Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:06:30.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of the tapeworm Diphyllobothrium latum (L. 1756)(Cestoda; Pseudophyllidea) in its definitive hosts, with special references to the growth patterns of D. dendriticum (Nitzsch, 1824) and D. ditremum (Creplin, 1827)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Karin Andersen
Karin Andersen
Affiliation:
Zoological Museum, University of Oslo, Sars gt. 1, Oslo 5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

When Diphyllobothrium latum develops from larva to adult in a definitive host, it first sheds the entire larval ‘body’ before growth of an adult strobila starts. This process of shedding off the entire larval abothrial extremity, piece by piece, takes about 48 h. By this time the larva has usually reached the anterior third of the small intestine of the host. D. dendriticum and D. ditremum develop quite differently, although exhibiting similar anterior migrations. In these two species the larvae develop directly into adults without the larval ‘bodyRsquo; first being shed. The implications of the observed differences in growth pattern between these three species of Diphyllobothrium to the classification of diphyllobothriid cestodes is discussed briefly.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , August 1978 , pp. 111 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, K. (1972). Studies on the helminth fauna of Norway. XXIX. The morphology of Diphyllobothrium ditremum (Creplin, 1825) from golden hamster (Mesocrisetus auratus Waterhouse 1839) and a comparison with D. dendriticum (Nitzsch, 1824) and D. latum (L. 1758) from the same final host. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 20, 255–64.Google Scholar
Andersen, K. (1975). Comparison of surface topography of three species of Diphyllobothrium (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea) by scanning electron microscopy. International Journal for Parasitology 5, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, K. (1977). A marine Diphyllobothrium plerocercoid (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea) from blue whiting (Micromestius pontasson). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 52, 289–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, D. M. & Hopkins, C. A. (1958). Studies on cestode metabolism, III. Growth pattern of Diphyllobothrium sp. in a definitive host. Experimental Parasitology 7, 125–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bråten, T. (1966). Studies on the helminth fauna of Norway. VII. Growth, fecundity, and fertility of Diphyllobothrium norvegicum Vik, (Cestoda) in the golden hamster. Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 13, 39–51.Google Scholar
Bylund, G. (1969). Experimental undersökning av Diphyllobothrium dendriticum (= D. norvegicum) från norra Finland. Tiedoksianto-Information 10, 3–17.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, O. (1970). Studies of the helminth fauna of Norway, XV. On the taxonomy and biology of plerocercoids of Diphyllobothrium Cobbold, 1858 (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea) from North-western Europe. Nytt magasin for Zoologi 18, 113–74.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, O. & Andersen, K. (1974). Some effects of population density in infections of Diphyllobothrium dendriticum (Nitzsch) in golden hamster (Mesocrisetus auratus Water. house) and common gull (Larus canus L.). Parasitology 69, 149–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorsen, O. & Wissler, K. (1973). Studies on the helminth fauna of Norway. XXVIII. An experimental study of the ability of Diphyllobothrium latum (L.), D. dendriticum (Nitzsch), and D. jitremum (Creplin) (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea) to infect paratenic hosts. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 21, 201–10.Google Scholar
Iawata, S. (1933). Some experimental and morphological studies on the post embryonal development of Manson's tapeworm Diphyllobothrium erinacei (Rudolphi). Japanese Journal of Zoology 5, 209–47.Google Scholar
Janicki, C. & Rosen, F. (1917). Die Entwicklungszyklus von Dibothriocephalus latus L. Correspondez B1att für Schweizer Aerzte 47, 1505–17.Google Scholar
Joyeux, C. & Baer, J. G. (1931). Evolution des Plérocercoides de Diphyllobothrium (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea). Biologie Comptes Rendus 108, 97–9.Google Scholar
Kuhlow, F. (1953). Bau und differential Diagnose heimischer Diphyllobothrium-plerocercoide. Zeitschrift für Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie 4, 186–202.Google Scholar
Magath, T. B. (1929). Experimental studies on Diphyllobothrium latum. American Journal of Tropical Medicine 9, 17–47.Google Scholar
Müller, J. F. (1937). A reparition of the genus Diphyllobothrium. Journal of Parasitology 23, 308–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J. F. (1959). Physiologic studies on the larval and adult scolex of Spirometra mansonoides. Journal of Parasitology 45, 30–1.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1959). Maturation of larval pseudophyllidean cestodes and strigeid trematodes under axenic conditions; the significance of nutritional levels in platyhelminth development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 77, 102–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1976). Introduction to Animal Parasitology. London, Sydney, Auckland and Toronto: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Vik, R. (1957). Studies of the helminth fauna of Norway. I. Taxonomy and ecology of Diphyllobothrium norvegicum n.sp. and the plerocercoid of Diphyllobothrium latum (L.). Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 5, 25–93.Google Scholar
Vik, R., Halvorsen, O. & Andersen, K. (1969). Observations on Diphyllobothrium plerocercoids in threespined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. from the river Elbe. Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 17, 163–75.Google Scholar
Wardle, R. A. (1933). Significant factors in the plerocercoid environment of Diphyllobothrium latum (Linn.). Journal of Helminthology 11, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, R. A. & McColl, E. L. (1937). The taxonomy of Diphyllobothrium latum (Linné, 1758) in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Research 9, 163–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, R. A. & Green, N. K. (1941). The rate of growth of the tapeworm Diphyllobothrium latum (L.). Canadian Journal of Research 19, 245–51.Google Scholar
Wikgren, B. J. & Bylund, G. (1964). Identifiering av diphyllobothrida plerocercoider. Tiedoksianto-Informnation 2, 1–27.Google Scholar
Yamane, Y., Maejima, J. & Kamo, H. (1974). Study of Spirometra erinacei (Rudolphi, 1819) Faust, Campbell and Kellogg, 1929) through scanning electron microscope. Yonago Acta medica 18, 84–93.Google Scholar