Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:06:28.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental infection of Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera) by Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda): host fecundity during infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Malefane Maema
Affiliation:
Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EE

Summary

Some effects of Hymenolepis diminuta on the fecundity of Tribolium confusum are described. Host fecundity is observed to be reduced exponentially with increasing parasite burden/host, although there are differences in the ability of individual hosts to respond to parasitism. Of particular interest is the finding that host fecundity is greatly reduced in young beetles on or by day 14 post-infection (p.i.). This age-related reduction in host fecundity is discussed in relation to the population dynamics of this hostr-parasite relationship.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. (1978). Regulation and stability of host–parasite population interactions. 1. Regulatory processes. Journal of Animal Ecology 47, 219–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arme, C. & Coates, A. (1971). Active transport of an amino acid by cysticercoid larvae of Hymenolepis diminuta. Journal of Parasitology 57, 1369–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arme, C. & Coates, A. (1973). Hymenolepis diminuta: active transport of α-aminoisobutyric acid by cysticercoid larvae. International Journal for Parasitology 3, 553–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arme, C., Middleton, A. & Scott, J. P. (1973). Absorption of glucose and sodium acetate by cysticercoid larvae of Hymenolepis diminula. Journal of Parasitology 59, 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hager, A. (1941). Effects of dietary modification on the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta. Iowa State College Journal of Science 16, 6067.Google Scholar
Hurd, H. & Arme, C. (1984 a). Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera): effect of metacestodes of Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda) on haemolymph amino acids. Parasitology 89, 245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hued, H. & Arme, C. (1984 b). Pathophysiology of Hymenolepis diminuta infections in Tenebrio molitor: effect of parasitism on haemolymph proteins. Parasitology 89, 253–62.Google Scholar
Jeffs, S. & Arme, C. (1984). Hymenolepis diminuta: protein synthesis in cysticercoids. Parasitology 88, 351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keymer, A. E. (1980). The influence of Hymenolepis diminuta on the survival and fecundity of the intermediate host, Tribolium confusum. Parasitology 81, 405–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keymer, A. E. (1981). Population dynamics of Hynienolepis diminuta in the intermediate host. Journal of Animal Ecology 50, 941–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keymer, A. E. (1982). The dynamics of infection of Tribolium confusum by Hymenolepis diminuta: the influence of exposure time and host density. Parasitology 84, 157–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keymer, A. E. & Anderson, R. M. (1979). The dynamics of infection of Tribolium confusum by Hymenolepis diminuta: the influence of infective stage density and spatial distribution. Parasitology 79, 195207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, R. M. & Anderson, R. M. (1978). Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions. II. Destabilizing processes. Journal of Animal Ecology 47, 249–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schom, C., Novak, M. & Evans, W. S. (1981). Evolutionary implications of Tribolium confusum-Hymenolepis citelli interactions. Parasitology 83, 7790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voge, M. & Heyneman, D. (1957). Development of Hymenolepis nana and Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Hymenolepididae) in the intermediate host Triboliunm confusum. University of California Publications in Zoology 59, 549–80.Google Scholar