Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:45:04.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rediscovery of a rare Indian turtle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

B. Groombridge ,
E.O. Moll  and
J. Vijaya
B. Groombridge
Affiliation:
Conservation Monitoring Centre. 219(c) Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK.
E.O. Moll
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology. Eastern Illinois University. Charleston. Illinois 61920, USA.
J. Vijaya
Affiliation:
Madras Crocodile Bank, Vadanemmeli Village. Perur Post Office, Mahabalipuram Road, Chingleput District. Tamil Nadu. India.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

While information was being gathered for Part 1 of the new IUCN Amphibia-Reptiha Red Data Book, dealing with crocodilians and chelonians (Groombridge, 1982), it became evident that one small terrestrial emydid turtle, Heosemys silvatica, was known to science by only two museum specimens, both collected i n 1911 in hill rain forest in south-west India (Henderson, 1912). The apparent rarity of the species, and the extent to which rain forests in south-west India have been destroyed or modified, led to concern for the species's survival and made a survey of the type locality a matter of priority. The species was included, with ‘Indeterminate’ status, in the new Red Data Book. This paper is a pre liminary report of a brief field survey initiated by the first author and carried out between 26 October and 5 November 1982.

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 1983 , pp. 130 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1983

References

Groombridge, B. 1982. The IUCN Amphibia-Reptilia Red Data Book. Part 1. Testudines, Crocodylia. Rhynchocephalia. IUCN. Gland (Switzerland).Google Scholar
Henderson, J. R. 1912. Preliminary note on a new tortoise from south India. Rec. Indian Mus. 7, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, M. S. (Ed.) 1974. Ecology and biogeography in India. Monographiae Biologicae 23. W. Junk. The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, S. B. 1964. Partition of the genus Clemmys and related problems in the taxonomy of the aquatic Testudinidae. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 143 (2). 239–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, E. O.Matson, K. E. and Krehbiel, E. B. 1981. Sexual and seasonal dichromatism in the Asian river turtle Callagur borneoensis. Herpetologica 37 (4). 181–194.Google Scholar
Morris, B. 1982. Forest Traders. A Socio-economic study of the Hill Pandaram. London School of Economics Monographs on Social Anthropology, No. 35. Athlone Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Pillai, R.S. 1982. In litt. 25 February.Google Scholar
Saharia, V. B. 1981. Wildlife in India. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.Google Scholar
Thurston, E. 1913. The Madras Presidency, with Mysore. Coorg and the Associated States. In series. Provincial Geographies of India. (Ed. Holland, T.H.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thurston, E. and Rangachari, K. 1909. Castes and Tribes of Southern India. Vol. VII. Government Press, Madras.Google Scholar
Udvardy, M. 1975. A classification of the biogeographical provinces of the world. IUCN Occasional Paper No. 18.Google Scholar
Vijaya, J. 1982. Rediscovery of the Forest Cane Turtle (Heosemys silvatica) of Kerala. Hamadryad 7 (3). 2–3.Google Scholar
Vijayan, V. S. 1978. Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary and its adjacent areas. J. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 75 (3). 888–900.Google Scholar
Whitaker, R. 1982. Introduction: aims and objectives of the Snake Specialist Group. Proceedings of the IUCN/SSC Snake Group. First Meeting. 8–12 November 1982. pp. 1–4.Google Scholar