Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:58:23.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative analysis of parasite species richness of Iberian rodents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1997

C. FELIU
Affiliation:
Laboratori de Parasitologia, Facultat de Farmàcia. Universitat de Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
F. RENAUD
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Parasitologie Comparée (UMR 5555 CNRS), Université Montpellier II, place E. Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France
F. CATZEFLIS
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR 5554 CNRS), Université Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France
J.-P. HUGOT
Affiliation:
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire de Biologie parasitaire (URA 114b CNRS), 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
P. DURAND
Affiliation:
Centre de Biologie et d'Ecologie tropicale et méditerranéenne (UMR 5555 CNRS), Université de Perpignan, 66860 Perpignan-Cedex, France
S. MORAND
Affiliation:
Centre de Biologie et d'Ecologie tropicale et méditerranéenne (UMR 5555 CNRS), Université de Perpignan, 66860 Perpignan-Cedex, France

Abstract

Data on parasites of rodents, collected over an 18-year period on the Iberian peninsula, were used to find the determinants of parasite species richness. A total of 77 species of helminth parasites (nematodes, cestodes and digeneans) was identified among 16 species of rodents. Parasites were classified into groups according to their specificity towards their host and their life-cycle. A working phylogeny of the rodents was proposed on the basis of molecular and paleontological data and for each host the following parameters were recorded: sample size, weight, geographical range, longevity, and life-style. Two comparative methods were used, the independent comparisons method of Pagel (1992) and the distance matrix method of Legendre, Lapointe & Casgrain (1995). The second method has the advantage of measuring the relative contribution of phylogeny. Both methods gave similar results. Overall parasite species richness correlated only with host sample size. Host body size does not correlate with any subset of parasite species richness. However, host phylogeny is a good predicator of specific parasites and the species richness of digeneans correlates with host geographical range. A phylogenetic reconstruction of host relations was performed using the parasites belonging to subgroups in which richness is correlated with host phylogeny. These parasite species were treated as Dollo characters, i.e. we made the assumption that the loss of a parasite species is irreversible. The consensus tree obtained reflects the major phylogenetic divisions of the host group. Finally, this study illustrates the relative importance of processes acting at different temporal and spatial scales (evolutionary time and actual geographical range of hosts) in determining the structure of helminth parasite fauna.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)