Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:30:41.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unpacking the Musical and Technical Innovation of Knut Wiggen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2018

Jøran Rudi
Jøran Rudi*
Affiliation:
Norwegian Center for Technology in Music and the Arts (NOTAM), Sandakerveien 24D, bygg F3, N-0473 Oslo, Norway
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Knut Wiggen (1927–2016) is not a household name in music technology, despite the fact that he developed cutting-edge technology during the 1960s and early 1970s in Stockholm, as leader of both the concert organisation Fylkingen and the Electronic Music Studio (EMS). In the international literature on computer music, this development has only been mentioned in passing, if at all. However, EMS and the general development has been discussed in Scandinavian texts,1 but the links between Knut Wiggen’s technical achievements and his far-reaching ambitions for the music of the future, and how this vision aligned with philosophy and research at the time, have not been the focus. Hartenstein (2011) provides insights into Wiggen’s personal intentions and philosophy, and does not go much into technical detail, Groth (2010) focuses principally on the politics and aesthetic differences and subsequent conflicts at EMS, and although an overview of the EMS technology is provided, it is not always made clear how innovative it was. In Broman (2007), the broader lines of electroacoustic musical development are in focus.

Wiggen combined social and political concerns with technical insight, and his overarching conviction of how a new art was necessary as a counterweight to mute consumerism is unique in computer music. The aim of this article is to describe and explain the coherency of Wiggen’s achievements, his philosophy, his use of current technological advances and research and his development of a new method for composing the music of the future. In order to support this focus, mainly primary sources have been used,2 however, the literature mentioned above has been consulted due to its use of interview data and other personal communication not commonly available. A degree of duplication of information has been required for the narrative not to suffer.

The article will show that Wiggen was a visionary pioneer who has a natural place among such computer music luminaries as Max Mathews, Jean-Claude Risset, John Chowning, Iannis Xenakis, Peter Zinovieff and others from the same generation.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 23 , Special Issue 2: New Wor(l)ds for Old Sounds , August 2018 , pp. 195 - 207
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The texts are Broman (2007), Groth (2010) and Hartenstein (2011). Derivations of Groth’s texts have been printed in Ørum and Olsson (2016) and need not be discussed further here, but it should be mentioned that Groth’s PhD was published by Kehrer Verlag in 2014 (Groth 2014).

2

The author has had access to Wiggen’s archive, where much unpublished material is now located at the National Library of Norway.

References

Bækkelund, K. 1972. Provo-musiker slår til. Dagbladet, 18 May.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, J. 1973. A Comparison of Electronic Sound (Music) Synthesis Systems for Musical Composition in the United States and Europe. Unpublished text, copy at the National Library of Norway.Google Scholar
Bodin, L.-G. 2008. Öppet brev til Per-Olov Broman. Nutida Musik 3/2008: 32–33.Google Scholar
Broman, P.-O. 2007. Kort historik över Framtidens musik: Elektronmusiken och framtidstanken i svenskt 1950- och 60-tal. Stockholm: Gidlunds Förlag.Google Scholar
Chadabe, J. 1997. Electric Sound. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Chowning, J. M. 1971. The Simulation of Moving Sound Sources. Journal of Audio Engineering Society 19(1): 2–6.Google Scholar
EMS-information 1970. No. 1, December.Google Scholar
Groth, S. K. 2010. To musikkulturer – én institution. Forskningsstrategier og text-ljudkompositioner ved det svenske elektronmusikstudie EMS i 1960erne og 1970ere. PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Groth, S. K. 2014. Politics and Aesthetics in Electronic Musik. A Study of EMS- Elektronmusikstudion Stockholm, 1964–79. Heidelberg: Kehrer Verlag.Google Scholar
Hartenstein, T. 2011. Maskinsång från världens största instrument. In P. Bäckström and B. Børset (eds.) Norsk avant-garde. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Hiller, L. 1970. Music Composed with Computers – A Historical Survey. In H. B. Lincoln (ed.) The Computer and Music. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hultberg, T. (ed.) 1994. Fylkingen, Ny musik och intermediakonst. Stockholm: Fylkingen Förlag.Google Scholar
Hurum, H. J. 1973. Elektrofoni – vår chanse. Interview with Knut Wiggen. Aftenposten, 17 February.Google Scholar
Karlsson, E. M. 1994. När cirkeln nästan slöts. In T. Hultberg (ed.) Fylkingen. Stockholm: Fylkingen Förlag.Google Scholar
Manning, P. 1993. Electronic and Computer Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mathews, M. and Moore, R. 1970. GROOVE: A Program to Compose, Store, and Edit Function of Time. Communications of the ACM 13(12): 715–721.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. 1967. The Medium is the Massage. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Parmerud, Å. 1994. Något om Fylkingen, teknologi och olika sätt att se på saker…. In T. Hultberg (ed.) Fylkingen. Stockholm: Fylkingen Förlag.Google Scholar
Paus 1965. Sverige före med musik ur datamaskiner. Dagens Nyheter, 23 May.Google Scholar
Pioneren fra Buvika 2017. Concert programme from 29 January, Trondheim, Ringve Musikkmuseum.Google Scholar
Proceedings from the UNESCO Conference Music and Technology 1971. Paris, La Revue Musicale.Google Scholar
Puckette, M. 1988. The Patcher. Proceedings of the ICMC . San Francisco: ICMA.Google Scholar
Puckette, M. 2002. Max at Seventeen. Computer Music Journal 26(4): 31–43.Google Scholar
Risset, J.-C. 1971. Synthesis of Sound by Computer and Problems concerning Timbre. Music and Technology Proceedings. Paris, La Revue Musicale.Google Scholar
Rudi, J. Forthcoming. The Musical Imagination of Knut Wiggen. In K. Hagan and M. Puckette (eds.) On Music Analysis.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 1966. Traité des objets musicaux. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 1971. Music and Computers. Proceedings from the UNESCO Conference Music and Technology. Paris, La Revue Musicale.Google Scholar
Snow, C. P. 1959. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strömberg, M. 1994. Finns musikens helvete i Cyberspace? Aftonbladet, 22 September.Google Scholar
Wiggen, K. n.d. Home page. www.knut-wiggen.com (accessed 10 February 2017).Google Scholar
Wiggen, K. 1962. Stockholmsstudion för elektronisk musik. National Library, Wiggen archive, box 12.Google Scholar
Wiggen, K. 1966. Visioner av nuet. Conference programme note, 19–25 June.Google Scholar
Wiggen, K. 1970. Den musikaliska bakgrunden för datamusiken. Prisma 4(2): 41–64.Google Scholar
Wiggen, K. 1971. De två musikkulturerna. Stockholm: Sveriges Radios förlag.Google Scholar
Wiggen, K. 1972. The Electronic Music Studio at Stockholm. Its Development and Construction. Interface 1(2): 127–165.Google Scholar
Wiggen, K. 2004. Musikkens psykiske fundament. Fredrikstad: Paradigma forlag.Google Scholar
Ørum, T. and Olsson, J. 2016. A Cultural History of the Avant-Garde in the Nordic Countries 1950–1975. Leiden: Brill Rodolpi.Google Scholar