Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:40:05.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence for population self-regulation, reproductive competition and arrhenotoky in a thelastomatid nematode of cockroaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

S. Zervos
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 1, New Zealand

Summary

Experimental infection of adult Drymaplaneta variegata Shelford, 1909 (Blattodea) with known numbers of eggs of Protrellus dixoni Zervos, 1987 (Nematoda: Thelastomatidae) showed that each infrapopulation was regulated by a density-dependent and sex-dependent reduction in infection intensity with infrapopulation age. This reduction was not equal in initial speed or intensity between the sexes (reduction in number of males was faster) and led to infrapopulations with never more than a single adult male, 1–8 (usually 1–3) adult females and 0–28 juvenile females. In structure, these laboratory-produced infrapopulations resembled those in field-collected hosts. Parasite-mediated chemical interference competition is suggested as the cause of infrapopulation regulation. Per capita egg production was greater in uncrowded worms which suggests that self-regulation benefits those nematodes that survive competition. Unmated females produced male offspring only (probably by arrhenotokous parthenogenesis). Only females that occurred with a male produced females although some also produced males; such females may avoid insemination or prevent fertilization of some or all eggs. Female offspring probably result from amphimixis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adamson, M. L. (1981 a). Studies on gametogenesis in Gyrinicola batrachiensis (Walton, 1929) (Oxyuroidea: Nematoda). Canadian Journal of Zoology 59, 1368–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, M. L. (1981 b). Development and transmission of Gyrinicola batrachiensis (Walton, 1929) Adamson, 1981 (Pharyngodonidae: Oxyuroidea). Canadian Journal of Zoology 59, 1351–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, M. L. (1983). L'haplodiplodie des Oxyurida. Incidence de ce phénomène dans le cycle évolutif. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 59, 387413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, M. L. (1984 a). Haplodiploidy in Aspiculuris tetraptera (Nitzch) (Heteroxynematidae) and Syphacia obvelata (Rudolphi) (Oxyuridae), nematode (Oxyurida) parasitesof Mus musculus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62, 804–7.Google Scholar
Adamson, M. L. (1984 b). Anatomical adaptation to haplodiploidy in oxyuroid (Nematoda) Desmicola skrjabini n.sp. from a diplopod in Gaboon. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 59, 95–9.Google Scholar
Adamson, M. L. & Petter, A. J. (1983 a). Studies on gametogenesis in Tachygonetria vivipara Wedl, 1862 and Thelandros alatus Wedl, 1962 (Oxyuroidea: Nematoda) from Uromastix acanthinurus in Morocco. Candian Journal of Zoology 61, 2357–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, M. L. & Petter, A. J. (1983 b). Haplodiploidy in pharyngodonid (Oxyuroidea: Nematoda) parasites of Testudo graeca. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 58, 267–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, G. (1982). The Masterpiece of Nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Borgia, G. (1980). Evolution of haplodiploidy: models for inbred and outbred systems. Theoretical Population Biology 17, 103–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S. W. (1964). Automatic frequency response in the evolution of male haploidy and other coccid chromosome systems. Genetics 49, 797817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, J. M. & Nickle, W. R. (1968). On the classification and life-history of Fergusobia curriei (Sphaerulariidae: Nematoda). Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 35, 4060.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1975). The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1967). Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156, 477–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartl, D. L. (1971). Some aspects of natural selection in arrhenotokous populations. American Zoologist 11, 309–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartl, D. L. & Brown, S. W. (1970). The origin of male haploid genetic systems and their expected sex ratio. Theoretical Population Biology 1, 165–90.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. C. (1975). The identity of the Gisborne cockroach (Blattodea). New Zealand Entomologist 6, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickle, W. R. (1974). Nematode infections. In InsectDiseases. Vol.2 (ed. Cantwell, G. E.), pp. 327376. New York: Dekker.Google Scholar
Poinar, G. O. & Hansen, E. (1983). Sex and reproductive modifications in nematodes. Helminthological Abstracts (B) 52, 145–63.Google Scholar
Ramsay, G. W. (1975). Appendix to the Gisborne cockroach. New Zealand Entomologist 6, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. (1978). Ecological Methods. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Triantphyllou, A. C. (1973). Environmental sex differentiation of nematodes in relation to pest management. Annual Review of Phytopathology 11, 441–62.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. & Hare, H. (1976). Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191, 249–63.Google Scholar
Zervos, S. (1986). Population regulation of thelastomatid nematodes (Nematoda: Thelastomatidae) of cockroaches. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Zervos, S. (1987). Protrellus dixoni n.sp. (Nematoda: Thelastomatidae) fromtheAustralian cockroach Drymaplaneta variegata. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 14, 251–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zervos, S. (1988). Population dynamics of a thelastomatid nematode of cockroaches. Parasitology 96, 353–68.Google Scholar