Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:44:10.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of the tegument and alimentary tract in a trematode, Fellodistomum fellis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

D. W. Halton  and
J. M. McCrae
D. W. Halton
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The Queen's University, Belfast BT7 1NN
J. M. McCrae
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The Queen's University, Belfast BT7 1NN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Formation of the tegument and alimentary tract in developing Fellodistomum fellis cercariae has been examined by electron microscopy. Morphogenesis of the tegument is a two-stage event: (1) ectodermal cells at the germ ball periphery coalesce beneath a closely apposed and transitory primitive epithelium of sporocyst origin, forming a syncytial boundary of nucleated tegument. The primitive epithelium is then lost and the nuclei in the surface layer of the early tegument degenerate; (2) cells in the mesenchyme of the cercarial embryo differentiate as secretory cells and connect with the anucleate layer to form the true tegument. The foregut develops as an apical invagination of early nucleated tegument, with the primordial digestive cells differentiating behind the oesophagus. When fully formed, the surface anucleate layer of oesophagus tegument extends posteriorly over the apposed surfaces of the developing digestive cells, thus isolating them from each other and from the gut lumen. An apical cavity develops in each of the digestive cells and later communicates with the gut lumen through a pore in the overlying caecal tegument. Lamellated extensions of digestive cell cytoplasm project into the cavity, and development of GER and a Golgi apparatus in the cell mark the onset of digestive secretion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 193 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basch, P. F. & Dlconza, J. J. (1977). In vitro development of Shistosoma mansoni. Journal of Parasitology 63, 245–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, S. C. (1975). Biochemical and cytochemical studies of digestive-absorptive functions of esophagus, cecum and tegument in Schistosoma mansoni: acid phosphatase and tracer studies. Journal of Parasitology 61, 633–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halton, D. W. (1982). An unusual structural organization to the gut of a digenetic trematode, Fellodistomum fellis. Parasitology 85, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, E. L. (1975). Secondary daughter sporocysts of Shistosoma mansoni: their occurrence and cultivation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 266, 426–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockley, D. J. (1972). Schistosoma mansoni: the development of the cercarial tegument. Parasitology 64, 245–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meuleman, E. A. & Holzmann, P. J. (1975). The development of the primitive epithelium and true tegument in the cercaria of Schistosoma mansoni. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 45, 307–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meuleman, E. A., Holzmann, P. J. & Peet, R. C. (1980). The development of daughter sporocysts inside the mother sporocyst of Shistosoma mansoni with special reference to the ultrastructure of the body wall. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 61, 201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R. D. & Halton, D. W. (1983). Functional morphology of the tegument of Corrigia vitta (Trematoda: Dicrocoeliidae). Zeit schrift für Parasitenkunde 69, 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, J. D. & Halton, D. W. (1983). The Physiology of Trematodes (2nd Edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ubelaker, J. E. (1977). Recent studies on the structure and function of schistosome tegument. In Symposium on Experimental Parasitology of Host-Parasite Interfaces, Texas Journal of Science, Special Publication no. 2, 29–43.Google Scholar