identifications.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 35 , Issue 1-2 , February 1943 , pp. 58 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

*Allman, G. J. (1847). Description of a new genus and species of Tracheary Arachnidans. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 20, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Banks, N. (1899). A new species of the genus Halarachne. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 4, 212–14.Google Scholar
Banks, N. (1901). A new genus of endoparasitic Acarians. Geneesk. Tijdschr. Nederl. Indie, 41, 330–4.Google Scholar
Banks, N. (1904). A treatise on the Acarina, or mites. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 28, 53, 54, 61 and 71–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, N. (1905). Descriptions of some new mites. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 7, 133–42.Google Scholar
*Banks, N. (1909). New Canadian mites. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 11, 133–43.Google Scholar
*Banks, N. (1910). New American mites. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 12, 2–12.Google Scholar
*Berlese, A. (1882–1892). Acari Myriopoda et Scorpiones hucusque in Italia reperta. Patavii, Florentiae.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Berlese, A. (1888). Acari Austro-Americani. Bull. Soc. ent. Ital. 20, 171–224.Google Scholar
*Berlese, A. (1903 a). Acari nuovi, Manipulus 1. Redia, 1, 260.Google Scholar
*Berlese, A. (1903 b). Diagnosi di alcune nuove specie di Acari italiani mirmecofili e liberi. Zool. Anz. 27, 14.Google Scholar
*Berlese, A. (1906). Monographia del genere Gamasus Latr. Redia, 3, 66–304.Google Scholar
*Berlese, A. (1910). Acari nouvi. Redia, 6, 199–234.Google Scholar
*Berlese, A. (1911). Acarorum species novae quindecim. Redia, 7, 429–35.Google Scholar
*Berlese, A. (1918). Centuria quarta di Acari nuovi. Redia, 13, 115–90.Google Scholar
*Berlese, A. (1921). Centuria quinta di Acari nouvi. Redia, 14, 152.Google Scholar
Berthold, A. A. (1845). Lehrb. Zool. Gottingen, 349–53.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. (1832). Handb. Ent. 1, 331–4.Google Scholar
Canestrini, G. & Fanzago, F. (1877). Intorno agli Acari italiani. Atti. R. Inst. Venet. Sci. Lett. Arti, 4 (5), 69–208.Google Scholar
Canestrini, G. & R (1882). I. Gamasi Italiani, Monografia. Atti. Soc. Veneto-Trentina.Google Scholar
Canestrini, G. (1885). Prospetto dell' Acarofauna italiana. Atti. Soc. Veneto-Trentina.Google Scholar
*Canestrini, G. (1895). Ueber einen neuen parasiten der Säugethiere. Zool. Anz. 18, 114–15.Google Scholar
*Chandler, W. L. & Ruhe, D. S. (1940). Pneumonyssus caninum n.sp., a mite from the frontal sinus of the dog. J. Parasit. 26, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claparede, E. (1868). Studien an Acariden. Z. wiss. Zool. 18, 445–546.Google Scholar
Duges, A. (1834). Nouvelles observations sur les Acariens. Ann. Sci. nat. (Zool.), 11, 104–6.Google Scholar
†Ewing, H. E. (1922). Dermanyssid mites of N. America. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 62, 13, 1–26.Google Scholar
*Ewing, H. E. (1924 a). A new mite from the lung of a rattlesnake. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 26, 179.Google Scholar
*Ewing, H. E. (1924 b). Ectoparasites of some Polynesian and Malaysian rats of the genus Rattus. Bull. Bern. P. Bish. Mus. Honolulu, 14, 7–11.Google Scholar
*Ewing, H. E. (1925 a). New mites of the family Dermanyssidae. Ent. News, 36, 18–22.Google Scholar
*Ewing, H. E. (1925 b). New mites of t h e parasitic genus Haemogamasus Berlese. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 38, 138–43.Google Scholar
*Ewing, H. E. (1925 c). New parasitic mites of the genus Laelaps. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 27, 1, 1–7.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1929 a). A Manual of External Parasites. Baltimore: Chas. Thomas.Google Scholar
*Ewing, H. E. (1929 b). Notes on the lung mites of Primates (Acarina, Dermanyssidae) including the description of a new species. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 31, 126–30.Google Scholar
†Ewing, H. E. (1933). New genera and species of parasitic mites of the superfamily Parasitoidea. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 82, 30, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Ewing, H. E. (1936). A short synopsis of the North American species of the mite genus Dermanyssus. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 38, 47–54.Google Scholar
Ferris, G. F. (1925). On two species of the genus Halarachne (Acarina: Gamasidae). Parasitology, 17, 163–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Fonseca, Flavio Da (1932). Notas de Acareologia. Mem. Inst. Butantan, 7, 135–46.Google Scholar
†Fonseca, Flavio Da (1934). Der Schlangenparasit Ixobioides butantanensis n.gen., n.sp. Z. Parasitenk, 6, 4, 508–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Fonseca, Flavio Da (1935 a). New Genera and Species of Acari ‘Laelaptidae’ from Brazilian Rodents. XII Congr. Int. Zool. Lisbon, 1597–1615.Google Scholar
†Fonseca, Flavio Da (1935 b). Notas de Acareologia. Mem. Inst. Butantan, 9, 33–8, 43–72, 89–97.Google Scholar
†Fonseca, Flavio Da (1936). Notas de Acareologia. Mem. Inst. Butantan, 10, 43–6, 51–9.Google Scholar
†Fonseca, Flavio Da (1938). Notas de Acareologia. Mem. Inst. Butantan, 12, 7–53, 103–23, 147–54.Google Scholar
Geer, C. De (1778). Memoires pour servir à l'histoire des Insectes. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Gervais, P. (1844). Hist. Nat. Ins. Apt, 3, 223.Google Scholar
Giebel, C. (1871). Ueber einige milben. Z. für die gesamten naturwissenschaften, 38, 31–2.Google Scholar
Haller, G. (1880). Zur Kenntnis der Tyroglyphiden und Verwandten. Z. wiss. Zool. 34, 255–95.Google Scholar
Haller, G. (1882). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Milbenfauna Wurttembergs. Jber. Ver. Nat. Wurtt. 312.Google Scholar
Haller, G. (1884). Beschreibung einiger neuen Milben. Arch. Naturgesch. 1, 217–36.Google Scholar
Hermann, J. F. (1804). Memoire apterologique. Strasburg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyden, C. H. G. Von (1826). Versuch einer system atischen Eintheilung der Acariden. Oken, Isis, 19, 608–13.Google Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1912). On two new parasitic Acari of the genus Leiognathus On. Bull. Ent. Res. 3, 369–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1913). On three new species of Gamasid mites found on rats. Bull. Ent. Res. 4, 119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1914 a). Preliminary list of the Aeari occurring on the brown rat in Great Britain. Bull. Ent. Res. 5, 119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1914 b). On the parasitic acari found on the species of rodents frequenting human habitations in Egypt. Bull. Ent. Res. 5, 215–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1914 c). Report on the Arachnida and Myriopoda collected by the British Ornithologists Union Expedition and the Wollaston Expedition in Dutch New Guinea. Trans. Zool. Soc. Land. 20, 10, 325–34.Google Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1915 a). On a blood-sucking Gamasid mite (Ichoronyssus serpentium sp.n.?) parasitic on Couper's snake. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 383–6.Google Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1915 b). On some new acarine parasites of rats. Bull. Ent. Res. 6, 183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1916). Notes on parasitic Acari. Descriptions of two new African mites of the family Gamasidae. J. Zool. Res. 1, 76–81.Google Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1917 a). On some new mites of the suborder Prostigmata living on lizards. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), 19, 136–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Hirst, S. (1917 b). Species of Arachnida and Myriopoda injurious to Man. British Museum (Nat. Hist.) Economic Series, No. 6.Google Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1919). On two new parasitic mites (Myocoptes hintoni and Psoroptes natalensis). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9), 3, 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1921). On some new parasitic mites. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 769–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1923 a). On three new species of Laelaps occurring on S. African rodents. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9), 12, 690–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1923 b). On some new or little known species of Acari. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 971–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1925 a). Descriptions of new Acari, mainly parasitic on Rodents. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1925 b). Acarina (excl. Ixodidae) in ‘Parasitologia Mauritanica.’ Bull. Com. étud. Hist. Sci., A.O.F., Goree, Senegal, 8, 95–100.Google Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1926 a). Description of new mites including four new species of Red Spider. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 825–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. (1926 b). On the parasitic mites of the suborder Prostigmata (Trombidioidea) found on lizards. J. Linn. Soc. Zool. 36, 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1927). Note on Aeari, mainly belonging to the genus Spinturnix von Heyden. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hirst, S. (1931). On some new Australian Aeari (Trombidudae, Anystidae and Gamasidae). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 561–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, W. E. (1938). Ophiopneumicola colubri n.gen., n.sp., a lung mite from a snake. Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 57, 400–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, W. E. (1939). Entonyssus ewingi n.sp., an Ophidian lung mite. Amer. Midi. Nat. 21, 657–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, C. L. (1835–1844). Crustaceen, Myriopoden und Arachniden Deutschlands.Google Scholar
Koch, C. L. (1842). Uebersicht des Arachnidénsystems, 3, 88.Google Scholar
Kolenati, F. A. (1856). Parasiten der Chiropteren.Google Scholar
*Kolenati, F. A. (1858). Synopsis prodroma der auf Chiroptern als Epizooën vorkommenden Lausmilben, Carida, Kolenati. Wien. ent. Mschr. 1 (2), 4–7.Google Scholar
*Kolenati, F. A. (1859). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Arachniden. S.B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 35, 155–90.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. (1796). Précis des caracteres généiques des Insectes etc., Brive.Google Scholar
†Lawrence, R. F. (1935). The prostigmatic mites of South African lizards. Parasitology, 27, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Lawrence, R. F. (1936). The prostigmatic mites of South African lizards. Parasitology, 28, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Lawrence, R. F. (1938). A new Acarine parasite of bats. Parasitology, 30, 309–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Lawrence, R. F. (1939). A new mite from the South African Pangolin. Parasitology, 31, 451–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leidy, J. (1872). On a mite in the ear of the ox. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad. pp. 9–10 and 138.Google Scholar
Ljungh, S. I. (1799). Nov. Act. Reg. Sci. Upsala, 6, 5–10.Google Scholar
Megnin, P. (1876). Mémoire sur l'organization et la distribution zoologique des Acariens de la Famille des Gamasidés. J. Anat. Physiol. 12, 228–336.Google Scholar
Megnin, P. (1878). Note sur un nouvel acarien parasite (Geckobia latasti). Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 5, 8.Google Scholar
Megnin, P. (1879). Les Acariens parasites du tissu cellulaire et des reservoirs aeriens chez les oiseaux. J. Anat. Physiol. 15, 123–53.Google Scholar
†Megnin, P. (1880). Les Parasites et les Maladies Parasitaires. Paris, 478 pp., 26 pls. and 63 text-figs.Google Scholar
*Megnin, P. (1884). Étude sur l'Ophionyssus natricis P. Gervais. Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 9, 107–13.Google Scholar
Michael, A. D. (1844). On an undescribed Acarus of the genus Myobia. J. Quekett Micr. Cl. (2), 2, 1–7.Google Scholar
Michael, A. D. (1889). On some unrecorded Parasitic Acari found in Great Britain. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 20, 400–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, A. D. (1892). On the variations in the internal anatomy of the Gamasinae. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 5, 9, 281–524.Google Scholar
†Newstead, R. & Todd, J. D. (1906). On a new Dermanyssid Acarid. Mem. Lpool Sch. Trop. Med. 18, 41–4.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. (1901). Tijdschr. Ned. Dierk. Vereen (2), 7, 50–87.Google Scholar
*Oudemans, A. C. (1912). Acarologische Aanteekeningen, 29. Ent. Ber. 3, 215–17.Google Scholar
*Oudemans, A. C. (1914). Acarologische Aanteekeningen, 52. Ent. Ber. 4, 65–73.Google Scholar
*Oudemans, A. C. (1916). Acarologische Aanteekeningen, 60. Ent. Ber. 4, 308–16.Google Scholar
*Oudemans, A. C. (1925). Acarologische Aanteekeningen, 79. Ent. Ber. 6, 26–34.Google Scholar
*Oudemans, A. C. (1928). Acarologische Aanteekeningen, 94. Ent. Ber. 7, 374–82.Google Scholar
*Oudemans, A. C. (1929). Acarologische Aanteekeningen, 99. Ent. Ber. 8, 11–20.Google Scholar
†Oudemans, A. C. (1935). Kritsche Literaturübersicht zur Gattung Pneumonyssus. Beschreibung dreier Arten darunter einer neuen. Z. Parasitenk. 7, 4, 466–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Oudemans, A. C. (1939). Neue Funde auf dem Gebiete der Systematik und der nomenclatur der Acari. Zool. Anz. 126, 303–9.Google Scholar
Pagenstecher, H. A. (1861). Listrophorus leuckarti, ein neues Milbengeschlecht. Siebold und Kolliker Z. 11, 109–19.Google Scholar
Pagenstecher, H. A. (1861). Listrophorus gibbus, nebst nachtraglichen Bemerkungen über Listrophorus leuckarti. Siebold und Kolliker Z. 11, 151–61.Google Scholar
*Pearse, A. S. (1929). Two new mites from the gills of land crabs. Pap. Tortugas Lab. 26, 225–30.Google Scholar
*Pearse, A. S. (1930). Parasites of Cructacea. Ann. Zool. Japan, 13, 1–8.Google Scholar
*Perkins, M. (1925). On Acanthophthirius etheldredae, a new genus and species of Anoplura from the Pipistrelle bat. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9), 16, 175–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, W. (1849). S.B. Ges. Naturf. Fr., Berl.Google Scholar
Poppe, S. A. (1887). Über parasitische Milben. Abh. Nat. Ver. Bremen, 10, 1, 205.Google Scholar
†poppe, S. A. (1896). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Gattung Myobia v. Heyden. Zool. Anz. 19, 508–9, 327–33 and 337–49.Google Scholar
†Radford, C. D. (1934). Notes on mites of the genus Myobia, Part 1. North-West. Nat. 9, 356–64.Google Scholar
†Radford, C. D. (1935). Notes on mites of the genus Myobia, Part 2. North-West Nat. 10, 248–58.Google Scholar
†Radford, C. D. (1936 a). Notes. on mites of the genus Myobia, Part 3. North-West Nat. 11, 34–9.Google Scholar
†Radford, C. D. (1936 b). Notes on mites of the genus Myobia, Part 4. North-West Nat. 11, 144–51.Google Scholar
†Radford, C. D. (1937). A new species of mite of the genus Entonyssus Ewing. North-West Nat. 12, 38–42.Google Scholar
†Radford, C. D. (1938 a). Pneumonyssus procavians n.sp. a new lung mite. Ann. Transv. Mus. 19 (2), 147–52.Google Scholar
†Radford, C. D. (1938 b). Notes on some new species of parasitic mites. Parasitology, 30, 427–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Radford, C. D. (1939). Notes on some new species of parasitic mites, Part 2. Parasitology, 31, 241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Radford, C. D. (1940). Notes on some new species of parasitic mites, Part 3. Parasitology, 32, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Radford, C. D. (1941). Notes on some new species of parasitic mites, Part 4. Parasitology, 33, 306–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Radford, C. D. (1942 a). New ectoparasitic mites (Acarina) from Uganda. Parasitology, 34, 185–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Radford, C. D. (1942 b). New parasitic mites (Acarina). Parasitology, 34, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railliet, A. (1893). Traité de Zoologie Médicale et Agricole, 2nd ed., p. 660.Google Scholar
Redi, F. (1674). Esperionze intorno alia Generazione degl'Insetti etc. Firenze.Google Scholar
Sambon, L. W. (1928). Ophioptes parkeri. A new species and genus of Cheyietid inhabiting the scales of reptiles. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 22, 1, 137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Schrank, F. P. Von (1781). Pediculus Muris musculi. Enumeratio Insect. Aust. indig. pp. 501–2.Google Scholar
*Schmidt, F. L. (1940). Entonyssus vitzthumi (Acarina) a new Ophidian lung mite. J. Parasit. 26, 309–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiraboschi, C. (1904). Les Rats, les Souris, et leurs parasites cutanés, dans leurs rapportes avec le propagation de la peste bubonique. Arch. Parasit., Paris, 8, 337–8.Google Scholar
Tragardh, I. (1904). Monographie der arktischen Acariden. Fauna Artica, p. 41. Jena.Google Scholar
*Tragardh, I. (1905). Acariden aus Agypten und der Sudan. Swed. Zool. Exp. Egypt and White Nile, 2, 1–124.Google Scholar
Tragardh, I. (1908). Kilimandjaro-Meru Expedition, Uppsala, 20, 3, 54–7.Google Scholar
Tragardh, I. (1931). Acarina from the Juan Fernandez Islands. Nat. Hist. Juan Fernandez and Easter Islands, Uppsala, 3, 553–628.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1889). Diagnoses d'Acariens nouveaux ou peu connus. Bull. Bibl. Sci. Ouest, 2, 9, 121–43.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1894). Note sur les Acariens parasites des fosses nasales des oiseaux. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, (10), 1, 723–31.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1895 a). Note sur un Acarien parasite des fosses nasales de l'Oie domestique. Rev. Sci. Nat. app. Bull. Soc. Nat. d'Acclimatation, 42, 392–4.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1895 b). Sur les metamorphoses du genre Myobia et diagnoses d'espèces nouvelles d'Acariens. Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 8, 84.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1902). Existence de la Parthénogenèse chez le ‘Gamasus auris Leidy’ de l'oreille du Boeuf domestique. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 54, 1335–7.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (1904). Leiognathus blanchardi sp.n. Acarien parasite de la Marmotte des Alpes. Arch. Parasit., Paris, 8, 558–61.Google Scholar
Tyrbell, J. B. (1883). On the occurrence in Canada of two species of parasitic mites. Proc. Canad. Inst. Toronto, 1, 332–43.Google Scholar
Ullrich, H. (1939). Über einiger neue Schmarotzermilben bei Elch, Biber und Schneehase. Z. Parasitenk. 10, 553–8:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Vitzthum, H. Graf (1914). Beschreibung einiger neuen Milben. Zool. Am. 44, 322–3.Google Scholar
*Vitzthum, H. Graf (1918). Acarologische Beobachtungen, 2 Reihe. Arch. Naturgesch. 84, A. 6, 1–40.Google Scholar
*Vitzthum, H. Graf (1920). Acarologische Beobachtungen, 4 Reihe. Arch. Naturgesch. 86, 1–69.Google Scholar
*Vitzthum, H. Graf (1925). Die Unterirdische Acarofauna. Jena Z. Naturw. 62, 125–86.Google Scholar
*Vitzthum, H. Graf (1926). Malayische Acari. Treubia, 8, 1, 1–198.Google Scholar
*Vitzthum, H. Graf (1928 a). Acarologische Beobachtungen, 12 Reihe. Zool. Anz. 75, 181–98.Google Scholar
*Vitzthum, H. Graf (1928 b). Acarologische Beobachtungen, 13 Reihe. Zool. Anz. 75, 281–95.Google Scholar
*Vitzthum, H. Graf (1930 a). Milben als Pesttrager. Zool. Jb. 60, 381–428.Google Scholar
†Vitzthum, H. Graf (1930 b). Pneumonyssus stammeri, ein neuer Lungenparasit. Z. Parasitenk. 2, 595–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1931 a). Neu parasitische Fledermausmilben aus Venezuela. Z. Parasitenk. 4, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1931 b). Kukenthals Handbuch der Zoologie, 3, 2.Google Scholar
†Vitzthum, H. Graf (1935). Über die Gattung Entonyssus Ewing (Acari). Z. Parasitenk. 7, 709–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vizioli, F. (1868). Osservazioni microscopiche sopra alcuni noduli sottocutanei de' polli e descrizione di un nuovo genere di Acaridei parasita degli uccelli (Sarcoptes cisticola n.g. et n.sp.). Napoli Ace. Aspir. Ann. 1, 60–70.Google Scholar
Vizioli, F. (1870). Osservazioni microscopiche sopra alcuni noduli sottocutanei de' polli e descrizione di un nuovo genere di Acaridei parasita degli uccelli (Sarcoptes cisticola n.g. et n.sp.). Giorn. anat. Fisiol. 1, 257–72.Google Scholar
Walkenaer, C. A. (1847). Histoire Naturella des Insectes, Aptères, 4, 346–54. Paris.Google Scholar
*Weidman, F. D. (1916). Cytokichus penrosei, a new arachnoid parasite found in the diseased lungs of a prairie dog, Cynomys ludovicianus. J. Parasit. 3, 82–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, C. & Wherry, W. B. (1910). Some new internal parasites of the California ground squirrel. Parasitology, 3, 417–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, G. W. (1938). Acarina of Yucatan Caves. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 491, 137–52.Google Scholar
†Willman, C. (1936). Steatonyssus spinosus, eine neue Milbe von Solenodon paradoxus Brdt. Zool. Anz. 114, 5–6, 152–7.Google Scholar
†Womersley, H. (1937). Studies in Australian Acarina, Laelaptidae. Parasitology, 29, 530–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Womersley, H. (1939). Further notes on the Australian Trombidiidae, with descriptions of new species. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aust. 63, 149–66.Google Scholar
†Womersley, H. (1941 a). Notes on the Cheyletidae (Acarina, Trombidoidea) of Australia and New Zealand, with descriptions of new species. R.S. Aust. Mus. 7, 51–64.Google Scholar
†Womersley, H. (1941 b). New species of Geckobia (Acarina, Pterygosoniidae) from Australia and New Zealand. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aust. 65, 323–8.Google Scholar
Yamada, S. (1931). Observations on a house-infecting mite (Liponyssus nagayoi n.sp.) which attacks human beings. Dobtds Zasshi Tokyo, 43, 237–49.Google Scholar