Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-03T23:56:48.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community relations of Silurian crinoids at Dudley, England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Rodney Watkins  and
John M. Hurst
Rodney Watkins
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
John M. Hurst
Affiliation:
Gr⊘nlands Geologiske Unders⊘gelse, ⊘ster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 K⊘benhavn K, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Silurian crinoids reached maximum abundance on shallow shelf bottoms of skeletal-rich carbonate. In-place crinoid preservation in the Wenlock Limestone of Dudley, England, provides a community model for these occurrences, showing a pattern among crinoids of high taxonomic diversity, conspecific clustering, relatively robust morphology, and numerical dominance of other invertebrates. Densities of about 40 crinoid individuals per m2 occupied a feeding level between 10 cm and 1 m above the bottom and may have effected trophic control over other fauna. Beneath the crinoids lived a second level of bryozoa, a third level of tabulates, and a sparse fauna of brachiopods and other solitary organisms. Crinoids also exercised significant biologic control of substrate. In contrast to the Dudley assemblage, Silurian communities of terrigenous, soft-bottom environments contained crinoids of low abundance, low taxonomic diversity, and small size. In the terrigenous communities, crinoids appear to have had no major effect on either trophic structure or substrate. High sedimentation rates limited the role of crinoids in such communities, and the dominant organisms were deposit feeders and solitary, low-level suspension feeders.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Spring 1977 , pp. 207 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abbott, B. M. 1975. Implications for the fossil record of modern carbonate bank corals. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 86:203–204.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1890–92. British fossil crinoids. Annu. Mag. Nat. Hist. 6:222–235; 7:35–40; 7:389–413; 9:189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowsher, A. L. 1955. Origin and adaptation of platyceratid gastropods. Univ. Kans. Paleontol. Contrib. Mollusca 5:1–11.Google Scholar
Breimer, A. 1969. A contribution to the paleoecology of Paleozoic stalked crinoids. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Proc. (Series B) 72:139–150.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1966. Functional morphology of Calceocrinidae with description of some new species. J. Paleontol. 40:613–634.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1973. Crinoids from the Girardeau Limestone (Ordovician). Palaeontogr. Am. 7:263–499.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1975. Silurian crinoids from the Pentland Hills, Scotland. Palaeontology. 18:631–656.Google Scholar
Butler, A. J. 1939. The stratigraphy of the Wenlock Limestone of Dudley. Q. J. Geol. Soc. London. 95:37–74.Google Scholar
Cain, J. D. B. 1968. Aspects of the depositional environment and palaeoecology of crinoidal limestones. Scottish J. Geol. 4:191–208.Google Scholar
Calef, C. E. and Hancock, N. J. 1974. Wenlock and Ludlow marine communnities of Wales and the Welsh Borderland. Palaeontology. 17:779–810.Google Scholar
Crowley, D. J. 1973. Middle Silurian patch reefs in Gasport Member (Lockport Formation), New York. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 75:283–300.Google Scholar
Fell, H. B. 1966. Ecology of crinoids. pp. 49–62. In: Boolootian, R. A., ed. Physiology of Echinodermata. 822 pp.Interscience; New York.Google Scholar
Hurst, J. M. 1975. Wenlock carbonate level-bottom brachiopod dominated communities from Wales and the Welsh Borderland. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 17:227–255.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1963. The Berkeley crinoid collection from Crawfordsville, Indiana. J. Paleontol. 37:1001–1008.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1973. Paleontology and paleoecology of the Crawfordsville fossil site (Upper Osagian: Indiana). Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci. 99:1–141.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, H. A. 1948. Biostratigraphic studies of the Niagaran interreef formations in northeastern Illinois. Ill. State Mus. Sci. Pap. 4:1–146.Google Scholar
Macurda, D. B. 1976. Skeletal modifications related to food capture and feeding behavior of the basketstar Astrophyton. Paleobiology. 2:1–7.Google Scholar
Macurda, D. B. and Meyer, D. L. 1974. Feeding posture of modern, stalked crinoids. Nature. 247:394–396.Google Scholar
Madeley, W. 1891. On crinoids. Midl. Nat. 14:181–185.Google Scholar
Manten, A. A. 1971. Palaeoecology of Silurian crinoids of Gotland. Palaeogeogr., Paleoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 7:171–184.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L. and Lane, N. G. 1976. The feeding behavior of some Paleozoic crinoids and recent basketstars. J. Paleontol. 50:472–480.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A Natural History of the Crinoidea or Lilly-Shaped Animals. 150 pp. Bryan and Co.; Bristol.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1967. British Silurian cystoids. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Geol. 13:297–355.Google Scholar
Perkins, R. D. and Enos, P. 1968. Hurricane Betsy in the Florida-Bahama area. Geologic effects and comparison with Hurricane Donna. J. Geol. 76:710–717.Google Scholar
Philcox, M. E. 1970. Geometry and evolution of the Palisades reef complex, Silurian of Iowa. J. Sed. Petrol. 40:171–183.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1838. Silurian encrinites. pp. 670–675. In: Murchison, R. I., ed. The Silurian System, Part 2. 768 pp.John Murray; London.Google Scholar
Ramsbottom, W. H. C. 1950. A new species of Lyriocrinus from the Wenlock Limestone. Annu. Mag. Nat. Hist. 12:651–656.Google Scholar
Ramsbottom, W. H. C. 1951. Two species of Gissocrinus from the Wenlock Limestone. Annu. Mag. Nat. Hist. 12:490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsbottom, W. H. C. 1952. Calceocrinidae from the Wenlock Limestone of Dudley. Bull. Geol. Surv. G.B. 4:33–46.Google Scholar
Ramsbottom, W. H. C. 1958. British Upper Silurian crinoids from the Ludlovian. Palaeontology. 1:106–115.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1873. A Catalogue of the Collection of Cambrian and Silurian Fossils contained in the Geological Museum of the University of Cambridge. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1914–40. British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. 540 pp. Palaeontogr. Soc. Monogr.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1926. American Silurian crinoids. Smithson. Inst. Spec. Publ. 2871:1–239.Google Scholar
Textoris, D. A. and Carozzi, A. V. 1964. Petrography and evolution of Niagaran (Silurian) reefs, Indiana. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 48:397–426.Google Scholar
Tipper, J. C. 1975. Lower Silurian animal communities—three case histories. Lethaia. 8:287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, R. 1977. Benthic community organization in the Ludlow Series of the Welsh Borderland. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Geol. 27. In Press.Google Scholar