Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:08:18.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The control of trichostrongyle larvae (Nematoda) by fumigation in relation to their bionomics

I. Bionomics results*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. F. Sturrock
R. F. Sturrock
Affiliation:
Research Scholar of the Animal Health Trust, Imperial College Field Station, Sunninghill, Berks†.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Laboratory experiments indicated that third-stage larvae of T. axei and T colubriformis were able to penetrate soil to a depth of 12 in. or more, although most larvae remained in the upper 2 in. No geotaxis was observed.

Heavy downflows of water caused severe mortalities but did not affect the rate of movement of surviving larvae through the soil. Very limited random lateral movement occurred in turf, being more pronounced in the presence of faeces. Prolonged desiccation was extremely lethal to infective larvae. The activity of larvae was directly and linearly proportional to normal temperatures. The average activity of groups of larvae declined with time.

The author wishes to acknowledge the assistance and facilities provided by Professor B. G. Peters and the other members of staff of Imperial College Field Station, and to thank Dr C. W. R. Spedding for helpful criticism and supplying culture lambs; and Dr T. E. Gibson and Dr P. Silverman for supplying pure cultures of trichostrongyle larvae.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , February 1965 , pp. 29 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, D. W. (1939). Survival of worm parasite infection on New York State pastures. Cornell Vet. 29, 45–8.Google Scholar
Bouyoucos, G. J. (1954). New type electrode for plaster of paris moisture blocks. J. Soil Sci. 78, 339–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, S. R. & Kendall, D. G. (1953). The random walk of Trichostrongylus retortaeformis. Biometrics, 9, 460–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, J. J. C. (1940). Observations on the vertical migrations of infective larvae of certain bursate nematodes. J. Helminth. 18, 173–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofton, H. D. (1948). The ecology of immature phases of trichostrongyle nematodes. I. The vertical distribution of infective larvae of Trichostrongylus retortaeformis in relation to their habitat. Parasitology, 39, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crofton, H. D. (1954). The vertical migration of infective larvae of strongyloid nematodes. J. Helminth. 28, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinaburg, A. G. (1944). The survival of the infective larvae of the common ruminant stomach worm, Haemonchus contortus, on outdoor grass plots. Am. J. vet. Res. 5, 32–7.Google Scholar
Enigk, K. (1953). Die Bodendesinfektion mit Methylbromide. Dt. tierärztl. Wschr. 60, 131–2.Google Scholar
Furman, D. P. (1944). The effects of environment upon the free-living stages of Ostertagia circumcincta (Stadelmann) Trichostrongylidae. I. Laboratory experiments. Am. J. vet. Res. 5, 79–86.Google Scholar
Lucker, J. S. (1936). Extent of vertical migration of horse strongyles in soils of different types. J. agric. Res. 52, 353–61.Google Scholar
Payne, F. K. (1922). Investigations on the control of hookworm disease. XI. Vertical migrations of infective hookworm larvae in soil. (Preliminary report.) Am. J. Hyg. 2, 254–64.Google Scholar
Payne, F. K. (1923 a). Investigation on the control of hookworm disease. XIV. Field experiments on the vertical migration of hookworm larvae. (Preliminary report.) Am.J. Hyg. 3, 46–58.Google Scholar
Payne, F. K. (1923 b). Investigations on the control of hookworm disease. XXXI. The relation of the physiological age of hookworm larvae to their ability to infect the human host. Am. J. Hyg. 3, 584–98.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (1953). Changes in potato root eelworm population with time and depth. J. Helminth. 27, 113–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, W. P. (1940 a). The effects of environmental conditions on the accessibility of third stage trichostrongyle larvae to grazing animals. Parasitology, 32, 208–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, W. P. (1940 b). The physiological aging of the infective larvae of Haemonchus contortus. J. Helminth. 18, 183–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, J. H. (1957). Observations on the bionomics of the free-living first stage larvae of the sheep lungworm, Muellerius capillaris. J. Helminth. 31, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, P. H. & Campbell, J. A. (1959). Studies on parasitic worms of sheep in Scotland. I. Embryonic and larval development of Haemonchus contortus at constant conditions. Parasitology, 49, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solomon, M. E. (1951). Control of humidity with potassium hydroxide, sulphuric acid or other solutions. Bull. ent. Res. 42, 543–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, M. A. & Douglas, J. R. (1938). Studies on the bionomics of Trichostrongylus axei (Cobbold) and its seasonal incidence on irrigated pasture. Parasitology, 30, 477–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturrock, R. F. (1961). The quantitative use of the Seinhorst ‘Mistifier’ to recover nematodes from soil, faeces and herbage. J. Helminth. 35, 309–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, H. R. (1958). The movement of eelworms. III. The relations between eelworm length, activity and mobility. Ann. appl. Biol. 46, 662–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, H. R. (1959). The movement of eelworms. IV. The influence of water percolation. Ann. appl. Biol. 47, 131–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar