Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:14:50.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chimaerocestos prudhoei gen. et sp. nov., representing a new family of tetraphyllideans and the first record of strobilate tapeworms from a holocephalan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. H. Williams
Affiliation:
The Open University in Wales, Cardiff, and Department of Zoology, National Museum of Wales, Cardiff
R. A. Bray
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5 BD

Summary

Chimaerocestos prudhoei gen. et sp. nov. from Rhinochimaera atlantica in the North Atlantic off north-eastern Scotland represents a new family, the Chimaerocestidae, of tetraphyllideans and is the first record of a strobilate tapeworm from a holocephalan. The main taxonomic features are described and figured along with aspects of the ecology and mode of attachment to the gut mucosa. The lobed annular ovary and distribution of the vitellarium in two fields are characteristic features. About 15 eggs are deposited together in capsules. C. prudhoei is discussed in relation to other unusual fish tapeworms and the evolutionary biology of tapeworms, and to our scant knowledge of the holocephalans.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Campbell, R. A. (1977). A new family of Pseudophylidean cestodes from deep-sea teleost Acanthochaenus lutkenii Gill 1884. Journal of Parasitology 63, 301–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway Morris, S. (1981). Parasites and the fossil record. Parasitology 82, 489509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crompton, D. W. T. (1973). The sites occupied by some parasitic helminths in the alimentary tract of vertebrates. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 48, 2783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dailey, M. D. (1969). Litobothrium alopias and L. conformis, two new cestodes respresenting a new order from elasmobranch fishes. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 36, 218–24.Google Scholar
Dailey, M. D. & Overstreet, R. M. (1973). Cathetocephalus thatcheri gen. et sp.n. (Tetraphyllidea: Cathetocephalidae fam.n.) from the bull shark: a species demonstrating multistrobilization. Journal of Parasitology 59, 469–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienske, H. (1968). A survey of the metazoan parasites of the rabbit-fish, Chimaera monstrosa L. (Holocephali). Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 4, 3258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorsen, O. & Williams, H. H. (1968). Studies of the helminth fauna of Norway. IX. Gyrocotyle (Platyhelminthes) in Chimaera monstrosa from Olso Fjord, with emphasis on its mode of attachment and a regulation in the degree of infection. Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 15, 130–42.Google Scholar
Hopkins, C. A. (1959) Seasonal variations in the incidence and development of the cestode Proteocephalus filicollis (Rud. 1810) in Gasterosteus aculeatus (L. 1766). Parasitology 49, 529–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johri, L. N. & Smyth, J. D. (1956). A histochemical approach to the study of helminth morphology. Parasitology 46, 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1965). The evolution of parasitic platyhelminths. Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology 3, 4778.Google Scholar
Lund, R. (1977). New information on the evolution of Bradyodont Chondrichthyes. Fieldiana Geology 33, 521–37.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. S. (1976). Fishes of the World. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Noble, E. R. & Noble, G. A. (1976). Parasitology. The Biology of Animal Parasites. Philadelphia; Lea and Febiger.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. (1965). The phylogeny of the chimaeroids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 249, 101219.Google Scholar
Polyansky, Y. I. (1958). Ecology of parasites of marine fishes. In Parasitology of Fishes (ed. Dogiel, V. A., Petrushevsky, G. K. and Polyansky, Y. I.) pp. 4883. Leningrad University Press (English translation by Z. Kabata (1961); Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.)Google Scholar
Rees, G. (1959). Ditrachybothridium macrocephalum gen.nov., sp.nov., a cestode from some elasmobranch fishes. Parasitology 49, 191209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, G. D. (1969). Dioecotaenia cancellata (Linton, 1890) gen. et comb. n., dioecious cestode (Tetraphyllidea) from the cow-nosed ray, Rhinoptera bonasus (Mitchell), in Chesapeake Bay, with the proposal of a new family, Dioecotaeniidae. Journal of Parasitology 55, 271–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinde, G. B. & Chincholikar, L. N. (1975). A new family of cestode, Shindeobothriidae (Tetraphyllidae Carus, 1863) from marine fish at Ratnagiri in India. Marathwada University Journal of Science 14, 349–53.Google Scholar
Wagener, R. G. (1852) Ueber einen neuen in der Chimaera monstrosa gefundenen EingeweideWurm, Amphiptyches urna Grube und Wagener. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschafthche Medizin 543–54.Google Scholar
Wardle, R. A. & McLeod, J. A. (1952). The Zoology of Tapeworms. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 780 pp.Google Scholar
Williams, H. H. (1966). The ecology, functional morphology and taxonomy of Echeneibothrium Beneden, 1849 (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea), a revision of the genus and comments on Discobothrium Beneden, 1870, Pseudanthobothrium Baer, 1956, and Phormobothrium Alexander, 1963. Parasitology 56, 227–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, H. H. & Bray, R. A. (1982). A new family and the first record of tapeworms from chimaeroid fish. In Parasites — Their World and Ours, Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Parasitology, Toronto. Elsevier Amsterdam: Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R. (1981). Handbook of Paleoichthyology. Chondrichthyes, I. Paleozoie Elasmobranchii. Stuttgart and New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar