Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T03:49:55.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The control of trichostrongyle larvae (Nematoda) by fumigation in relation to their bionomics

III. Field trials with methyl bromide*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. F. Sturrock
Affiliation:
Research Scholar of the Animal Health Trust, Imperial College Field Station, Sunninghill, Berks.

Extract

In a small-scale trial in which boxes of grass infested with Trichostrongylus colubriformis were treated with methyl bromide, a dose of 100 mg. hr./l. prevented guinea-pigs picking up the infection when they grazed the grass at a later date. A practical method is described for fumigating small areas of pasture. In a field trial, sheep were used to test plots of pasture fumigated with doses which did not kill the grass but the results were inconclusive. These experiments are discussed and also the possible value and applications of this technique.

I am indebted to Professor B. G. Peters and to the other members of the Imperial College Field Station, particularly Dr A. B. Page and Dr O. F. Lubatti, for their help and criticism during the work. Thanks are also due to Dr William Davies, the Director of the Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, for permission to carry out the field experiment there, and also to Dr C. R. W. Spedding and Mr T. Brown for their co-operative assistance and advice throughout this work.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chisholm, R. P. & Koblitzky, L. (1943). Sorption of methyl bromide by soil. J. econ. Ent. 36, 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enigk, K. (1953). Die Bodendesinfection mit Methyl bromide. Dt. tierärztl. Wschr. 60, 131–2.Google Scholar
Hanneson, H. A. (1945). Movement of carbon disulphide vapour in soils. Hilgardia, 16, 503.Google Scholar
Herlich, H., Douvres, F. W. & Isenstein, R. S. (1956). Experimental infections of guinea pigs with Trichostrongylus colubriformis, a parasite of ruminants. Proc. helm. Soc. Wash. 23, 104–5.Google Scholar
Kryzgenkov, A. N. & Kreitsburg, V. E. (1957). Hygienic evaluation of products treated with methyl bromide. Gig. i Sanit., Moscow, 22, 86–8.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. E. & Eccleston, K. (1946). Residues in wheat flour fumigated with methyl bromide. J. Soc. chem. Ind., Lond., 65, 149–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturrock, R. F. (1963). Observations on the use of Trichostrongylus colubriformis (Nematoda) infections of guinea pigs for laboratory experiments. Parasitology, 53, 189–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturrock, R. F. (1965 a). The control of trichostrongyle larvae (Nematoda) by fumigation in relation to their bionomics. I. Bionomics results. Parasitology, 55, 2944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sturrock, R. F. (1965 b). The control of Trichostrongyle larvae (Nematoda) by fumigation in relation to their bionomics. II. Laboratory toxicity trials with methyl bromide. Parasitology, 55, 4565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, L. E. & Taylor, A. L. (1943). Control of cattle-parasite and free-living nematodes by soil fumigation with methyl bromide. Proc. helm. Soc. Wash. 10, 13.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. L. & McBeth, C. W. (1941). A practical method for applying methyl bromide as a nematicide in the field. Proc. helm. Soc. Wash. 8, 26–8.Google Scholar
Viollier, G. & Scheidegger, S. (1947). Feeding small laboratory animals with bread fumigated with methyl bromide. Helv. physiol. Acta, 50, 1920.Google Scholar
Winteringham, F. P. W. (1955). The fate of labelled insecticide residues in food products. IV. The possible toxicological and nutritional significance of fumigating wheat with methyl bromide. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 5, 269–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar