Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:42:15.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Composing the Context: Considerations on materially mediated electronic musicianship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2017

Otso Lähdeoja
Otso Lähdeoja*
Affiliation:
University of the Arts, Sibelius Academy, Helsinki, Finland
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A range of material objects can be transformed into sound emitters by the induction of audio-rate vibration with structure-borne sound drivers. The resulting acoustically activated physical objects offer the possibility to extend the compositional gesture towards the material environment, providing a literal re-reading of Schaeffer’s objet sonore concept. Engaging sound in physical objects ties the creative gesture to its surroundings, grounding the approach in an inherently situated dimension. This article examines the compositional strategies emerging from diffusing sound via physical objects, such as sound spatialisation, audiovisual sculpture and audiotactility in concert setting, illustrated by four case studies of recent aural artwork. On the basis of the case studies, the aesthetic implications of materially mediated aural art are discussed, in relation with the ideal of purity represented by the high-fidelity loudspeaker. While the technological development of the loudspeaker aims for a perfect reproduction of an idealised and autonomous sound, materially mediated sound diffusion merges sound and matter into an agglomerate where the sound can no longer be perceived as an autonomous entity, but rather in relation to its material source. Engaging electronic musicianship in materiality gives rise to a hybrid setting at the interface of the digital, the material and the human, where the context – the environment of sound-emitting objects – becomes an object of composition.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 23 , Special Issue 1: Context-based Composition , April 2018 , pp. 61 - 70
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altinsoy, M. E. 2006. Auditory-Tactile Interaction in Virtual Environments. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. 2005. Dynamic Networks of Sonic Interactions: An Interview with Agostino Di Scipio. Computer Music Journal 29(3): 11–28.Google Scholar
Basanta, A. 2014. This Machine Breathes to the Rhythms of its own Heartbeat. Composition. http://adambasanta.com/projects/machine-breaths-rhythms-heartbeat/ (accessed May 2016).Google Scholar
Bastien, P. 2016. www.pierrebastien.com/en/installations.php.Google Scholar
Berliner, P. F. 2009. Thinking in Jazz: The Infinite Art of Improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cadoz, C. 1999. Musique, geste, technologie. In H. Genevois and R. De Vivo (eds.) Les nouveaux gestes de la musique. Marseille: Parenthèses.Google Scholar
Di Scipio, A. 2003. Sound is the Interface: From Interactive to Ecosystemic Signal Processing. Organised Sound 8(3): 269–277.Google Scholar
Driscoll, J. and Rogalsky, M. 2004. David Tudor’s Rainforest: An Evolving Exploration of Resonance. Leonardo Music Journal 14: 25–30.Google Scholar
Godøy, R. I. 2006. Gestural-Sonorous Objects: Embodied Extensions of Schaeffer’s Conceptual Apparatus. Organised Sound 11(2): 149–157.Google Scholar
Harker, A. and Tremblay, P. A. 2012. The HISSTools Impulse Response Toolbox: Convolution for the Masses. Proceedings of the 2012 International Computer Music Conference. Ljubljana, Slovenia: ICMA.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. 1998. Sound, Space, Sculpture: Some Thoughts on the ‘What’, ‘How’ and ‘Why’ of Sound Diffusion. Organised Sound 3(2): 117–127.Google Scholar
Hautamäki, J. 2010–15. www.jukkahautamaki.com.Google Scholar
Hultberg, T. 1988. An Interview with David Tudor by T. Hultberg. http://davidtudor.org/Articles/hultberg.htm (accessed May 2016).Google Scholar
Lähdeoja, O. 2015. An Augmented Guitar with Active Acoustics. Proceedings of the 2015 Sound and Music Computing Conference. Maynooth, Ireland: SMCNetwork.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leman, M. 2008. Embodied Music Cognition and Mediation Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maigret, N. and Montgermont, N. 2009–13. The Resonant Architecture Project. http://resonantarchitecture.com (accessed May 2016).Google Scholar
Manovich, L. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Merchel, S., Altinsoy, M.E. and Stamm, M. 2012. Touch the Sound: Audio-Driven Tactile Feedback for Audio Mixing Applications. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 60(1/2): 47–53.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 2010. Stuff. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. 2008. RondóHaP. Composition. http://josuemoreno.eu/project/rondohap/ (accessed May 2016).Google Scholar
Mumma, G. 2006. Liner notes to Rainforest by Gordon Mumma. New World Records 80651, David Tudor & Gordon Mumma. www.newworldrecords.org/uploads/fileAdomv.pdf (accessed May 2016).Google Scholar
Nemtsov, S. 2013. Running out of Tune. Composition. www.sarah-nemtsov.de/works_e.htm (accessed May 2016).Google Scholar
Nettl, B. and Russell, M. (eds.) 1998. In the Course of Performance: Studies in the World of Musical Improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Novakova, L. and Lähdeoja, O. 2013. O V A L. Audio-visual Installation. www.lenkanovak.com/works/o-v-a-l-2/ (accessed May 2016).Google Scholar
Overholt, D., Berdahl, E. and Hamilton, R. 2011. Advancements in Actuated Musical Instruments. Organised Sound 16(2): 154–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partti, H. and Karlsen, S. 2010. Reconceptualising Musical Learning: New Media, Identity and Community in Music Education. Music Education Research 12(4): 369–382.Google Scholar
Platz, R. 2014. Closed Loop. Composition. http://brahms.ircam.fr/works/work/31707/ (accessed May 2016).Google Scholar
Pook, L. and Clauss, J. 2003. Stimuline, Audio-Tactile Concert – Installation: www.bipolar-production.com/stimuline-pook-clauss/?lang=en (accessed May 2016).Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 1966. Traité des objets musicaux. Paris: Edition du Seuil.Google Scholar
Sterne, J. 2014. Music as a Media Problem: Some Comments and Approaches. Repercussions 11. www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~repercus/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/repercussions-Vol.-11-Sterne-Jonathan-Music-as-a-Media-Problem.pdf (accessed May 2016).Google Scholar
Szendy, P. 2002. Membres Phantomes des corps musiciens. Paris: Editions du Minuit.Google Scholar
Vaggione, H. 1991. On Object-Based Composition. Journal of New Music Research 20(3–4): 209–216.Google Scholar
Vaggione, H. 1998. L’espace composable. Sur quelques catégories opératoires dans la musique électroacoustique. L’espace, musique/philosophie. Paris: Archives Karéline.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. [1963] 1992. Formalized Music. Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon Press.Google Scholar