Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:15:51.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemiology of Heligmosomoides polygyrus in mice: experiments on natural transmission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. F. G. Slater
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS
A. E. Keymer
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS

Summary

An experimental system is described for the study of the community dynamics of helminth–host populations, using Heligmosomoides polygyrus in the laboratory mouse. The results of a preliminary experiment using closed populations of 50 mice revealed that coexistence of host and parasite occurs for at least 4 months in the absence of immigration, with the generation of epidemiological patterns similar to those observed in the real world. In well-nourished mice the prevalence and intensity of infection initially increased with time and then declined, probably as a result of acquired immunity. The prevalence and intensity of infection increased less rapidly among hosts fed on a low protein diet, but continued to rise over the entire duration of the experiment. This continued rise is interpreted as evidence of a negative effect of protein malnutrition on host immunocompetence. The frequency distributions of parasite numbers/host were over-dispersed in each mouse population. No density dependence in parasite fecundity was detected. Aspiculuris tetraptera was also found to be present in the mouse populations. This parasite was not transmitted between mice fed on a high protein diet, but rose to a prevalence of 80 % in protein malnourished animals. No association between the intensity of A. tetraptera and H. polygyrus could be detected in individual hosts. The results are discussed in terms of the future potential of the system for the investigation of the role of acquired immunity (and its genetic control) in the generation of epidemiological patterns.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. M. (1982). Population dynamics and control of hookworm and roundworm infections. In Population Dynamics of Infectious Diseases: Theory and Applications (ed. Anderson, R. M.), pp. 67108. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. (1985). Helminth infections of humans: mathematical models, population dynamics and control. Advances in Parasitology 24, 1101.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. M. & Medley, G. F. (1985). Community control of helminth infections of man by mass and selective chemotherapy. Parasitology 90, 629–60.Google Scholar
Bawden, R. J. (1969). Some effects of the diet of mice on Nematospiroides dubius (Nematoda). Parasitology 59, 203–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnke, J. M. & Parish, H. A. (1979). Nematospiroides dubius: the arrested development of larvae in immune mice. Experimental Parasitology 47, 116–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behnke, J. M. & Robinson, M. (1985). Genetic control of immunity to Nematospiroides dubius: a 9 day anthelmintic abbreviated immunising regime which separates weak and strong responder strains of mice. Parasite Immunology 7, 235–53.Google Scholar
Bryant, V. (1973). The life cycle of Nematospiroides dubius, Baylis 1926 (Nematoda: Heligmosomidae). Journal of Helminthology 67, 263–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandra, R. K. (1984). Parasitic infection, nutrition, and immune response. Federation Proceedings 43, 251–5.Google Scholar
Crombie, J. A. & Anderson, R. M. (1985). Population dynamics of Schistosoma mansoni in mice repeatedly exposed to infection. Nature, London 315, 491–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crompton, D. W. T. (1984). Influences of parasitic infection on host food intake. Federation Proceedings 43, 239–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Crompton, D. W. T., Walters, D. E. & Arnold, S. (1981). Changes in the food intake and body weight of protein-malnourished rats infected with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nematoda). Parasitology 82, 2338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, A. & Keymer, A. E. (1986). Factors affecting the reliability of the McMaster technique. Journal of Helminthology (submitted).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenner, F. (1948). The epizootic behaviour of mousepox (infectious ectromelia of mice). II. The course of events in long continued epidemics. Journal of Hygiene 46, 383–93.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M., Bradford-Hill, A., Topley, W. W. C. & Wilson, J. (1936). Experimental Epidemiology: Medical Research Council Special Report No. 209 (HMSO, London).Google Scholar
Jacobsen, R. M., Brooks, B. O. & Cypess, R. H. (1982). Immunity to Nematospiroides dubius: parasite stages responsible for and subject to resistance in high responder (LAF1/J) mice. Journal of Parasitology 68, 1053–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerboeuf, D. (1978). The effect of time and temperature of storage on the infectivity of third-stage larvae of Heligmosomoides polygyrus ( = Nematospiroides dubius). I. Effects on the development to the adult stage in mice. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 9, 153–9.Google Scholar
Keymer, A. E. & Hiorns, R. W. (1986 a). Heligmosomoides polygyrus: the dynamics of primary and repeated infection in outbred mice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (submitted).Google Scholar
Keymer, A. E. & Hiorns, R. W. (1986 b). Faecal egg counts and nematode fecundity: Heligmosomoides polygyrus and laboratory mice. Parasitology 93, 189203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, P. W. (1980). Evolutionary Biology of Parasites. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Slater, A. F. G. & Keymer, A. E. (1986). Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda): the influence of dietary protein on the dynamics of repeated infection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (submitted).Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. (1984). Evasion of the immune response: survival within low responder individuals of the host population. In Parasite Evasion of the Immune Response. Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology, vol. 21 (ed. R. M. E. Parkhouse). Parasitology 88 (4), 639–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar