Abe, , Nakao, (24. 09. 1907), Ueber den Nachweis von Typhusbazillen in den Läusen Typhuskranker. München. med. Wochenschr., LIV. 1924. D.Google Scholar

Adler-Herzmark, J. (10. 07. 1915), Fleckfieberfälle und Entlausungsmethoden. Der Militärarzt, Wien, XLIX. 258–264, 4 figs. D.K.Google Scholar

Albin, E. (1736), A natural history of spiders and other curious insects. 76 pp., 53 Pls. 4°. London, [ pp. 70–74 quotes Hooke's description of the louse and on PI. 42 reproduces Hooke's figure of the ♀.] O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcock, A. (1911), Entomology for Medical Officers. London: Gurney and Jackson. xx + 374 pp.,. 136 Figs. [pp. 212–216, Figs. 94–6, Pediculi. Fig. 94 shows a ‘food reservoir’ alongside the ‘stomach’; such a reservoir does not exist. The structure, probably drawn by transparency without dissection, is an egg.] G.Google Scholar

Aldrovandus, U. (1638), De animalibus insectis; libri septem, cum singulorum iconibus ad vivum expressis [etc.]. 4, p. 1, 767 pp., 21. 1, Pls., Figs. Fol. Bononiae. [S.]Google Scholar

Alessandrini, G. (29. 02. 1916), I pidocchi ed i mezzi per distruggerli. Ann. d' Igiene, Rome, XXVI. 92–108, 3 Figs. [Chiefly a compilation dealing with methods of destruction; brief description of structure and biology, somewhat inaccurate.] A.B.D.Google Scholar

Allan, G. (4. 05. 1912), The treatment of pediculosis capitis. Med. Times, London, XL. 348–9. K.Google Scholar

Allan, J. W. (4. 12. 1915), Typhus fever and lice. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 841. [Short letter. Author thinks typhus may be conveyed otherwise than by lice.] O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allbutt, Sir T. C. and Rolleston, H. D. (1909–1911). System of Medicine. London: Macmillan. [Pediculosis, vol. IX. 158–159, by Malcolm Morris; Pediculi and Plague, II. ii. 374, in section by Bulloch and Douglas; Beriberi, II. ii. 627, by Sir P. Hanson; Ph. pubis, ix. 556.] D.Google Scholar

Allen, C. W. (1892), Nomenclature of pediculosis. Boston Med. and Surg. Journ., CXXVI. 440. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, C. W. (1905), Pediculosis vestimentorum. Post-Graduate, New York, XX. 46. [I.M.]Google Scholar

Alt, H. C. (1824), De Phtiriasi (Dissertation), Bonn. 8°. [s.] [p. 8 Pediculus tabescentium, Alt, 1824. According to Piaget, 1880, p. 625, the species is invalid, being merely P. vestimenti as Landois pointed out. Goldfusz and Burmeister merely copied from Alt.] S.Google Scholar

Amatus, L. (ca. 1560), De Phtiriasi. Curatium cum medicinalium cuturae. Basiliae. [M.]Google Scholar

Amelung, F. (1837), Beobaehtungen und Bemerkungen über die Läuse-krankheit. Journ. d. pract. Heilk., Berlin, LXXXV., 2. St., 13–45. [I.C.]Google Scholar

Anderson, J. F. (1915), Typhus Fever. Its etiology and the methods of its prevention. U.S. Public Health Rep., XXX. 1303–1311. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. F. and Goldberger, J. (10. 12. 1909), On the relation of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever to the typhus fever of Mexico. Preliminary note. Publ. Health Reports, Washington, XXIV. 1861–1862. Also in Collected Studies on Typhus. Hyg. Lab.—Bull., No. 86 (Oct. 1912), pp. 9–10. Treas. Dept. U.S.P.H. Service, Washington. [Regard the fevers as distinct.] D.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. F. and Goldberger, J. (24. 12. 1909), A note on the etiology of ‘tabardillo,’ the typhus fever of Mexico. Public Health Reports, Washington, XXIV. 1941. Also in Collected Studies on Typhus, Hyg. Lab.— Bull., No. 86 (Oct. 1912), pp. 11–12. Treas. Dept. U.S.P.H. Service, Washington. D.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. F. and Goldberger, J. (18. 02. 1910), On the infeotivity of tabardillo or Mexican typhus for monkeys and studies on its mode of transmission. Public Health Reports, Washington, xxv. 177–185. Also in Collected Studies on Typhus, Hyg. Lab.—Bull., No. 86 (Oct. 1912), pp. 13–24. Treas. Dept. U.S.P.H. Service, Washington. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. F. and Goldberger, J. (2. 02. 1912), The relation of so-called Brill's disease to typhus fever. An experimental demonstration of their identity. Publ. Health Reports, Washington, XXVII. 149–160, 6 Charts. Also in Collected Studies on Typhus, Hyg. Lab.—Bull., No. 86 (Oct. 1912), pp. 25–35. Treas. Dept. U.S.P.H. Service, Washington. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. F. and Goldberger, J. (10. 1912), Studies on immunity and means of transmission of typhus. (Included in Collected Studies on Typhus), Hyg. Lab.—Bull., No. 86, pp. 81–138. Treas. Dept. U.S.P.H. Service, Washington. D.Google Scholar

Andree, J. (1812), A case of morbus pedicularis. N. Med. and Phys. Journ., London, III. 210–212. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar

Anonymous (1915), Ungezieferplage und Ungezieferbekämpfung. Eine Zusam-menstellung der angegebenen Methoden zur Vernichtung des Ungeziefers mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Vernichtung der Kleiderläuse. Deutscher Verlag für Volkswohlfahrt. Dresden. [Cited by Heymann 18. VIII. 1915, p. 300; and by Hase 29. xi. 1915. Inaccessible.] K.Google Scholar

Anonymous (09. 1915), The danger of disease from flies and lice. British Museum (Nat. Hist.) Economic Leaflets, No. 1, 4 pp. [Lice, pp. 3–4. Popular.] P.Google Scholar

Artault de Vevey, S. (26. 10. 1895), Deux cas de pédiculose accidentelle et intermittente chez l'homme. C.R. Soc. de Biol., 10th ser., II. 684–5. [Report on two cases of infestation with Pedicinus breviceps in persons who kept monkeys.] R.Google Scholar

Aubert, (1879), Les poux et les écoles. Un point d'hygiène scolaire. Lyon. [Rev. in Ann. de Dermatol., 1880, 2 ser., I. 292. Cited by Nuttall, 1899, p. 36.] D.Google Scholar

Axenfeld, T. (1. 04. 1915), Ist Naphthalinabwehr der Läuseplage für das Sehorgan bedenklich? Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 396. K.Google Scholar

Bacot, A. (1914), Diseases carried by insects. Journ. R. San. Inst., XXXV. 26–34. G.Google Scholar

Bacot, A. (29. 01. 1916), The temperature necessary for the destruction of lice and their eggs. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 167. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacot, A. (3. 06. 1916), Notes on Pediculus humanus (vestimenti) and Pediculus capitis. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 788–9. [Abstract of Bacbt 26. II. 1917, q.v.] B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacot, A. (30. 09. 1916), The use of insecticides against lice. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 447–450, 2 Figs. K.Google Scholar

Bacot, A. (26. 02. 1917). A contribution to the bionomics of Pediculus humanus (vestimenti) and Pediculus capitis. Parasitology, IX. 228–258, 4 Figs. B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacot, A. (04. 1917), The Louse Problem. Proc. Royal Soc. Med., London, X. 61–94. Also [abstract] in Brit. Med. Journ., 3. III. 1917, I. 296–7 [paper read 23. II. 17]. B.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baehr, G., Plotz, H. and Olitsky, P. K. (1915), The etiology of typhus exanthematicus. in. Experimental studies. Proc. N.Y. Pathol. Soc., n.s., XV. 53–62. [Abstract of paper to appear in Journ. Infect. Dis. Regard ‘Bacillus typhi exanihematicus’ as the cause of typhus. No mention of lice.] D.Google Scholar

Balfour, A. (1911), The spirochaete of Egyptian relapsing fever. Is it a specific entity? 4th Report Wellcome Trop. Res. Laboratories at the Gordon Mem. Coll. Khartoum, Vol. A—Medical, pp. 68–75, 1 Fig. D.Google Scholar

Balfour, A. (19. 06. 1915), Typhus fever, lice and the war; a suggestive fact. Lancet, I. 1311. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balfour, A. (17. 05. 1916), The Medical Entomology of Salonica. 25 pp., 31 Figs. London: Wellcome Bureau, [p. 21 lice merely mentioned. Illustrations after Terzi. Nothing original.] O.Google Scholar

Barbut, J. (1781), The Genera Insectorum of Linnaeus exemplified by various specimens of English Insects, drawn from Nature. London. 1 vol 4°. [PL 18, gen. 4, P. humanus; cited by Stephens, 1829.] I.Google Scholar

Barrie, H. G. (25. 09. 1915), Prevention of Typhus. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 492. [A letter to Ed.] K.Google Scholar

Bass, R. (4. 07. 1916), Neue Vorrichtungen zur feldmässigen Desinfektion. München. med. Wochenschr., No. 27. [Abstr. in Bull. Inst. Pasteur, XIV. 744.] K.Google Scholar

Belt, T. (1874), The Naturalist in Nicaragua. London: John Murray. 403 pp. [p. 210 casual reference to Pediculi as abounding on savage and semi-civilized peoples, without mention of country.] O.Google Scholar

Beneden, P. J. van (1889), Animal Parasites and Messmates. 4th ed. 83 Figs. 274 pp. London: Kegan Paul and Trench and Co. (Internat. Sci. Series). [Lice, see pp. 124–126, Figs. 17, 18. Text and Figs, very poor.] O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benenati, U. (1905), La malattia di Addison e la pidocchiara. Gazz. d. osp., Milano, XXVI. 389–392. [This is probably the same reference as one given by Editorial 29. VII. 1905: Gazz. d. Osp. e d. Cliniche, 26. III. 1905, wherein Benenati is quoted as citing old authors.] [I.M.] D.H.Google Scholar

Berkenhout, J. (1789), Synopsis of the Natural History of Great Britain and Ireland, being a second ed. of the Outlines, etc. London. 2 vols. 8°. [Vol. I. 170, P. humanus, Ph. pubis; cited by Stephens, 1829.] G.Google Scholar

Bertarelli, E. (1915), La profilassi negli ospedali succursali improvvisati. Morgagni, Milan, LVII. pt. 2, 985–9. [I.M.] K.Google Scholar

Bertarelli, E. (04. 1915), La lotta contro il tifo esantematico. Morgagni, Milan, LVII. 343–8. [Description of typhus epidemic and results of preventive measures in Tunis. Abstr. in Rev. Appl. Ent., IV., ser. B, 153.] D.K.Google Scholar

Bertarelli, E. (02. 1916), Gli insegnamenti della lotta profilattica contro il tifo esaiitematico. Morgagni, Milan, LVII. 145–156. [Summary of methods used against lice in various countries, including Italy. Abstract in Rev. Appl. Ent., IV., ser. B, 153.] K.Google Scholar

Bertarelli, E. (07. 1916), I punti controversi della epidemiologia del tifo esantematico. Morgagni, Milan, LVII. 585–591. [Discusses epidemiology and louse transmission. Abstr. in Rev. Appl. Ent., iv., ser. B, 153.] D.Google Scholar

Bertin, (1906), Phtiriase. Echo méd. du nord, Lille, X. 391–4. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar

BertuluS, E. (1871), Communication sur un cas de phthiriasis critique. Marseille Méd., VIII. 334–344. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Beyer, H. G. (05. 1916), On the etiology of typhus fever and louse extermination, from the view point of the sanitarian. Milit. Surgeon, Washington, D.C., XXXVIII. 483–491, 4 Pls. [A condensed summary. Abstr. in Rev. Appl. Ent., IV., ser. B, 135.] D.K.Google Scholar

Bingley, W. (1813), Animal Biography, or Popular Zoology. London. 4th ed. 3 vols. 8°. [III. 345, P. humanus; cited by Stephens, 1829.] G.Google Scholar

Birt, C. (11. 1912), Typhus fever. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, XIX. 521–530. [A useful summary.] D.Google Scholar

Bisset, E. (19–27. 01. 1914), Relapsing fever in the Meerut Division. Proc. 3rd All-India Sanit. Conference, Lucknow, IV. 114–9, Supplt. to Ind. Journ. Med. Res. D.Google Scholar

Blair, J. (1863), On an unusual case of phthiriasis. Austral. Med. Journ., Melbourne, VIII. 174. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Blanchard, M. (01.–02. 1914), Epidémie de fièvre récurrente à Bikié. Ann. Hyg. Méd. Coloniale, Paris, XVII. 81–86; abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., London, ser. B, II. 79. [Relapsing fever in French Congo, accounted for by Ornithodorus moubata, evidence excluding lice as carriers of Spiro-chaeta duttoni.] D.Google Scholar

Blanchard, R. (1890), Traité de Zoologie médicale. Paris: Baillière et Fils. 2 vols. [Human lice, pp. 435–446; Text-figs. 672–682, poor.] G.Google Scholar

Blaschko, A. (1. 01. 1915), Zur Prophylaxe des Flecktyphus. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 12. [A few lines only.] D.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaschko, A. (18. 02. 1915), Zur Bekämpfung der Läuseplage. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 228. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleicher, P. (1882), Pediculus pubis (Phthirius inguinalis) in. den Cilien kleiner Kinder. Wien. med. Wochenschr., XXXII. 976–7. Ph.Google Scholar

Bleykaerts, (1875), Observation d'un aecès de fièvre pédiculaire aiguë. Presse méd. belge, Brussels, XXVII. 5. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar

Blumberg, (25. 07. 1915), Ueber Massenentlausung und Desinfektion von Gefangenenlagern durch Lokomobilen. Med. Klin., Berlin, XI. 837–9. K.Google Scholar

Bodin, E. (1912–1913), Traitement des phtiriases. Paris méd. IX. 333–336. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar

Bodkin, G. E. and Cleare, L. D. (10. 1916), Notes on some animal parasites in British Guiana. Bull. Entomol. Res., London, VII. 179–190, 3 Figs., 1 Map. [Head-lice on negroes, East Indians, etc.; body-lice only on East Indians; Ph. pubis on all races.] Geo.Google Scholar

Bohne, (1915), Stubenfliegen als Träger von Läusen. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 358. [I.M.] B.Google Scholar

Boral, H. (17. 05. 1915), Zur Differentialdiagnostik und Prophylaxe des Flecktyphus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 24, 641–645. D.K.Google Scholar

Bordas, F. (20. 07. 1915), Désinfection des trains sanitaires dans le camp retranché de Paris. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 727–740, 3 Figs. [Includes destruction of vermin by SO₂ and vapourised.benzine.] K.Google Scholar

Bordas, F. (20. 03. 1916), Désinfection rapide par la chaleur. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVIII. 275–282, 5 Figs. K.Google Scholar

Bordas, and Bruère, S. (20. 06. 1915), Efficacité comparée de la benzine et de l'anisol pour la destruction des parasites. Rev. d'hyg. et de police sanit., Paris, XXXVII. 628–633. K.Google Scholar

Borne, G. (20. 11.–12. 1914), Prophylaxie et Destruction des parasites de l'homme. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVI. 955–966. K.Google Scholar

Börner, C. (1904), Zur Systematik der Hexapoden. Zool. Anzeiger, XXVII. 511–533. S.Google Scholar

Bousfield, L. (1911), Notes on human spirochaetosis. 4th Report Wettcome Trap. Res. Laboratories at the Gordon Mem. Coll. Khartoum, Vol. A— Medical, pp. 62–67, 7 temp. Charts. [Merely suspected that P. vestimenti served as vectors.] D.Google Scholar

Bowerbank, J. S. (10. 1873), On the brain and a portion of the nervous system of Pediculus capitis. Entomologist, VI. 489–497. A.Google Scholar

Brauer, A. (6. 05. 1915), Ueber die Unzulänglichkeit der bisherigen Entlau-sungsverfahren. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI., No. 19, 561–2. B.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brault, J. (1906), Quelques cas de phtiriases anormales. Bull. soc. franç, de dermatol. et syph., Paris, xvii. 37–40; also Ann. de Derm, et de Syph., 4 s., VII. 70–73. Ph.Google Scholar

Brault, J. and Montpellier, J. (8. 01. 1914), Infestation du cuir ohevelu de l'adulte par le phtirius pubis. Bull. soc. franç, de dermal, et syph., Paris, XXV. 78–80; also Gaz. d. hôp., Paris, LXXXVII. 261. Ph.Google Scholar

Brault, J. and Montpellier, J. (1914), Nouveau cas d'infestation du cuir chevelu de l'adulte par le Phtirius pubis. Gaz. d. hôp., LXXXVII. 805; also Bull. soc. franç. de dermatol. et syph., XXV. 206. Ph.Google Scholar

Braun, (1851), Conjecturen ueber Phthiriasis. Rhein. Monatschr. f. prakt. Aerzte, Köln, V. 677. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Braun, M. (1906), The Animal Parasites of Man. 3rd ed., transl. by Falcke, P., with additions by Sambon, L. W. and Theobald, F. V.. London: J. Bale, Sons and Danielsson, Ltd. XIX + 453 pp., 294 Figs. [pp. 394–6, Figs. 251–255, Pediculus capitis, P. vestimenti, Phthirius inguinalis, poor. It is stated of the last that it ‘reproduces more rapidly than other lice, and is communicated much more freely’ and that the nits are laid singly on ‘hairs near their apex’ (!) (the Fig. is taken from Leuckart without acknowledgement).] G.Google Scholar

Braun, M. and Lühe, M. (1910), A Handbook of Practical Parasitology. Transl. by Forster, L.. London: John Bale, Sons and Danielsson, Ltd. VIII + 208 pp., 100 Figs. [pp. 185–187, Figs. 96–97 as in Braun, 1906; brief and inadequate description.] G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brill, N. E. (08. 1911), Pathological and experimental data derived from a further study of an acute infectious disease of unknown origin. American Journ. Med. Sci., CXLII. 196–218. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brühl, (1871), Zur feineren Anatomie der an Menschen schmarotzenden Läuse. Wien. med. Wochenschr., XXI. 475–9, 501–6, 1 Fig. A.Google Scholar

Brumpt, E. (1910), Précis de Parasitologie. Paris: Masson & Cie. 915 pp., 683 Figs. [Pediculi, pp. 548–555, Figs. 395–8.] G.Google Scholar

Brunton, Sir L. (6. 02. 1915), Lice and rheumatism amongst soldiers. Lancet, CLXXXIII. 298. D.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryant, (15. 01. 1838), Morbus pedicularis. Lancet, XXXII. 614. [Reports a case of intense infestation with P. humanus, aggravated by scratching.] D.Google Scholar

Bujwid, O. (9. 05. 1915), see Editorial (same date).Google Scholar

Bulkley, L. D. (1881), Phthiriasis. Arch. Dermatol., New York, VII. 394–403. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Bulloch, W. and Douglas, S. R. (1909), see Allbutt and Rolleston.Google Scholar

Bureau, M. and Bureau, G. (1907), Un cas de melanodermie phtiriasique avec pigmentation de la muqueuse buccale. Gaz. Méd. de Nantes, 2 s., XXV. 292–7. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar

Burmeister, (1839), Handb. der Entomologie Berlin, II., Abt. 2. [Cited by Pawlowsky, 1906, p. 157, as giving Nitzsch's description of mouthparts in Pediculus.] A.Google Scholar

Burmeister, H. (1847), Ueber die Mundbildung yon Pediculus. Linnaea Entomologia, II. 569–591. A.Google Scholar

Busson, B. (24. 06. 1915), Zur Frage der Entlausung im Felde. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 674–678. K.Google Scholar

Calandruccio, S. (1890), Animali parassiti dell' uomo in Sicilia. Atti Accad. Gioenia di sci. nut. in Catania, Ann. 66, 4 s. Vol. II. pp. 95–135. [Brief reference to fly carriage of lice, p. 135.]Google Scholar

Campana, (1913), Eritrema ardesiaca da ftirii. Clinica dermosifilopat. d. R. Univ. di Roma, XXXI. 81. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar

Cantrell, J. A. (1889–1890), Pediculosis capillitii. Ann. Gynaec. and Paediatr., Philadelphia, III. 485–7. [I.M.] D.K.Google Scholar

Cantrell, J. A. (1900), Hospital treatment of pediculosis. Phila. Hosp. Rep., IV. 261–3. [I.M.] K.Google Scholar

Carter, W. T. (1872), Phthiriasis and its treatment. Amer. Pract., Louisville, VI. 211–213. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Casaux, J. (04. 1914), Considérations épidémiologiques concernant la fièvre récurrente au Tonkin. Bull. Soc. Méd. Chir. de l'Indo-Chine, Hanoi, V 142–150. [Abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., ser. B, II. 170. Relapsing fever probably endemic; prevails in winter when natives confined to their huts; lice probable carriers.] D.Google Scholar

Castellani, A. and Chalmers, A. J. (1913), Manual of Tropical Medicine. London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox. 2nd ed., xxxii + 1747 pp., 630 Figs., 15 coloured Pis. [pp. 631–4, Figs. 267–271, Pediculus humanus, P. corporis, Phthirius pubis; pp. 1578–1580, 1628 pediculosis.] G.Google Scholar

Castellani, A. and Jackson, T. W. (15. 11. 1915), Notes on certain insecticides. Journ. of Trop. Med. and Hyg., XVIII. 253–5. [Tested insecticides on lice, bugs and fleas.] K.Google Scholar

Cazals, (1807), Observation sur un cas de fièvre intermittente phthiriasique avec sympathie d'organes qui n'ont entr'eux aucun rapport sensible. Journ. gén. de méd. chir. et pharm., Paris, xxx. 169–177. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Cenni, (1839), Su la ftiriasi e il tremore mercuriale. Bull. d. sc. med. di Bologna, 2 s., VII. 354–7. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Charmeil, (1905), Phtiriase généralisée. Nord méd., Lille, xi. 68. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar

Chatin, (1880), Etudes analytiques sur le rostre des Anoplures. Bull. Soc. Philom. (7), iv. 59 and 60. [Cited by Enderlein, 1905, p. 634, regarding homologies of mouthparts.] A.Google Scholar

Chesney, L. M. (05. 1916), Typhus work in Serbia. Practitioner, London, XCVI. 542–550. [Thinks it ‘highly doubtful’ that lice are the only carriers but gives no evidence for her statement. Lice were very prevalent in the midst of the severe epidemic and she used sulphur and naphthalene to keep off lice.] D.K.Google Scholar

Chivaud, (1803), Mémoire sur la phthiriasis, ou maladie pédiculaire. Ann. Soc. de méd.-prat. de Montpel, II. 216–230. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Cholodkowsky, N. (1903), Zur Morphologie der Pediculiden. Zool. Anzeiger, XXVII. 120–5, 6 Figs. A.I.Google Scholar

Cholodkowsky, N. (1904), Zur Kenntnis der Mundwerkzeuge und Systematik der Pediculiden. Zool. Anzeiger, XXVIII. 368–370, 1 Fig. A.Google Scholar

Cholodkowsky, N. (1905), Noch ein Wort über die Mundteile der Pediculiden. Zool. Anzeiger, XXIX. 149. [Merely controversy with Enderlein.] A.Google Scholar

Ciavaldini, (13. 07. 1915), Relation d'une épidémie de typhus exanthématique (III.–IV. 1915). Bull. Acad. de Méd., Paris, 3 s., LXXIV. 63–64; also Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 725–6. [Short account of outbreaks of typhus in Algeria.] D.Google Scholar

Clairville, J. (1798–1806), Entomologie Helvétique, ou Catalogue des Insectes de la Suisse rangés d'après une nouvelle méthode. Zurich. 2 vols. 8°. [Cited re Pediculus by Denny, 1842; reference found in Stephens, 1829.] S.Google Scholar

Clemow, F. G. (1903), The Geography of Disease. Cambridge: University Press. [Relapsing fever, pp. 364–370. Typhus, pp. 495–508.] D.Google Scholar

Clerc, M. (20. 08. 1915). Prophylaxie du typhus exanthématique. Rev. d'hygiène, Paris, XXXVII. 780–4. K.Google Scholar

Copeman, S. M. (6. 02. 1915), Note on a successful method for the extermination of vermin infesting troops. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 247–8. [Also appeared in the Lancet; same date.] K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corbett, C. H. (22. 05. 1915), Typhus fever in Palestine 1913–14. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 887–888. [Chiefly clinical. Casual mention of lice.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corlette, C. E. (6. 05. 1916), The destruction of lice, bugs, and other insect pests, by hydrocyanic acid fumigation. Med. Journ. Australia, Sydney, 3rd Year, I. 391. [Abstr. in Rev. Appl. Ent., IV., ser. B, 135.] K.Google Scholar

Correspondent (21. 09. 1901), A child killed by lice. Lancet, II. 819. D.Google Scholar

Correspondent (14. 05. 1904), An unsuspected source of an objectionable parasite. Lancet, I. 1396. [Lice on child's head supposedly derived from contents of sparrows' nests washed into receptacle whence rain water was taken for washing child's head (! ).]Google Scholar

Crüger, D. (1705), De tumore cum pedieulis. Misc. Acad. nat. curios., 1685, Norimberg, decuria 2, IV. 40; also transl. Collect, acad. d. mém., etc., Dijon, 1755, III. 653. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar

Cuiffo, G. (6. 07. 1907), Intorno alia patogenesi delle cosi dette macchie cerulee. Boll. Soc. Med.-Chir. Pavia, XXI. 260–5. [Cited by Tièche, 1908.] Ph.Google Scholar

Cummings, B. F. (1915), The louse and its relation to disease. Its life-history and habits and how to deal with it. British Museum (Nat. Hist.) Economic Series, No. 2, 16 pp., 4 Figs. P.S.Google Scholar

Cummings, B. F. (03. 1916), Studies on the Anoplura and Mallophaga, being a report upon a collection from the mammals and birds in the [Zoological] Society's Gardens. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1916, pp. 253–295, 24 Text-figs. R.S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curschmann, P. (22. 07. 1915), Zur Vertilgung der Läuse im Felde. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 891–2. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalla, Torre K. W. (1908), ‘Anoplura’ in Genera Insectorum (Dirigés par P. Wystman, Bruxelles), Fasc. 81, 22 pp., 10 Figs. S.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles (1880), The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: Appleton. [Pediculus, pp. 169–170. Refers to Murray's paper (1861, q.v.) and adds: ‘The surgeon of a whaling ship in the Pacific assured me that when Pediculi, with which some Sandwich Islanders on board swarmed, strayed on to the bodies of the English sailors, they died in the course of three or four days. These Pediculi were darker coloured, and appeared different from those proper to the natives of Chiloe, in South America, of which he gave me specimens. These again appeared larger and much softer than European lice.’]Google Scholar

Davies, F. C. and Weldon, R. P. (3. 02. 1917), A preliminary contribution on ‘P.U.O.’ (Trench Fever). Lancet, I. 183–4. Also [Abstract] in Journ. Trop. Med. and Hyg., xx. 70–71. [Report a single experiment indicating that P. hummanus may convey trench fever. Must be regarded as doubtful pending confirmation with adequate control experiments.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davison, H. E. (26. 06. 1915), Destruction of lice and other body vermin. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 1103. [Letter, asks for information.] K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davy, P. C. T. (11. 12. 1915), Typhus fever and lice. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 875–6. [Typhus convalescents when reinfested with lice may infect lice and so spread typhus. Merely a letter and a supposition.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delaporte, (1821), Observation sur un cas de phthiriasis. Journ. gén. de méd., chir. et pharm., Paris, LXXVI. 178–183. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Deléarde, and d'Halluin, (20. 04. 1916), A propos d'une épidémie de typhus exanthématique observée en Allemagne (d'avril à juin 1915). Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVIII. 310–320. D.Google Scholar

Delta, C. G. (1915), Sur la destruction des poux dans les épidémies de typhus exanthématique. Presse méd., Paris, XXIII. 175. [I.M.] K.Google Scholar

Demsar, (11. 05. 1915), Aus der Feldpraxis. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 671. K.Google Scholar

Denny, H. (1842), Monographic, Anoplurorum Britanniae. London: H. G. Bohn. 8°, xxiv + 262 pp., 26 coloured Pls. [pp. 8–23, Phthirius inguinalis, Pediculus capitis, P. vestimenti and P. tabescentium, PI. XXVI., Figs. 1–3; cites old systematic literature.] S.Google Scholar

Desmons, B. (1901), Le traitement de la phtiriase. Ann. de thérap. dermatol. et syph., Paris, I. 27–30. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar

Deutsch, (1850), Phthiriasis. Med. Ztg., Berlin, XIX. 249–252. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Dewèvre, (1892), Note sur le rô1e des pediculi dans la propagation de l'impetigo. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, No. 11, pp. 232–4. [Cit. by Nuttall, 1899, p. 36.] D.Google Scholar

Discussion (1871), Sur la phthiriase. Marseille méd., VIII. 367–372. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Doane, R. W. (1913), An annotated list of the literature on insects and disease for the year 1912. Journ. Econ. Entomol., Concord, VI. 366–385. O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dore, N. A. (29. 04. 1916). [Lice, Abstract of paper read at a meeting of the 3rd Corps Med. Soc.] Brit. Med. Journ., I. 630. K.Google Scholar

Duguet, (1880), Sur les taches bleues; leur production artiflcielle et leur valeur séméiologique. Ann. de Dermatol. et de Syphil., X. 545. Ph.Google Scholar

Duguet, (17. 04. 1880), Les taches bleues et le pou de pubis. C. R. Soc. de Biol. Ph.Google Scholar

Duguet, (5. 02. 1881), Pathogénie des taches bleues. C. R. Soc. de Biol. Ph.Google Scholar

Duguet, (1882), Expériences et recherches nouvelles sur les taches bleues. C. R. Soc. de Biol., p. 617. [Cited by Blanchard, 1890, p. 446.] Ph.Google Scholar

Duhring, L. A. (1871), Phthiriasis and localized eczema. Philadelphia Med. Times, II. 88. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Duplantier, P. (1907), Contribution à I'étude de la pigmentation des muqueuses dans la mélanodermie phtiriasique. Paris, 8°, 54 pp. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar

Dürr, G. E. F. (1840), Beobachtungen und Bemerkungen über die Läusekrankheit. Journ. d. prakt. Heilk., Berlin, XC. 79–94. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar

Dyer, D. (1897), A case of universal pediculosis pubis; purpura hemorrhagica a complication. Am. Journ. Dermatol. and Genito-Urin. Dis., St. Louis, I. 23. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar

Eckert, E. (22. 04. and 26. 08. 1915), Ein neues Entlausungsverfahren. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 419–420, 918–920, 4 Figs. K.Google Scholar

Editorial (4. 12. 1869), Pedicularia. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 612–3. G.Google Scholar

Editorial (29. 07. 1905), ‘Fatal’ pediculosis and Addison's disease. New York Med. Journ., LXXXII. 234. D.H.Google Scholar

Editorial (13. 11. 1909), Lice and liberty. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 1427. G.Google Scholar

Editorial (17. 10. 1914), The plague of lice in the Crimea. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 679. [Abstract and comments on an article in Guy's Hosp. Gaz. for 10. x. 1914 containing letters of Sir Thomas Longmore written in 1855 and describing the sufferings of soldiers in the trenches.] D.Google Scholar

Editorial (28. 02. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Kriegsseuchen. Med. Klinik, Berlin, XI. 263–4. D.K.Google Scholar

Editorial (9. 05. 1915), Umfrage über Uebertragung und Verhütung des Flecktyphus. Med. Klinik, Berlin, XI. (19), 531–3. [Communications received from Flügge, Gärtner, Bujwid, Kisskalt and Uhlenhuth.] D.K.Google Scholar

Editorial (12. 06. 1915). [The spread of typhus by lice.] Lancet, CLXXXVIII. 1251. G.K.Google Scholar

Editorial (11. 1915). [‘Campaign jelly’ for the control of insect parasites of man.] CaaOBOai. [The Horticulturist], Rostov-on-Don, No. 11, p. 854. Rev. in Rev. of Appl. Entomol., ser. B, IV. 25. K.Google Scholar

Ekman, K. (1852), Phthiriasis. Förk. v. Svens. Läk.-Sällsk. Sammank. 1851–2, Stockholm, 26–28. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Emerson, C. P. (1906), A case of combined morbus errorum and Addison's disease. Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull., XVII. 238. [P. corporis present.] D.Google Scholar

Enderlein, (1904), Ueber die Morphologie, Klassiflkation und systematische Stellung der Anopluren. Zool. Anz., XXVIII. 121–147, 15 Figs. [Figs. 2, 10, 11P. vestimenti, Ph. pubis.] A.I.S.Google Scholar

Enderlein, (1905), Zur Morphologie des Läusekopfes. Zool. Anz., XXVIII. 626–636, 5 Figs. A.Google Scholar

Engelhardt, V. M. (28. 11. 1915), L'influenee sur la vitalité des poux adultes de la température, de la sécheresse de l'air et d'étoffes impregnées de différentes matières. [Russian.] Bull. Soc. Entomol. Moscou, I. 164–170. K.Google Scholar

Eysell, A. (1913), ‘Die Läuse’ in Mense's Handb. der Tropenkr., 2nd ed., I. 40–52. [A short account of Pediculi; compiled.] G.Google Scholar

Eysell, A. (03. 1915), Ein einfaches Vorbeugungsmittel gegen Verlausung und deren Folgen. Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Trop.-Hyg., XIX. 170–1. Also München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. No. 16. K.Google Scholar

Eysell, A. (8. 04. 1915), Nachtrag zu ‘Ein einfaches Vorbeugungsmittel gegen Verlausung und ihre Folgen.’. Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Tropen-Hyg., Leipzig, XIX. 238–240. K.Google Scholar

Fabre, S. P. (1879), De la mélanodermie phthiriasique. Soc. d. sc. méd. de Gannat. Compt. Rend., Paris, XXXIII. 47–54. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Fabre, P. (1902), Sur les mélanodermies phthiriasiques. Rev. gén. de clin. et de thérap., Paris, XVI. 179–183. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J. C. (1775), Syst. Entomologiae. Flensburgi et Lipsiae. [Pediculus, pp. 804–805.] S.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J. C. (1794), Entomologia systematica, etc. Hafniae. [Pediculus, vol. IV. pp. 417–418; the same as Fabricius, 1775.] S.Google Scholar

Fantham, H. B. (14. 02. 1912), Herpetomonas pediculi n.sp. parasitic in the alimentary canal of Pediculus vestimenti, the human body louse. Proc. Roy. Soc., ser. B, LXXXIV. 505–517, col. PL 14. B.E.Google Scholar

Farrar, R. (1910), Report on the manufacture and sale of unwashed rag-flock. Reports Local Govt. Board on Public Health and Med. Subjects, London, n.s., No. 27, pp. 3–23. [p. 11, P. vestimenti and nits pass alive through tearing machine.] G.Google Scholar

Fasal, H. (22. 02. 1915), Die Pediculosisfrage. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 8, 225–7.Google Scholar

Felix, A. (17. 07. 1915), Zur Methode der Läusevertilgung durch Dämpfe chemischer Agentien. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 24, 647–8. K.Google Scholar

Fiebiger, J. (23. 04. 1915). [Morphologie der Kleiderlaus.] Sitzung d. K. K. Gesellsch. f. Aerate, Wien. Abstract in Med. Klin., Berlin, XI. 657. A.Google Scholar

Fiebiger, J. (17. 07. 1915), Ueber Kleiderläuse und die Uebertragung von Krank-heiten durch Arthropoden. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 24, 645–7. A.B.D.Google Scholar

Filippini, A. (30. 04. 1916), Tossicità della benzina usata quale pediculicida. Ann. d' Igiene, Rome, XXVI. 268–9. K.Google Scholar

Fischer, I. (25. 03. 1915), Zur Geschichte des Flecktyphus. (Flecktyphus und Pedikulosis.) Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 12, 321–2. [History of typhus from 16th century onwards, prevalence of lice recorded by Corbems. Old prophylactics against typhus, such as placing mint, rosemary, marjoram etc. in bedding or using garlic and camphor— really served to repel lice.] D.H.K.Google Scholar

Fischer, W. (1910), Ueber die Phtiriasis der Cilien und des Kopfhaares. Monatsh. f. prakt. Dermatol., Hamburg and Leipzig, L. 115–8. Ph.Google Scholar

Fletcher, T. B. (1914), Some South Indian Insects and other animals of importance considered especially from an economic point of view. Madras: Govt. Press, XXII + 565 pp., 50 Pis. and 440 Text-figs, [pp. 521–524, Figs. 412–413, Pediculi affecting man.] G.Google Scholar

Flügge, C. (9. 05. 1915), see Editorial (same date).Google Scholar

Flügge, C. (1915), Schutzkleid bei Fleckfieber. Med. Klinik, No. 15. [Cited by Heymann, 18. VIII. 1915, p. 321; abstract in Deutsche med. Wochenschrift, 1915, p. 572.] K.Google Scholar

Font-Réaulx, P. de (1912), Une maladie des yeux causée par les poux. Arch. de Parasitol., XV. 385–397. [P. capitis regarded as cause.] D.Google Scholar

Forestus, P. (1619), Observationum et curationum medicinalium et chirurgicarum, etc., libri III. Fol. Francoforti, 476 pp. [s.]Google Scholar

Fournier, A. (1891), De la phthiriase pubienne. Union méd., Paris, 3rd s., LI. 293–7; also Gaz. d. hôp. de Toulouse, v. 81; also (abstract) Journ. d. mal. cutan. et syph., III. 125–8. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Fox, T. (1869), Prurigo and pediculosis, or phthiriasis, and the connection with pediculi. St Andrew's Med. Grad. Assoc. Tr., London, 1870, XXXIII. 213–230. [I.C.] D.Ph.Google Scholar

Fox, T. (1872), Note on a diagnostic sign of phthiriasis. Am. Journ. Syph. and Dermatol., New York, III. 1–4. [I.C.] D.Ph.Google Scholar

Fox, T. (1873), The diagnostic sign of phthiriasis. Lancet, II. 902. [I.C.] D.Ph.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fränkel, S. (25. 03. 1915), Ueber ein neues sehr wirksames Mittel gegen die Kleiderlaus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 12, 313–4. K.Google Scholar

Fränkel, S. (8. 04. 1915), Weitere Mitteilungen über läusetötende Mittel. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 371. K.Google Scholar

Fränkel, S. (06. 1915), Ueber die Kleiderlaus tötende Mittel. Therap. Monatsh., Berlin, XXIX. 301–7. K.Google Scholar

Frank de Frankenau, G. (1678), Dissertatio de Phtiriasi morbo pediculari, quo nonnulli imperatores, reges, aliique illustres viri ac foeminae misere interierunt. Heidelberg. [M.] Ph.Google Scholar

Frauenholz, (1912), Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Anopluren. Jahresber. d. Niedersächs. Zoolog. Ver. zu Hannover. Reprint pp. 1–60, Pis. I.–III. [Cited by Miiller, 1915, p. 48 as first having described chaetotaxy in different stages of development of P. capitis.] A.Google Scholar

Frazer, W. (16. 12. 1885), Pediculi; their treatment by parasiticides; with observations. Med. Press and Circ., London, n.s., XL. 550–1. K.Google Scholar

Friedmann, A. (31. 01. 1916), Beiträge zur Bekämpfung der Kleiderläuse in Kleidern. Centralbl. f. Bakt. u. Parasitenk., I. Abt., Orig., LXXVII. 320–338, 4 Figs. K.B.Google Scholar

Frickhinger, H. W. (12. 10. 1916), Ueber das Geruchsvermögen der Kleiderlaus. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLII. 1254–1256. [Announces fuller paper will appear in Zeitschr. f. angew. Entomol., III. Heft 2, 1916, but gives his main results.] B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frisch, J. (8. 04. 1915), Zur Verhütung der Infektion mit Flecktyphus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 367–8. K.Google Scholar

Froggatt, W. W. (no date given), Australian Insects. Sydney: Wm Brooks and Co., Ltd. XIV + 449 pp., 37 Pis. and 180 Text-figs, [p. 388, briefest reference only.] O.Google Scholar

Galaine, C. and Houlbert, C. (6. 03. 1916), Sur le self-diffuseur à anhydride sulfureux pour la désinsectation et la dératisation des tranchées, des cales de navires et des locaux habités. C.R. Acad. Sci., CLXII. 363–5. K.Google Scholar

Galewsky, (4. 03. 1915), Zur Behandlung und Prophylaxe der Kleiderläuse. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 285–286. K.Google Scholar

Galewsky, (27. 05. 1915), Vorschläge zur Entlausung von Gefangenenlagern. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 652–3. K.Google Scholar

Galli-Valerio, B. (3. 07. 1913), Notes de parasitologie, etc. Centralbl. f. Bakt., etc., I. Abt., Orig., LXIX. 496–504. [p. 501 a few lines on survival of lice unfed.] B.Google Scholar

Galli-Valerio, B. (9. 05. 1916), Neue Beiträge zur Biologie und zur Bekämpfung der Kleiderläuse. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. u. Parasitenk., I. Abt., Orig., LXXVIII. 37–43, 5 Figs. [The author refers to two earlier papers, Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. u. Parasitenk., 1914, LXXV. 45 and 1915, LXXVI. 511 which are at present inaccessible.] B.K.Google Scholar

Gärtner, A. (9. 05. 1915), see Editorial (same date).Google Scholar

Gaucher, (1900), La phthiriase. Méd. orient., Paris, IV. 453–6. Also Nice méd., XXV. 33–7. Also (abstract) Indépend. méd., Paris, VI. 377. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Gaud, T. (9. 03. 1916), Nouvelle forme d'emploi du formol pour les désin-fections aux armées. C.R. Acad. Sc., rev. in Rev. d'Hyg., XXXVIII. 441–3. K.Google Scholar

Gaulke, (1863), Ueber Läuse und Läusesucht (Phthiriasis) in therapeutischer und medicinal-polizeilicher Beziehung. Vierteljschr. f. gerichtl. u. öffentl. Med., Berlin, XXIII. 315–329. [I.C.] A.Ph.Google Scholar

Gaulke, (1866), Ueber die Läusesucht (Phthiriasis). Wien. med. Wochenschr., XVI. 380; 398. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Gaviño, A. and Girard, J. (1910), (No. 1) El tifo experimental en los monos inferiores. (No. 3) El tifo exantematico en los monos inferiores (Ateles vellerosus). Immunidad conferida por un primer ataquo. Resistencia del virus á la calefacción. Publications del Instituto Bacteriologico National, Mexico. 32 pp. D.Google Scholar

Geer, C. de (1778), Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire des insectes, VII. pp. iii-xii + 950, Pls. I.–XLIX. Stockholm, [pp. 62–67, Pl I., Figs. 6–10 (♀♀, penis, leg 1, head), P. humanus corporis and P. h. capitis; what relates to biology is cited from Leeuwenhoek.] A.I.S.Google Scholar

Geoffrey, (1764), Histoire Abrégée des Insectes, II. 596–7. Paris. [Pediculus humanus L. and P. inguinalis very brief treatment, cites older authors as do Linnaeus, de Geer, Latreille.] S.Google Scholar

Gerwin, (8. 06. 1915), Eine Schutzvorrichtung gegen Flecktyphus. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 802. [Places a wooden gutter in the¸ form of a frame on floor about beds of typhus patients or suspects; the gutter filled with cresol soap solution. This to prevent lice perambulating.] K.Google Scholar

Gibier, (5. 02. 1881), Nouvelle étude sur la corrélation qui existe entre les taches ombrées et la phthiriase du pubis; recherches cliniques. C.R. Soc. de Biol., 7th ser., III. 64–6. [Duguet refers to further experiments of his own in the discussion which follows Gibier's paper.] Ph.Google Scholar

Giebel, C. G. (1874), Insecta Epizoa. Die auf Säugethieren und Vögeln schmarotzenden Insekten nach Chr. L. Nitzsch's Nachlass. Leipzig: O. Wigand. Fol., xiv + 308 pp., 20 Pls. [pp. 23–27, Pl. I., Fig. 8 Phthirius inguinalis, pp. 27–32, Pl I., Figs. 1, 2, 5 Pediculus vestimenti and P. capitis. Systematic position and morphology.] A.S.Google Scholar

Giese, (14. 09. 1915), Ueber Reinigung der Lazarettzüge bei der Linienkom-mandatur × Stettin. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 1274–5, 1 Fig., Feldärztl. Beil., No. 37. [Railway carriage arranged as disinfector.] K.Google Scholar

Girard, M. (1885), Les Insectes. Traité élémentaire d'entomologie. Paris: Baillière et Fils. Vol. III. [Pediculus and Phthirus, pp. 1082–1085; Pl CXVII., Figs. 5–7, signed below E. Guérin p^l x^bre 1836.] G.I.Google Scholar

Girault, A. A. (10. 1912), Notes on Pediculus vestimenti Nietzsche, the body louse of man. Entomol. News, XXIII. 339–344. [Trivial, wordy contribution. Merely saw corporis hatch and feed the same day, and he kept a few alive 2–3 days.] B.Google Scholar

Goldberger, J. (1914), Typhus fever. A brief note on its prevention. U.S. Public Health Rep., XXIX. 1068–1073. [Brief account. Nothing original.] O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberger, J. and Anderson, J. F. (1. 03. 1912), The transmission of typhus fever, with especial reference to transmission by the head louse (Pediculus capitis). Public Health Reports, Washington, XXVII. 297–307, 6 Charts (Monkey temperatures). Also in Collected Studies on Typhus, Hyg. Lab. —Bull., No. 86, pp. 37–48 (Oct. 1912). Treas. Dept., U.S.P.H. Service, Washington. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldenberg, H. (1887), Ueber Pediculosis: Ein Beitrag zum Zusammenhang. zwischen Haut- und Augenkrankheiten. Berlin. klin. Wochenschr., XXIV. 866. D.Google Scholar

Gotschlich, (1915), Ueber Fleckfleber. Med. Klinik, No. 13. [Cited by Heymann, 18. 08. 1915, p. 321.] D.Google Scholar

Graber, V. (1872), Anatomiseh-physiologische Studien ueber Phthirius inguinalis Leach. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool, XXII. 137–167, Pl 11. [Important.] Ph.A.B.Google Scholar

Grandesso-Silvestri, O. (1865), Un caso di morbo pedicolare. Gazz. med. ital., prov. venete, Padova, VIII. 84–6. [i.c.] D.Google Scholar

Grandesso-Silvestri, O. (1871), Morbo pedicolare guarito colla cicutina. Gazz. med. ital., prov. venete, XIV. 320. [i.c.] D.Google Scholar

Granjux, (20. 04. 1915). (Discussion following paper by Nicolle and Conseil, 20. 02. 1915, pp. 172–203 q.v.) Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 430–2. [Disputes validity of statement that typhus and relapsing fevers are only transmitted by lice, but offers merely opinions as against experimental evidence.] D.Google Scholar

Grassi, B. (1881), Note intorno ad alcuni parassiti dell' uomo. Di una sede anomala di Phthirius inguinalis. Gazz. d. ospedali, Milano, II. 433. [Cited by Perroncito, 1881, and Blanchard, 1890, p. 446.] Ph.Google Scholar

Grellety, (1890), Considérations sur la pédiculose et son traitement. Actualité méd., Paris II. 161–7. [i.c.] D.K.Google Scholar

Grellety, (1890–1891), Traitement de la phthiriase. Journ. d. mal. cutan. et syph., Paris II. 20–2. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar

Greene, E. M. (20. 01. 1898), Pediculosis in Boston's Public Schools. Boston Med. and Surg. Journ., XXXVIII. 70–71. D.Google Scholar

Greenough, F. B. (1867–1868), Pediculi vestimentorum. Boston Med. and Surg. Journ., LXXVII. 241–6. [i.c.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenough, F. B. (1887), Clinical Notes on Pediculosis. Trans. Am. Dermatol. Assoc., Boston, pp. 17–21. Also Boston Med.'and Surg. Journ., CXVII. 469–474. [i.c.] D.Google Scholar

Grimm, O. A. v. (1870), Zur Embryologie von Phthirius pubis. 8°, St Petersburg. Also in Mélanges biol. Acad. Imp. Sci. St Pétersbourg, 1869–71, VII. 303–310, I Pl. [s.] Ph.Google Scholar

Grixoni, G. (30. 06. 1916), La difesa contro i pidocchi. Giorn. Med. Milit., Rome, LXIV. 417–430. [Abstract in Rev. Appl. Ent., IV., ser. B, 153, states this paper is a review.] K.Google Scholar

Gross, (23. 03. 1915). [Destruction of lice.] Neue freie Presse. [Cited by Swellengrebel, 1916, p. 25.] K.Google Scholar

Gross, J. (1906), Untersuchungen über die Ovarien von Mallophagen und Pediculiden. Zool. Jahrb., XXII. 347–386, Pls. XX., XXI. [Pl. XXI., Fig. 31 P. capitis, egg, structure of micropyle cap.] A.I.S.Google Scholar

Grube, A. E. (1851), ‘Parasiten’ in Middendorff, Reisen in den äussersten Norden u. Osten Sibiriens während der Jahre 1843 u. 1844, II., Pt. 1, pp. 469–503. [Cited by Piaget, 1880, p. 620, re P. capitis.] Geo.Google Scholar

Gruendler, O. (1850), Dissertatio de parasitis hominis, 55 pp., 2 Pls. 8°, Berlin. [s.] G.Google Scholar

Guérin-Méneville, F. E. (1829–1844), Iconographie du Règne animal de G. Cuvier. II. Planches des animaux invertébrés. Ins. Pl 2. [Coloured Figs. 5, 6, Pediculus humanus corporis and P. h. capitis. Fig. 7, P. pubis. No text.] I.Google Scholar

Guiart, J. and Grimbert, L. (1906), Précis de diagnostic chimique, microscopique et parasitologique. Paris: F. R. de Rudeval. XV + 960 pp., 500 Figs. [pp. 679–682, Figs. 421–3, Pediculus capitis ♀ and nit, Phthirius pubis ♀, copied from Gruby.] G.Google Scholar

Guibout, E. (1881), Dermatoses pediculaires. Thérap. contemp., Paris I. 769–775. [i.c.] D.Google Scholar

Guiteras, J. (1915), Insect borne diseases in Pan-America. 42 pp., 2 Charts, 2 Text-figs. Issued by the Dept. of Health and Charities Republic of Cuba. Habana: La Modema Poesia. [pp. 21–2, brief reference to lice and typhus. Nothing original.] O.Google Scholar

Gunn, J. A. (5. 05. 1917), A note on the prevention of pediculosis. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 579–580. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haesebroucq, (1848), Observation de phthiriasis d'une espèce très-rare chez l'homme. Ann. Soc. méd. d'émulat. de la Flandre occid., Roulers, II. 391. [i.c.] R. ?Google Scholar

Haight, H. H. (05. 1916), Endemic typhus in Toronto. Canadian Pract. and Rev., Toronto, XLI. 185–191. [Abstract in Rev. of Applied Entomol., s. B v. 33 states author gives history of a suspected case. P. capitis on patient's head.] D.Google Scholar

Halpern, J. (1895). [On several infectious forms of…pediculosis capitia.] Gaz. lek., Warszawa, 2 ser., XV. 380–2. [i.c.] D.Google Scholar

Hamer, W. H. (1910), Flies and vermin. Report of the Public Health Committee, London County Council, for 1909, Appendix IV. 9 pp., 4 Charts. [Lice, pp. 7–9, Chart IV.]Google Scholar

Hammerl, (1915). [Destruction of Pediculi.] Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. No. 3. [Cit. by Galewsky, 1915, p. 285.] K.Google Scholar

Handlirsch, A. (1903), Zur Phylogenie der Hexapoden. (Vorlaufige Mitteilung.) Sitzungsber. K. K. Akad. Wiss. Wien, math.-naturw. Kl., CXII. 1 Abt., 716–738, 1 Pl. [Systematic position of Pediculidae.] S.Google Scholar

Handlirsch, A. (1905), Phylogenetisches über Insekten. Zool. Anzeiger, XXVIII. 664–670. 4 Figs. [pp. 668–670; lice; mouthparts.] A.Google Scholar

Hansell, H. F. (1883–1884), Pediculus pubis in the eyelashes. Polydinic, Philadelphia I. 119. [i.c.] D.Ph.Google Scholar

Hanser, R. (12. 10. 1916), Zur Aetiologie des Fleckfiebers. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLII. 1254. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harding, G. F. (27. 01. 1898), Pediculosis. Boston Med. and Surg. Journ., CXXXVIII. 95. D.Google Scholar

Harrison, L. (07. 1916), A preliminary account of the structure of the mouthparts in the body-louse. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., XVIII. 207–226, Pl. VII., 7 Text-figs. A.I.Google Scholar

Hartmann, A. (15. 07. 1915), Zur Behandlung und Ansteckungsverhütung des Flecktyphus. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 861. D.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hase, A. (1915), Beiträge zu einer Biologie der Kleiderlaus. Zeitschr. f. angewandte Entomol., Berlin II., Heft 2, with 47 Figs. Also issued as No. 1 of Flugschriften d. Deutsch. Gesellsch. f. angew. Entomol., 95 pp., 47 Text-figs. Berlin: P. Parey. [Cited at length by Müller, 1915, p. 66; also by Friedmann, 1916, p. 338; and by Hase himself, 29. 11. 1915; abstract in Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., 1 Abt., Ref.,LXIV. 528. Inaccessible.] B.K.Google Scholar

Hase, A. (29. 11. 1915), Weitere Beobaohtungen über die Läuseplage. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Parasitenk. u. Infektionskr., 1 Abt., Orig., LXXVII. 153–163. D.B.Google Scholar

Hase, A. (1916), Ueber die Entwickelungsstadien der Eier und über die Larven der Kleiderlaus (Pediculus corporis de Geer = vestimenti Nitzsch). Naturw. Wochenschr., XXXI. pp. 1 et seq. [Abstract in Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., 1 Abt., Ref., LXIV. 530, reabstr. in Rev. Appl. Entomol., s. B v. 44. Original inaccessible.] B.Google Scholar

Heberden, W. (1831), De morbo pediculari. Opera medica. Leipzig. [M.] D.Google Scholar

Hebra, (1865), Ueber die sogenannte Phthiriasis (Läusesucht). Wien. med. Presse, VI. 745, 777, 801, 849, 876. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar

Hebra, (1866), Noch ein Wort ueber die sogenannte Läusesucht (Phthiriasis). Wien. med. Wochenschr., XVII. 425, 441. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar

Hegler, C. and Prowazek, S. V. (3. 11. 1913), Untersuchungen über Fleckfieber. Vorläufiger Bericht. (A) Klinischer Teil von C. Hegler. (B) Aetiologischer Teil von S. von Prowazek. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., L. (No. 44), 2035–2040, 4 Charts. [The full account of these investigations was to have appeared shortly afterwards in Brauer's Beiträge zur Klinik der Infektionskrankheiten. The latter inaccessible.] D.Google Scholar

Heisler, I. (1892), Pediculi pubis [on the scalp]. Orvosi hetil., Budapest, XXXVI. 364. Also (transl.) Arch. f. Dermatol. u. Syph., Wien, XXIV. 589. Also (transl. abstract) Pest med.-chir. Presse, XXVIII. 978. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar

Hellwig, J. (1680), Phthiriasis subitanea. In his Obs. phys. med., 4°, Aug. Vindel., 143–147. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar

Hemmann, A. (1850), Vertilgung von Pediculus capitis. Bern. Gor.-Bl. f. Aerzte u. Apoth., I. 148. [i.c.] K.Google Scholar

Hermann, J. F. (1804), Mémoire aptérologique, An XII. Strasbourg, pp. 114, Pls. I.–IX. [p. 12, Pediculus included under Aptera; brief mention only.] S.Google Scholar

Herxheimer, and Nathan, (1915). [Trikresol powder recommended.] Therap. Monatsh., No. 2, p. 87. [Cited by Bagg, 15. 05. 1915, p. 178, Swoboda, and others.] K.Google Scholar

Herz, L. ( ), Zur Ætiologie des Herpes ciliaris (conjunctivitis lymphatica). Klin. Monatsbl.f. Augenheilk., p. 418. [Cited by Blanchard, 1890, p. 446.] Ph.D.Google Scholar

Heusner, H. L. (14. 12. 1915), Bemerkungen zur Bekämpfung der Läuseplage. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 1743. (Feldärztl. Beil., No. 50.) K.Google Scholar

Hewetson, J. (1894), Note on the significance of taches bleuâtres. Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull., V. 19. Ph.Google Scholar

Hewitt, C. G. (4. 04. 1912), Transmission of Typhus fever by Lice. Canadian Entomol., XLIV. 103–104. [A brief summary of recent work on typhus; contains inaccuracies.] O.Google Scholar

Hewitt, C. G. (1916), The suppression of two insects affecting troops. Special circular for Canadian Expeditionary Force. Ottawa: Govt. Printing Bureau, 5 pp. [About flies and lice, popular leaflet, nothing original.] O.Google Scholar

Heymann, B. (8. 08. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Kleiderläuse. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., LII. 253–4; also Zeitschr. f. ärztl. Fortbildung, No. 10; also [brief notice] Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 325. K.Google Scholar

Heymann, B. (18. 08. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Kleiderläuse. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infektionskr., LXXX. 299–323, Pl. VI., 3 Text-figs. [Includes all and more than is contained in this author's previous papers.] B.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heymann, B. (30. 06. 1916), Beiträge zur Frage von der Beteiligung der Kopflaus an der Fleckfieber-Verbreitung. Med. Klinik, XII. 480–8. [Abstract in Rev. Appl. Entom., V. 32, discusses differences between head and body lice; regards evidence that capitis conveys typhus as inconclusive.] D.Google Scholar

Hilgenberg, C. A. (1854), Augenentzündung durch Pediculus pubis. Org. f. d. ges. Heilk., Aachen, III. 54. [i.c.] D.Ph.Google Scholar

Hindle, E. (26. 02. 1917), Notes on the biology of Pediculus humanus. Parasitology, IX. 259–265 (with a Foreword by G. H. F. Nuttall). B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, A. (1881), Handbuch der historisch-geographischen Pathologie. 3 vols. Stuttgart. [I. p. 405 refers to similarity in epidemiology of typhus and relapsing fever.] D.Google Scholar

Hirsch, A. (1883), Handbook of Geographical and Historical Pathology, transl. by Creighton, C.. London: New Sydenham Society. [Translation of Hirsch, 1881. Vol. I. 545–592, Typhus; Handbook of Geographical and Historical Pathology, 593–616, Relapsing fever.] D.Google Scholar

Holland, W. (1913). [Pediculosis as a cause of anaemia.] Tidsskr.f. d. Norske Laegefo., Kristiania, XXXIII. 829–832. [I.M.] D.Google Scholar

Holste, A. (12. 07. 1915), Ueber Lausofan. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., LII. 738–740. K.Google Scholar

Hönck, (25. 03. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Kleiderläuse. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 368, 3 Figs. [Author is ‘Chefarzt im Feldlazarett in W. Flandern.’] K.Google Scholar

Hooke, R. (1665), Micrographia or some physiological description of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses, etc. 246 pp., 38 Pls. Fol. London. [Obs. LIX. of a Louse, pp. 211–213, and Pl 35.] A.B.I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hooper, R. W. (1853), Pediculi from the roots of the eyelashes. American Journ. Med. Sci., Philadelphia n. s., XXV. 374–6. Also Extr. Rec. Boston Soc. Med. Improve., I. 305–7. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar

Hornstein, F. (1. 06. 1915), Ueber Cinol als Läusebekämpfungsmittel. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 767. (Feldärztl. Beil., No. 22.) K.Google Scholar

Hudson, A. C. (17. 10. 1914), Pediculosis of the scalp and eye disease. Lancet, II. 966. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, C. W. and Clark, P. F. (1912), Experiments on Insect Transmission of the Virus of Poliomyelitis. Journ. Exper. Med., XVI. 850–9. [Experiments with Pediculus capitis and P. vestimenti were negative.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howell, B. W. (02. 1916), The typhus fever epidemic in Serbia, 1915. St. Bartholomew's Hosp. Journ., London, XXIII. 52–54, 1 Chart. [Casual reference to lice as probable carriers and ‘perhaps fleas and bugs to a slighter degree.’ Wore linen gowns and rubber boots, changed linen frequently, searched for lice, and anointed body with paraffin or vermijelli against lice.] D.K.Google Scholar

Husemann, T. (1856), Ein Beitrag zur Lehre der sogenannten Phthiriasis. Zeitschr. d. K.-K. Gesellsch. d. Aerzte in Wien, XII. 497–533. [s.] Ph.Google Scholar

Husemann, T. (1867), Kaiser Arnulf und König Snyo, zwei Fälle von Phthiriasis aus dem Mittelalter. Deutsche Klinik, Berlin, XIX. 33. [i.c.] H.Google Scholar

Izar, G. (04. 1916), Sulla profilassi del Pediculus hominis. Giorn. di med. milit. [Abstr. in Bull. Inst. Pasteur, XIV. 742.] K.Google Scholar

Jacobsthal, E. (7. 09. 1916), Eine Anregung zur Anstellung von Kutisreaktionen bei Pleckfieber. Deutsche med. Woohenschr., XLII. 1093. [Suggests trial of extract prepared from lice for testing cutaneous reaction in relapsing fever. Cites papers on similar subject by Bocha-Lima (1) ‘Bericht an das Kriegsministerium,’ and (2) Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Tropen-Hyg., 20, 1916, (3) also Nöller, Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., No. 23, 1916.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacquet, L. (1897 ?), Pédiculose des vêtements; mélanodermie parasitaire. Mus. de l'hôp. St. Louis Icon. d. malad. cutan. et syph., Paris, pp. 299–302, 1 Pl. Also (transl.) in Pict. Atlas Skin Dis. and Syph., etc. St. Louis Hosp., London and Philadelphia, 1895–1897, pp. 265–8, 1 Pl [i.c.] D.Google Scholar

Jamieson, W. A. (1888), On some rarer effects of pediculi. Brit. Journ. Dermatol., London I. 321–7. Ph.D.Google Scholar

Jamieson, W. A. (1895), The treatment of pediculosis vestimentorum. Brit. Journ. Dermatol., VII. 248. K.Google Scholar

Jamieson, W. A. (1899), The cause of the reappearance of pediculi vestimentorum after apparently thorough treatment. Brit. Journ. Dermatol., XI. 193. K.Google Scholar

Jeanneret-Minkine, M. (1915), Le typhus exanthématique. Cr. 8°, 189 pp., 1 Pl., Paris: Payot et Cie. [A very interesting account of personal experiences of lice and typhus fever in Serbia, etc.] D.Google Scholar

Jeanselme, (1905), La phtiriase et son traitement. Journ. de méd. int., Paris, IX. 31–3. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar

Jeitteles, J. (1841), Phthiriasis. Oesterr. med. Wochenschr., Wien, 632–5. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar

Joly, P. R. (1898), Importance du rôle des insectes dans la transmission des maladies infectieuses et parasitaires. Du formol comme insecticide. These. Bordeaux: Imprimerie du Midi. 90 pp. [Cit. by Nuttall, 1899, p. 33.] D.K.Google Scholar

Jousseaume, F. (12. 01. 1915), Destruction des poux de corps. Bull. Acad. de Méd.; rev. in Rev. d'hyg., XXXVII. 73. K.Google Scholar

Jürgens, (8. 03. 1915), Ueber Flecktyphus. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., LII. 252–3. D.Google Scholar

Karjavine, P. (1789), Description du pou vu au microscope. 1 Pl. 4°, Carouge. [French and Russian text.] [s.] A.Google Scholar

Keferstein, A. (1837), Die den Menschen und den Thieren schädlichen Insekten. 8°, Erfurt, [s.] G.Google Scholar

Kellogg, V. L. (23. 05. 1914), Ectoparasites of Mammals. American Nat., New York, XLVIII. 257–279. [Anoplura of man are Phthirius and 2 spp. of Pediculus occurring throughout the world. Pediculus spp. also occur on chimpanzee and Ateles, but not on other animals, and afford evidence of genetic relationship between apes and man.] Geo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kern, (20. 01. 1915), Au sujet de la prophylaxie et destruction des parasites de l'homine. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 79–80. [Experiences of general prophylaxis in Morocco. Nothing new.] K.O.Google Scholar

Kinloch, J. P. (19. 06. 1915), An investigation of the best methods of destroying lice and other body vermin. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 1038–1041. Abstract also in U.S. Publ. Health Reports, XXX., issued as Reprint, No. 293. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinloch, J. P. (3. 06. 1916), An investigation of the best methods of destroying lice and other body vermin. II. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 789–793. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirby, W. and Spence, W. (1826), Introduction to Entomology, vol. IV. London. [p. 393, Anoplura classed under Aptera in the order Hexapoda; brief mention only.] S.Google Scholar

Kirstein, F. (1915), Das Fleckfieber und seine Bekämpfung. Veröffentl. a. d. Gebiete d. Medizinalverwalt., Heft 9. [Cited by Friedmann, 31. 01. 1916, p. 338. Inaccessible.] D.K.Google Scholar

Kisskalt, K. (6. 08. 1914), Das Aussterben der ‘Krankheiten der Unkultur’. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XL. 1606–7. [In a footnote recommends SO₂, CS₂ or xylol for killing lice.] K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kisskalt, K. (4. 02. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Läuseplage. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 154. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kisskalt, K. (9. 05. 1915), see Editorial (same date).Google Scholar

Kisskalt, K. (13. 05. 1915), Das jahreszeitliche Auftreten der Kriegsseuchen. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 579–582. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kisskalt, K. (31. 01. 1916), Zur mikroskopischen Anatomie von Ped. vestimentorum. Centralbl. f. Bakt. u. Parasitenk., 1 Abt., Orig., LXXII. 338–9, 1 Pl. [Photomicrographs.] A.Google Scholar

Kisskalt, K. and Friedmann, A. (1. 04. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Läuseplage. II. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 397–8. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klemperer, G. and Zinn, W. (02. 1915), Zur Diagnose und Prophylaxe des Fleckfiebers. Therap. d. Gegenw., LVI. 41–45. Abstract in Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 324. D.K.Google Scholar

Knaffl-Lenz, E. v. (1. 07. 1915), Beitrag zur Läusefrage. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 26, 708–9. K.Google Scholar

Kniphoff, J. H. (1759), Dissertatio de Pediculus inguinalibus Insectis et Vermibus homini molestis. Erfurt. [M.] Ph.Google Scholar

Knott, J. (1897), Morbus pediculosus. Med. Press and Giro., London, n.s., LXIII. 609–612, 634–7, 658–660; LXIV. 31. G.H.K.Google Scholar

Knott, J. (29. 07. 1905), Phthiriasis. American Med., Philadelphia, X. 188–195. [Reprinted, with no apparent alteration or explanation, from Knott 1897.] G.H.K.Google Scholar

Korbsch, R. (5. 10. 1916), Zur Kenntnis der Febris wolhynica. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLII. 1217–1219, 2 Figs, 6 Charts. [Relapsing fever. Reports three negative infection experiments on himself and another physician wherein two lice, fed on typhus patients, bit the doctors afterwards without effect.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraus, R. (25. 03. 1915), Zur Frage der persönlichen Prophylaxe gegen Typhus exanthematicus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 314–5. K.Google Scholar

Kraus, R. (1915), Nachtrag zu meinem Artikel der persönlichen Prophylaxe gegen Flecktyphus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 442. [I.M.] K.Google Scholar

Küchenmeister, F. (1855), Die in und an dem Körper des lebenden Menschen vorkommenden Parasiten, 1 Abt., Die thierischen Parasiten. 486 pp., 9 Pl. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. [pp. 439 et seq. lice infesting man.] G.Google Scholar

Küchenmeister, F. (1857), Ueber die angeblichen Fälle von Läusesucht in der Bibel und bei Josephus. Deutsche Klinik, Berlin, IX. 341, 361. [i.c.] H.Google Scholar

Kuhn, E. (18. 04. 1915), Die Entfernung von Kleiderläusen durch Schwefeldämpfe. Med. Klinik, XI. 456–7. K.Google Scholar

Kulka, W. (4. 05. 1915), Ein neues Mittel zur Läusevertilgung. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 630–1. (Feldärztl. Beilage, No. 18.) K.Google Scholar

Kurz, M. D. (1832), Ueber Phthiriasis. Magazin f. d. ges. Heilk., Berlin, XXXVI. 97–110. [Cited by Landois, 1865, p. 501. Title corrected from s.] D.Google Scholar

Labbé, H. and Wahl, M. (09. 1915), Recherches sur l'intoxication des insectes du genre Pediculus par les vapeurs de diftérents corps minéraux ou organiques. Journ. de physiol. et de path, gén., XVI. 872–888. B.Google Scholar

Lagane, L. (14. 09. 1912), Les dangers du pou. Presse méd., Paris, XX., Suppl. 949–951. K.Google Scholar

Lamarck, J. B. de (1801), Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertébres. 452 pp. 8°, Paris [p. 183, Genus Pediculus (included under Arachnides antennistes with Scolopendra, Julus, Podura, etc.). One sp.: P. humanus L. Brief mention only.]Google Scholar

Lamarck, J. B. de (1835–1845), Histoire naturelle des a/nimaux sans vertebres. 11 vols., 8°, 2nd ed. [Vol. V. 50 P. vestimenti. Cited by Piaget, 1880, p. 623.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landesberg, M. (1882), Phthiriasis pubis of the eyebrows. Med. Bull., Philadelphia, IV. 133. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar

Landois, L. (1864 a), Untersuchungen über die auf dem Menschen schmarotzenden Pediculinen. I. Anatomie des Phthirius inguinalis Leach. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., Leipzig, XIV. 1–26, Pls. I.–V. [Important.] Ph.I.Google Scholar

Landois, L. (1864 b), Untersuchungen über die auf dem Menschen schmarotzenden Pediculinen. II. Historisch-kritische Untersuchung über die Läusesucht. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., Leipzig, XIV. 27–41. [Numerous citations from classical and older authors regarding pediculosis. Interesting.] H.Google Scholar

Landois, L. (1865 a), Untersuchungen über die auf dem Menschen schmarotzenden Pedikuliden. III. Anatomie des Pediculus vestimenti Nitzsch. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., XV. 32–55, Pls. II.–IV. A.I.Google Scholar

Landois, L. (1865 b), Untersuchungen über die auf dem Menschen schmarotzenden Pedikuliden. IV. Abhandlung (Schluss). Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., XV. 494–503, Pl. 38. [Anatomy of P. capitis; Ph. inguinalis, muscular system; pediculosis, historical.] A.H.I.Ph.Google Scholar

Landois, L. (1866 a), Ueber die Existenz der echten Läusesucht. Wien. med. Wochenschr., XVI. 265, 281, 297. D.Google Scholar

Landois, L. (1866 b), Zur Frage ueber die Existenz der echten Läusesucht (Phthiriasis). Wien. med. Wochenschr., 620, 623. D.Google Scholar

Larrieu, J. F. (1915), Notes sur l'étiologie et la prophylaxie du typhus exanthématique. Paris: Vigot frères. 15 pp. 8°. [I.M.] D.K.Google Scholar

Latreille, P. A. (1796), Précis des caractères génériques des insectes, disposés dans un ordre naturel. An V. 12°, Brive. xii + 201 pp. [Pediculus, p. 175] S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latreille, P. A. (1804), Histoire générate et particulière des Crustacéa et des Insectes. 14 vols. 8°, Paris. [Vol. VIII. 93–6, Pediculus humanus, P. cervicalis Latr., P. pubis, brief description.] S.Google Scholar

Laznia (1915), Die Laus und ihre Bekämpfung. Pharmaceutische Post, 1915, p. 301. [Cited by Müller, 1915, p. 54.] K.Google Scholar

Leach, W. E. (1810), Articles ‘Entomology’ and ‘Insecta’ in Edinburgh Encyclopedia. Edinburgh, 4°. [Vol. IX. 77, P. humanus, P. cervicalis, Ph. inguinalis; cited by Stephens, 1829.]Google Scholar

Leach, W. E. (1814–1817), Zoological Miscellany, etc., London, in 3 vols. [III. 66–7, Pediculus.] S.Google Scholar

Leach, W. E. (1818), Articles ‘Annulosa’ and ‘Entomology’ in Supplement to Encyclopedia Britannica. Edinburgh. [Cited re Pediculus by Stephens, 1829.]Google Scholar

Lebedeff, V. N. (1915). [Hydrocyanic acid gas used in destruction of insects which transmit disease: lice, fleas, bugs, etc.] MeflimiiHCKOe 0603ptHie [Rev. of Med.], Moscow, LXXXIV. 394–9, 1 Pl. K.Google Scholar

Leboeuf, (1914), La lèpre en Nouvelle Calédonie et Dépendances. Ann. Hyg. Méd. Coloniate, Paris, XVII. 177–197; abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., London, ser. B, II. 79. [Negative evidence of lice as carriers.] D.Google Scholar

Leeuwenhoek, A. van, The select works of Antony van Leeuwenhoek, containing microscopic discoveries in many of the works of nature. Transl. from the Dutch and Latin editions published by the author, by Samuel, Hoole. London: Philanthropic Soc. (1807). 28×21 cm. 2 vols. viii + 314 and 344 + viii pp., 20 Plates, [II. pp. 163–169, Pl. XVI., Figs. 1–8, P. vestimenti. The translator appends a note that ‘the author is much more prolix and circumstantial than here set down,’ the translation ‘gives the substance and general result of his observations.’] A.B.I.Google Scholar

Lefèbre, C. (1823), Du pou et du meilleur procédé à employer dans son extirpation. 4°, Strasbourg, [i.c.] K.Google Scholar

Lefroy, H. Maxwell- (1916), Measures for avoidance and extermination of flies, mosquitoes, lice and other vermin. 2nd ed.17 pp., 5 Figs. Calcutta and Simla: Thacker, Spink and Co. K.Google Scholar

Lefroy, H. Maxwell-, and Hewlett, F. M. (1909), Indian Insect Life. A Manual of the Insects of the Plains (Tropical India), xii + 786 pp., 84 Pls. 536 Figs. Calcutta and Simla: Thacker, Spink and Co.; London: W. Thacker and Co. [pp. 762–764. Pediculidae. Nothing original.] O.Google Scholar

Legendre, J., (12. 05. 1915), Destruction des poux de corps par le crésyl et le brossage. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exotique, Paris, VIII. 280–3. K.Google Scholar

Legroux, R. (21. 07. 1915), Sur la destruction des poux. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot., VIII. 470–3. K.Google Scholar

Lehmann, (1. 04. 1915), Insektenpulverbestimmung. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 424 [note of 5 lines], abstract from München. med. Wochenschr., No. 10. K.Google Scholar

Lelean, P. S. (1917), Sanitation in War. 2nd ed.336 pp., 54 Figs. 17 × 11 cm. London: J. and A. Churchill. [De-lousing, pp. 141–144, 160–162, 199–208.] K.Google Scholar

Le Play, and Débu, (1906), Un cas de maladie des vagabonds. Bull. Soc. franç. de dermatol. et syph., Paris, XVII. 60–63. Also Ann. de dermatol. et syph., 4 s., VII. 141–4. Ph.Google Scholar

Letulle, M. (20. 01. 1915), Mesures prophylactiques contre le typhus dans le camp retranché de Paris. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 20–25. D.K.Google Scholar

Letulle, M. and Bordas, (20. 03. 1915), La désinfection entomo-parasitaire (Prophylaxie du typhus). Rev. d'hyg. et de police sanit., XXXVII. 245–256, 10 Figs. [Disinfecting apparatus etc., photomicrographs of lice.] K.Google Scholar

Leuckart, R. (1855), Ueber die Mikropyle und den feineren Bau der Schalenhaut bei den Insekteneiern. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der Befruchtung. Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol., Berlin, Jahrg. 1855, pp. 90–264, Pls. VII.–XI. [Haematopinus and Pediculus.] A.I.Google Scholar

Leuckart, R. (1855 a), Parasitismus und Parasiten. Arch. f. phys. Heilk., XI. 199–259, 379–437. [Tab. 138, II. f. 1, cited by Piaget, 1880, p. 620, re anatomy of Pediculus.] A.Google Scholar

Lieberthal, D. (1902), Eczema of the scalp due to pediculosis. Med. Standard, Chicago, XXV. 476. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar

Lindner, E. (25. 03. 1915), Zur Epidemiologie und Klinik des Flecktyphus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 12, 315–6. [Whilst recognizing louse transmission of typhus, he believes that there may be other modes of infection.] D.Google Scholar

Linnaeus, C. (1758), Systema Naturae, Regnum Animalle, ed. 10, pp. 824, Holmiae. [pp. 610–611, briefest mention of Pediculus humanus L. (Fn. svec. 1153), “Habitat in capite et vestimentis humanis.” P. pubis L. (Fn. svec. 1154).] S.Google Scholar

Lobaczewski, A. R. v. (8. 04. 1915), Zur Frage der “Entlausung.” Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 373–4. K.Google Scholar

Löhe, (24. 05. 1915), Erfahrungen bei der Anwendung von Mitteln zur Bekämpfung der Läuseplage. Berlin. klin. Wochenschr., LII. 552. K.Google Scholar

Low, R. B. (1916), The epidemiology of typhus exanthematicus in recent years. XLIVth Ann. Rep. Local Govt. Board, 1914–1915. Supplt. containing Rep. of the Med. Officer. [Cd. 8153.] pp. 28–89. D.Google Scholar

Löwenhardt, (1840), Fall von Phthiriasis durch Tabacksabkochung geheilt. Wochenschr. f. d. ges. Heilk., Berlin, pp. 418–420. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Lorange, O. (1913), Pediculi capitis. Tidsskr.f. d. norske Laegefor., Kristiania, XXXIII. 977–983. [I.M.]Google Scholar

Luton, (1876), Affection pédiculaire. Bull. Soc. méd. de Reims (1875), No. 14, p. 29. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar

Machold, B. (6. 06. 1915), Lausofan. Med. Klin., Berlin, XI. 645. K.Google Scholar

McCoy, G. W. and Clegg, M. T. (6. 09. 1912), A note on acid-fast bacilli in head lice (Pediculus capitis). Publ. Health Rep., Washington, XXVII. 1464–5. [Found bacilli indistinguishable from B. leprae in two lice from case of nodular leprosy. Examinations hitherto made by authors were negative.] D.Google Scholar

McIntyre, G. (1905–1906), Larkspur in the treatment of pediculosis. Illinois Med. Bull., Chicago, VI. 370. [I.M.] K.Google Scholar

Mackie, F. P. (14. 12. 1907), The part played by Pediculus corporis in the transmission of relapsing fever. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 1706–9. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, F. P. (1913), The body-louse (Pediculus vestimenti) as a disease carrier. The body-louse as a carrier of relapsing fever. Proc. 3rd Meeting Gen. Malaria Committee Madras, Nov. 18–20, 1912, pp. 281–289 (Simla: Govt. Central Branch Press). D.Google Scholar

Mackie, F. P. (04. 1915), Insects and Kala-azar. Ind. Journ. Med. Res., Calcutta, II. 942–9. [Pediculus humanus and P. capitis, captured or fed on persons with Kala-azar, examined with negative result for Leishmania.] D.Google Scholar

Macleay, W. S. (1821), Horae Entomologicae, I. Pt. II. London, [pp. 287, 392, Anoplura placed as an order in the sub-class Ametabola under Annulosa.] S.Google Scholar

Maitland, T. G. (21. 08. 1915), Notes on the typhus epidemic in Serbia, 1915. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 283–5. D.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malinin, J. T. (1906), Russian: Anti-mosquito liquid as a remedy against malaria. Tiflis, 118 pp. Cited by Grigorieff, A. X., see abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., London, s. B, III. 105–7. [Fluid recommended since, as a remedy against lice, by various Russian observers.] K.Google Scholar

Mallet, C. (1882), Études sur les taches bleues. Historique et recherches nouvelles. Thèse: Paris. [Cited by Blanchard, 1890, p. 446.] Ph.D.Google Scholar

Manson, Sir P. (1909), see Allbutt and Rolleston.Google Scholar

Marchello, L. (1804), Storia di una rara phthiriasis, o malattia pedicolare. Mem. d. Soc. med. di emulaz. di Genova, III. 65–83. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Marschalko, T. v. (11. 03. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Läuseplage im Felde. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 316–7. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, C. J. (4–11. 01. 1913), On Insects as Porters of Bacterial Infection (The Horace Dobell Lectures, Roy. Coll. Phys., London, Nov. 1912). The Lancet, I. 1–10, 81–89. [Lice, pp. 84, 85, 87, Figs. 16, 17.] Also Brit. Med. Journ. I. 1–8, 59–68. [Lice, pp. 64, 65, 66.] A.Google Scholar

Marzinovsky, E. I. (01. 1915), Russian: Insects, as carriers of infective diseases. Proc. Confer. Bacteriologists, etc., Moscow, pp. 56–8. [Abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., London, ser. B, III. 123–4.] D.K.Google Scholar

Marzocchi, V. (1908), Di una rara localizzazione dello phtirius inguinalis. Giorn. d. R. Accad. Med. Torino, 4 s., XIV. 150–2. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar

Marzocchi, V. (1910), Phthirius inguinalis alia pelle del capo. Giorn. d. R. Accad. Med. Torino, LXXI. 150. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar

Marzocchi, V. (10. 07. 1913), Sur le Phthirius inguinalis. Arch, de Parasitol., Paris, XVI. 314–317. Ph.Google Scholar

Mathews, P. W. P. (1886–1887), Notes on Phthiriasis. Canada Med. and Surg. Journ., Montreal, XV. 45–9. See also remarks by A. L. Smith in Proc. Med.-Chir. Soc. Montreal (1885–7), 1888, pp. 108–112. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Maxwell-Lefroy, H. (05. 1915), see Lefroy.Google Scholar

“Medicus” (1831), Pediculi. Boston Med. and Surg. Journ., IV. 371. [I.M.]Google Scholar

Mégnin, P. (1880), Les Parasites et les Maladies Parasitaires chez l'homme, les animaux domestiques et les animaux sauvages avec lesquels ils peuvent être en contact; insectes, arachnides, crustacés. 478 pp., 65 Figs., 26 Pls. 8°, Paris. G.Google Scholar

Mégnin, P. (1906), Les insectes buveurs de sang et colporteurs des virus. Paris: F. R. de Rudeval. 150 pp., 53 Figs. [Human lice, pp. 87–90, Figs. 35, 36. Published posthumously by the author's son, Mégnin, P. Jr.] G.Google Scholar

Meige, H. (1897), Les pouilleux dans l'art. Nouv. Iconogr. de la Salpetrière, Paris, No. 5. [Refers to pictures by Murillo, Gerard Dow, Adrian and Isaac van Ostade, Pieter de Hooch, etc.] H.I.Google Scholar

Meige, H. (1903), Un document pour les pouilleux dans l'art. N. Iconog. de la Salpetrière, Paris, XVI. 271–2, with illustration. [Reproduces an engraving by Joachim Ottens, 16th century, probably after Brower, which suggests that there were professional destroyers of P. capitis at that date.] I.Google Scholar

Meinert, F. (1891), Pediculus humanus L. et trophi ejus. Lusen og dens Munddele. Entom. Meddel, Copenhagen, III. 58–83, Pl I. A.Google Scholar

Melnikow, N. (1869), Beiträge zur Embryonalentwickelung von Insekten. Arch. f. Naturg., Jahrg. XXXV., Bd. I. 136–189, Pls. VIII.-XI. [pp. 153–186, Figs. 22, 23, 30, 31, 37–39. Embryology of P. capitis.] A.I.Google Scholar

Meltzer, O. (29. 04. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Läuseplage im Felde. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 532–3. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendes, G. (25. 07. 1915), La profilassi del tifo esantematico al campo. Policlinico, Rome, XXII., sez. prat., 995–7. 1 Fig. K.Google Scholar

Mense, (03. 1915), Zur Frage der Bekämpfung des Fleckfiebers und der Läuse. Arch. f. Schiffs- und Tropen-Hyg., XIX. 172–6. K.Google Scholar

Michie, H. C. (1915), Mexican Typhus Fever. Med. Record, New York, LXXXVII. 214–218. [Summary, with brief consideration of Pediculi and advice on prophylaxis.] D.K.Google Scholar

Mjöberg, E. (1910), Studien ueber Mallophagen und Anopluren. (Ph.D. Dissertation.) Upsala: Almquist and Wiksells. 296 pp., 5 Pls., 157 Text-figs. R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moniez, R. (1889), Les parasites de l'homme (animaux et végétaux). Paris: J. B. Baillière. 307 pp., 72 Figs. [Human lice, pp. 224–229, Figs. 61–62 poor.] G.Google Scholar

Moore, L. (6. 03. 1915), Vermin in the trenches. Lancet, I. 528. K.Google Scholar

Morris, M. (1911), see, Allbutt and Rolleston.Google Scholar

Moursou, J. (1877), Nouvelles recherches sur l'origine des taches ombrées. Ann. de Dermatol. et de Syphil, IX. 198. [Cited by Blanchard, 1890, p 446.] Ph.D.Google Scholar

Moursou, J. (1878), A propos de la coïncidence des taches ombrées et des poux du pubis. Mouvement méd., Paris, XVI. 537. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar

Mühlens, P. (1914), Ueber Fleckfieber und Rückfallfieber. München. med. Wochenschr., LXI. 2183–5, 2228–2230. [I.M.] D.Google Scholar

Müller, J. (1915), Zur Naturgeschichte der Kleiderlaus. Das Oesterreichische Sanitätswesen (Wien und Leipzig: Hölder), XXVII., No. 36–38 and No. 47–49 Beilage. Also appeared as a Reprint, 75 pp. (repaged) with 4 coloured Plates and 37 Text-figs., and an Appendix. [Important.] A.B.I.Google Scholar

Müller, M. (1858), Les insectes nuisibles à l'homme, aux animaux et aux plantes. 12°, Paris. [M.] G.Google Scholar

Murchison, C. (1884), A Treatise on the Continued Fevers of Great Britain. 3rd ed.London: Longmans, Green and Co. 731 pp. [Typhus fever, pp. 23–310; Relapsing fever, pp. 311–415. Contains much epidemiological evidence indicating conveyance by lice but the latter not suspected to be vectors. Not surpassed by anything published before or since, except for recent discoveries as to etiology.] Epid.Google Scholar

Murray, A. (1861), On the pediculi infesting the different races of men. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., XXII. 567–578, 2 Pls. Geo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Musselius, A. A. (28. 11. 1915), Expériences et observations de la nourriture des poux de corps et de l'effet produit sur eux par des liquides odoriférentes. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Moscou, I. 170–179. K.Google Scholar

Muto, A, (31. 08. 1916), Nuovo metodo di sterilizzazione entomo-parassitario. Ann. d' Igiene, Rome, XXVI. 493–508, 5 Figs. K.Google Scholar

Nettleship, E. (23. 10. 1869), Notes on the presence of the body-louse in prurigo senilis, and on the occurrence of lice on the head in adults. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 435. D.Google Scholar

Neufeld, (1915), Zur Bekämpfung des Fleckfiebers. Med. Klinik, No. 13, p. 365. [Cited by Heymann, 18. VIII. 1915, p. 320.] D.K.Google Scholar

Neukirch, P. and Zlocisti, T. (5. 03. 1916), Epidemiologische und klinische Erfahrungen bei Fleckfieber in Ostanatolien. Med. Klinik, Berlin, XII., No. 9, 256–9. D.Epid.Google Scholar

Neumann, H. (1896), Ueber die Läusesucht in den Volksschulen. Zeitschr. f. Schulgesundheitspl., Hamburg and Leipzig, IX. 185–191. D.Google Scholar

Neumann, L.-G. (1892), Traité des maladies parasitaires non microbiennes des animaux domestiques. 2nd ed.Paris: Asselin et Houzeau. XVI + 767 pp., 364 Figs. [p. 64 brief reference only to human lice.] O.Google Scholar

Neumann, L.-G. (1910), Notes sur les Pédiculidés. II. Arch. de Parasitol., XIV. 401–414, 8 Figs. [pp. 410–413, Pediculus. Throws doubt upon the validity of specific differences between P. capitis and P. vestimenti.] S.Google Scholar

Neumann, R. O. (2. 03. 1909), Ueber das Verhalten der Spirochäten des Rückfallfiebers im Tierkörper und die experimentelle Uebertragung der Parasiten durch Zecken und Läuse. München. med. Wochenschr., p. 477. [Transmission of Russian and African strains of relapsing fever from rat to rat by means of rat-lice, Haematopinus spinulosus, transferred without delay in large numbers from sick to healthy rats which developed relapsing fever after 6–7 days.] R.D.Google Scholar

Neumann, R. O. and Mayer, M. (1914), Atlas und Lehrbuch wichtiger tierischer Parasiten und ihrer Ueberträger mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Tropenpathologie. München: J. F. Lehmann. VI + 580 pp., 45 coloured Plates, 237 Text-figs, with descriptive text. [p. 565, briefest treatment; Pl. XLIV., Figs. 20, 21 ♀, excellent.] I.Google Scholar

Neumayer, V. L. (13. 07. 1915), Zur Frage des persönlichen Lausschutzes. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 963–4. K.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. (12. 07. 1909), Reproduction expérimentale du typhus exanthématique chez le singe. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, CXLIX. 157–160. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. (04. 1910), Recherches expérimentales sur le typhus exanthématique entreprises à l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis pendant l'année 1909. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XXIV. 243–249. [Other papers follow which were written in collaboration under the covering title above cited. Vide pp. 249–275.] D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. (01. 1911), Recherches expérimentales sur le typhus exanthématique entreprises à l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis pendant l'année 1910. (II. Mém.) Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XXV. 1–13. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. (01. 1911), Recherches expérimentales sur le typhus exanthématique entreprises à l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis pendant l'année 1910. (II. Mém.) Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XXV. 1–13. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. (14. 04. 1915), Quelques points concernant le typhus exanthématique. Bull. Soc. path, exotique, Paris, VIII. 160–1. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. and Blaizot, L. (1. 04. 1916), Recherches expérimentales sur le typhus exanthématique etc. Arch. Inst. Pasteur de Tunis, IX. 127–134. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C., Blaizot, L. and Conseil, E. (10. 06. 1912), Etiologie de la fièvre récurrente. Son mode de transmission par le pou. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, CLIV. 1636–8. Also Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, Part III. 110–112. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. (26. 08. 1912), Conditions de transmission de la fièvre récurrente par le pou. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, CLV. 481–4. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. (1913), Etudes sur la fièvre récurrente. I. L'épidemie tunisienne de 1912 et la démonstration expérimentale de la transmission de la fièvre récurrente par les poux. Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, VIII., Part I. 1–30. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. (12. 02. 1913), Du rôle négatif des poux dans la transmission expérimentale de la fièvre de tiques. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot., Paris, VI. 106–7. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. (03. 1913), Etiologie de la fièvre récurrente; son mode de transmission par le pou. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Paris, XXVII. 204–225. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. and Blanc, G. (15. 06. 1914), Les spirilles de la fièvre récurrente sont-ils virulents aux phases successives de leur évolution chez le pou? Démonstration de leur virulence à un stade invisible. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, pp. 1815–7. Also Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, IX. 63–4. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. (1. 12. 1914), Études sur la fièvre récurrente poursuivies à l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis. II^me Mém. (1914). Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, IX. 69–83. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C., Blanc, G. and Conseil, E. (3. 11. 1914), Quelques points de l'étude expérimentale du typhus exanthématique. C.R. Acad. Sci., pp. 661–4. [Preliminary note to paper dated 1. 12. 1914, q.v. infra.] D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C., Blanc, G. and Conseil, E. (1. 12. 1914), Nouvelles recherches expérimentales sur le typhus exanthématique pratiquées à l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis pendant l'année 1914. Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, IX. 84–121. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C., Comte, C. and Conseil, E. (6. 09. 1909), Transmission expérimentale du typhus exanthématique par le pou du corps. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, CXLIX. 486–9. Also (04. 1910) Ann. Instit. Pasteur, XXIV. 261–267. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. and Conseil, E. (01. 1911), Le typhus exanthématique expérimental du singe. Espèces sensibles. Passages. Virulence du sang aux diverses périodes de la maladie. Immunisation. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XXV. 13–55. D.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. and Conseil, E. (20. 01. 1915), Nécessité des mesures à prendre pour préserver nos armées en campagne du typhus exanthématique et du typhus récurrent. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 18–20. Also Presse méd., pp. 18–19. D.K.Google Scholar

Nicolle, C. and Conseil, E. (20. 02. 1915), Nos connaissances sur l'étiologie du typhus exanthématique et de la fièvre récurrente. Leur application à la prévention de ces maladies en particulier dans nos armées en campagne. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 172–205. [History, geographical distribution, etiology, predisposing causes, prophylaxis. A good summary.] D.K.Google Scholar

Nitzsch, C. L. (1818), Die Familien und Gattungen der Thierinsecten (insecta epizoa); als Prodromus einer Naturgeschichte derselben. Magaz. der Entomol. (Germar), Halle, III. pp. 261–316. [Pediculus, pp. 282, 304–5.] S.Google Scholar

Nocht, B. and Halberkann, J. (4. 05. 1915), Beiträge zur Läusefrage. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 626–7 (Feldärztliche Beilage, No. 18). B.K.Google Scholar

Noel, P. (02.–03. 1916), Les mouches, les moustiques, les poux et les rats dans les tranchées. Bull. trim. Lab. Entomol. Agric. Seine infér., Rouen, pp. 9–15. [Abstr. in Rev. Appl. Ent., IV., ser. B, 53.] K.Google Scholar

Noeller, W. (10. 07. 1916), Beitrag zur Flecktyphus Uebertragung durch Läuse. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., LIII. 778–780. [Reviewed in Trop. Dis. Bull., VIII. 482. Original inaccessible. See further under Jacobsthal.] B.D.Google Scholar

Nørregaard, K. (1907). [Larvae in wounds; pediculosis.] Ugesk. f. Laeger, Copenhagen, 5 R., XIV. 1059–66. [I.M.] D.Google Scholar

Nuttall, G. H. F.. (10. 1899), On the rôle of insects, Arachnids and Myriapods, as carriers in the spread of bacterial and parasitic diseases of man and animals. A critical and historical study. Johns Hopkins Hosp. Rep., VIII. 154 pp., 3 Pls. Also (transl.) in Hygienische Rundschau, IX. pp. 209 et seq. Also, as a separate publication, translated by Dr Levrier, Bordeaux: Imprimerie du Midi, 161 pp. D.Google Scholar

Nuttall, G. H. F.. (01. 1913), The Herter Lectures. I. Spirochaetosis. Parasitology, V. 262–274. Also Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull., XXIV. 33–39, 9 Figs. [Summary to date regarding Pediculus, Cimex and relapsing fever.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nuttall, G. H. F.. (26. 02. 1917), Studies on Pediculus. I. The copulatory apparatus and the process of copulation in Pediculus humanus. Parasitology; IX. 293–324, 2 Pls., 12 Text-figs. A.B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nuttall, G. H. F.. (3. 03. 1917), The Louse problem Brit. Med. Journ., I. 297. [Abstract of discussion of paper by Bacot, q.v.]Google Scholar

Nysten, P. H. (1858), Dictionnaire de Méd., de, Chir., de Pharm., etc. 11^ème ed. par E. Littré and Ch. Robin, 1671 pp., 500 Figs. [Phthiriase, p. 1080; Pou, p. 1140.]Google Scholar

Official Instructions (18. 10. 1915). [Instructions for the destruction of clotheslice.] HaBiciia BcepocciftcKaro Coroaa ropojoBi. [Bulletins of All-Russian Union of Towns, Moscow, No. 18, pp. 58–60; abstract in Rev. Applied Entomol., London, ser. B, IV. 13.] K.Google Scholar

Official Instructions (18. 11. 1915), Bekämpfung der Läuse in Pferdebeständen: Merkblatt für die preussische Armee. Berlin, tierärztl. Wochenschr., XXXI. 547; abstract Rev. Applied EntomoL, ser. B, Med. and Vet., IV. 10. [Remedies: 1. Mercurial ointment, with or without oil or soft soap, brushed on. 2. Tobacco infusion 1: 25 or 30 (poisonous). 3. Petroleum and methylated spirit (1: 10) or petroleum and rapeseed oil (1: 1). 4. 3 % cresolsoap solution. 5. Sabadilla vinegar (1: 20, poisonous; apply only on infested spots). 6. Fish-oil, apply as under 5. 7. Wash with soapy water and while damp dust on and brush in fine ashes of beech or peat. 8. Arsenic in obstinate cases. Repeat treatment at 5-day intervals.] R.K.Google Scholar

Olitsky, P. K., Denzer, B. S. and Husk, C. S. (27. 05. 1916), The etiology of typhus fever in Mexico (tabardillo). Prel. communication. Journ. American Med. Assoc., LXVI. 1692–3. [Cultures from patients and lice taken from them yielded Bacillus typhi-exanthematici.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppenheim, H. (20. 02. 1908), Zur Therapie der Phthiriasis. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XXXIV. 332–3. Ph.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppenheim, M. (1901), Ueber einen von Pediculus pubis gebildeten Farbstoff. Arch. f. Dermatol. u. Syph., Wien u. Leipzig, LVII. 235–244, 1 Pl. [i.c.] Ph.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppenheim, M. (1901 a), Ueber einen von Pediculus pubis gebildeten Farbstoff. Author's abstract in Verhandl. d. Gesellsch. deutscher Naturf. u. Aerzte, LXXIII., Part II., Med. Abt., p. 451. Ph.Google Scholar

Orticoni, (17. 04. 1915), Prophylaxie du typhus exanthématique, precédé de destruction rapide des poux de corps. Paris Med., XV., Nos. 49–50, pp. 480–1. K.Google Scholar

Ory, E. (1879), Phthiriase. N. Dict. de Méd. et Chir. prat., Paris, XXVII. 212–215. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar

Osborn, H. (1891), The Pediculi and Mallophaga affecting man and the lower animals. U.S. Dept. Agric., Div. of EntomoL, Bull., No. 7, 56 pp., 42 Figs. [pp. 7–10, Figs. 1–4, lice infesting man.] O.Google Scholar

Osborn, H. (12. 1891), Origin and development of the parasitic habit in Mallophaga and Pediculidae. Insect Life, Washington, IV. 187–191. [Merely speculative.] B.Google Scholar

Osborn, H. (1896), Insects affecting domestic animals etc. U.S. Dept. Agric., Div. of Entomol., n.s., Bull. 5, 302 pp., 170 Figs. [pp. 165–168, Figs. 94–97. Same as Osborn, 1891, q.v.] O.Google Scholar

Osler, W. (1892), The Principles and Practice of Medicine. New York: D. Appleton and Co. [Lice, pp. 15, 1048, brief mention of effects they produce.] D.Google Scholar

Paneth, L. (11. 06. 1916), Züchtung des Bacterium typhi-exanthematici nach Plotz, Olitzky and Baehr. Med. Klinik, No. 24, pp. 647–8. [Rev. in Trop. Dis. Bull., VIII. 486. Contents indicated in the title.] D.Google Scholar

Panzer, G. W. F.. (1795), Faunae insectorum Germanicae initia, oder Deutschlands Inseclen. Nürnberg. [Pediculus includes Mallophaga; cited by Denny, 1842.] S.Google Scholar

Patton, W. S. and Cragg, F. W. (1913), A Text-book of Medical Entomology. London, Madras and Calcutta: Christian Lit. Soo. for India, xxxiv + 764 pp., 89 Pls. [pp. 527–564, Pls. 66–71, Anoplura; pp. 531–541, P. vestimenti, structure of mouthparts; pp. 545–6, Pediculus and Phthirus; pp. 551–563, anatomy and biology of P. vestimenti.] A.B.I.Google Scholar

Paul, M. E. (27. 11. 1897), A caution against the use of kerosene in the treatment of pediculosis capitis. Lancet, II. 1385. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paullini, C. F. (1706), Sudor pedicularis, post mortem. In his Obs. med. -phys., 12°, Lips., 398–402. [i.c.] D.Google Scholar

Pawlowsky, E. (1906), Ueber den Stech- und Saugapparat der Pediculiden. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Insektenbiol., II. 156–162, 198–204, Figs. 1–13. A.Google Scholar

Pawlowsky, E. N. (1907). [Anatomy of sexual organs of P. capitis and P. vestimenti.] Horae Soc. Entomol. Rossicae, St. Petersburg, XXXVIII. 82–108, Pls. II.–VI. A.I.Google Scholar

Payne, J. F. (1890), Maculae caeruleae and other symptoms produced by Pediculi pubis. Brit. Journ. Dermatol., London, II. 209–212. Also, transl., in Monatschr. f. prakt. Dermatol., Hamburg, XI. 388–392. Ph.Google Scholar