Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:48:50.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further studies of cyclical transmission and antigenic variation of the ILDar 1 serodeme of Trypanosoma vivax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. R. Gardiner
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
R. Thatthi
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
H. Gathuo
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
R. Nelson
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
S. K. Moloo
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya

Summary

Antigenic variation in the ILDar 1 serodeme of the naturally rodent-infective stock of West African Trypanosoma vivax has been investigated following cyclical transmission. The immunofluorescent and immune lysis tests were employed with a panel of 39 variant-specific mouse antisera. When antigenically homogeneous, or mixed, populations were transmitted by tsetse flies to goats, the first peak parasitaemias arising in the goats were antigenic mixtures (up to 9 major, and several minor variants being recognized in some cases) from which the ingested variant was absent. Although first peak parasitaemias in similarly infected goats showed some variants in common, there was no obvious relationship between the VAT profiles in different goats. When these populations were expanded in irradiated mice, VAT heterogeneity was maintained with a tendency towards the development of predominant variants in some, but not all, instances. Six additional variants, derived following the growth of bloodstream form ILDat 1·9 in 37°C culture, were also represented in goat and mouse populations. Two further variants, isolated after cyclical development of ILDat 1·9-derived trypanosomes in vitro, were not present in the early parasitaemias in goats and mice.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barry, J. D. (1986). Antigen variation during Trypanosoma vivax infections of different host species. Parasitology 92, 5165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, J. D. & Gatjuo, H. (1984). Antigenic variation in Trypanosoma vivax: isolation of a serodeme. Parasitology 89, 4958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brun, R. & Moloo, S. K. (1982). In vitro cultivation of animal-infective forms of a West African Trypanosoma vivax stock. Acta Tropica 39, 135–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. F. & Shefard, C. C. (1963). A dialysis technique for preparing fluorescent antibody. Virology 20, 642–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarkson, M. J. & Awan, M. A. Q. (1969). The immune response of sheep to Trypanosoma vivax. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 63, 515–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowe, J. S., Barry, J. D., Luckins, A. G., Ross, C. A. & Vickerman, K. (1983). All metacyclic variable antigen types of Trypanosoma congolense identified using monoclonal antibody. Nature, London 306, 389–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dar, F. K. (1972). Antigenic variation of Trypanosoma vivax in cattle infected with strains from wild-caught tsetse flies. Tropical Animal Health and Production 4, 237–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dar, F. K., Paris, J. & Wilson, A. J. (1973). Serological studies on trypanosomiasis in East Africa. IV. Comparison of antigenic types of Trypanosoma vivax group organisms. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 67, 319–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Gee, A. L. W. (1980). Host–parasite relationships in Trypanosoma (Duttonella) vivax with special reference to the influence of antigenic variation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
De Gee, A. L. W., Shah, S. D. & Doyle, J. J. (1979). Trypanosoma vivax: sequence of antigenic variants in mice and goats. Experimental Parasitology 48, 352–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Gee, A. L. W., Shah, S. D. & Doyle, J. J. (1981). Trypanosoma vivax: host influence on appearance of variable antigen types. Experimental Parasitology 51, 392–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desowitz, R. S. (1963). Adaptation of trypanosomes to abnormal hosts. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 113, 7487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, K. M., Schoenbechler, M. J., Gingrich, J. B. (1982). Trypanosoma rhodesiense blood forms express all antigen specificities relevant to protection against metacyclic (insect form) challenge. Journal of Immunology 129, 1715–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardiner, P. R., Jones, T. W. & Cunningham, I. (1980). Antigenic analysis by immunofluorescence of in vitro-produced metacyclics of Trypanosoma brucei and their infections in mice. Journal of Protozoology 27, 316–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardiner, P. R., Thatthi, R., MoLoo, S. K. & Gray, A. R. (1984). Antigenic variation in the ILDar 1 serodeme of Trypanosoma vivax. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Baltimore, MD, USA Abstract no. 80.Google Scholar
Gardiner, P. R., Webster, P., Jenni, L. & MoLoo, S. K. (1986). Metacyclic Trypanosoma vivax possess a surface coat. Parasitology 92, 7582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajduk, S. L. (1984). Antigenic variation during the developmental cycle of Trypanosoma brucei. Journal of Protozoology 31, 4 1–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Hirumi, H., Nelson, R. T. & Hirumi, K. (1983). Complete cyclic development of Trypanosoma vivax in vitro. Journal of Protozoology 30, 6A, Abstract no. 22.Google Scholar
Jenni, L. & Brun, R. (1981). In vitro cultivation of pleomorphic Trypanosoma brucei stocks: a possible source of variable antigens for immunization studies. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 75, 150–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. W. & Clarkson, J. J. (1971). Antigenic variation of a tsetse transmissible strain of Trypanosoma vivax. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 65, 259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, T. W. & Clarkson, M. J. (1972). The effect of syringe and cyclical passage on antigenic variants of Trypanosoma vivax. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 66, 303–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, T. W. & Clarkson, M. J. (1974). The timing of antigenic variation in Trypanosoma vivax. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 68, 485–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanham, S. M. & Godfrey, D. G. (1970). Isolation of salivarian trypanosomes from man and other mammals using DEAE cellulose. Experimental Parasitology 28, 521–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeflang, P., Buys, J. & Blotkamp, C. (1976). Studies on Trypanosoma vivax. Infectivity and serial maintenance of natural bovine isolates in mice. International Journal for Parasitology 6, 413–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahan, S. M. (1984). Analysis of the humoral and cellular immune responses in C3H/He (susceptible) and C57 BL/6 (resistant) mice infected with the West African strain of T. vivax cattle parasites. Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Mews, A. R., Langley, P. A., Pimley, R. W. & Flood, M. E. I. (1977). Large-scale rearing of tsetse flies (Glossina spp.) in the absence of a living host. Bulletin of Entomological Research 67, 119–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, A. K. & Clarkson, M. J. (1982). Characterization of stocks of Trypanososna vivax. II. Immunological studies. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 76, 283–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nantulya, V. M., Musoke, A. J., MoLoo, S. K. & Ngaira, J. M. (1983). Analysis of the variable antigen composition of Trypanosoma brucei brucei metacyclic trypanosomes using monoclonal antibodies. Acta Tropica 40, 1924.Google ScholarPubMed