Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:21:38.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between Szőke’s Sound Microscope and Messiaen’s Organ: The cultural realities of blackcap song

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2018

Gergely Loch
Gergely Loch*
Affiliation:
Department of Musicology, Liszt Academy of Music, Liszt Ferenc tér 8., 1061 Budapest, Hungary
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The song of the blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla) has been a subject of fascination among Europeans for centuries. In the first half of the article, I present factors that influenced the evaluation of the bird’s song between the seventeenth and early twentieth centuries, and dedicate the second half to developments in the past sixty years. In the 1950s, two mutually exclusive interpretations of the bird’s song appeared: one connected to Péter Szőke and his sound microscope and the other to Olivier Messiaen and his organ. I draw a parallel between this duality and the ‘sound-based’–‘note-based’ dichotomy that has been naturalised in the discourse about sonic culture during the last decade. I examine what this dichotomy and the natural experience of the blackcap’s song can reveal about one other, shedding light on what may be viewed as the most influential source for this centuries-long fascination.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 23 , Special Issue 2: New Wor(l)ds for Old Sounds , August 2018 , pp. 144 - 155
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersson, F. 2016. Åke Hodell’s Kerberos – A Case Study. In T. Ørum and J. Olsson (eds.) A Cultural History of the Avant-Garde in the Nordic Countries 1950–1975. Leiden: Brill Rodopi.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 2002. Historia Animalium, I: Text, ed. D. M. Balme. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 2007. Birds in the Ancient World from A to Z. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barrington, D. 1773. Experiments and Observations on the Singing of Birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 63: 249–291.Google Scholar
Béldi, M. 1980. Madárhatározó. Romániai Szocialista Köztársaság madarai. Kolozsvár-Napoca: Dacia Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Belon, P. 1555. L’Histoire de la nature des oyseaux. Paris: G. Cavellat.Google Scholar
Bertha, B. 1992. Egy író állatkertje. Budapest: Schenk Verlag.Google Scholar
Boev, Z. 2006. Early Pleistocene Avifauna of Kunino (NW Bulgaria). Historia naturalis bulgarica 17: 125–132.Google Scholar
Böhme, H. 2005. The Metaphysics of Phenomena: Telescope and Microscope in the Works of Goethe, Leeuwenhoek and Hooke. In H. Schramm, L. Schwarte and J. Lazardzig (eds.) Collection–Laboratory–Theater. Scenes of Knowledge in the 17th Century . Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bolton, J. 1830. Harmonia Ruralis, or, An Essay Towards a Natural History of British Song Birds. London: Simpkin and Marshall.Google Scholar
Börjesson, S. 2002. Fågelmusik. Ett tema med variotioner. Stockholm: Atlantis.Google Scholar
Brehm, A. 1929–33. Az állatok világa. Átd., az új felfedezésekkel és magyar vonatkozásokkal kieg. új kiad, Vol. IX. Budapest: Gutenberg.Google Scholar
Brehm, A. E. 1865. Illustrirtes Thierleben. Dritter Band. Zweite Abtheilung: Die Vögel. Erste Hälfte: Knacker und Sänger. Hildburghausen: Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar
Brehm, Ch. L. 1832. Handbuch für den Liebhaber der Stuben-, Haus- und aller Zähmung werthen Vögel. Ilmenau: Berhnard Friedrich Voigt.Google Scholar
Brochet, A.-L., Van Den Bossche, W., Jbour, S., Ndang’ Ang’a, P. K., Jones, V. R., Abdou, W. A. L. I. et al. 2016. Preliminary Assessment of the Scope and Scale of Illegal Killing and Taking of Birds in the Mediterranean. Bird Conservation International 26(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Brunson, W. 2009. Text-Sound Composition – The Second Generation. www.ems-network.org/ems09/papers/brunson.pdf (accessed 27 August 2017).Google Scholar
de Buffon, G.-L. L. 1778. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière. Tome Vingtième. Paris: Imprimerie Royal.Google Scholar
Buhle, Ch. A. A. 1831. Die Naturgeschichte in getreuen Abbildungen und mit ausführlicher Beschreibung derselben. Vögel. Halberstadt, Pesth: Carl Brüggemann, Otto Wigand.Google Scholar
Burroughs, J. 1884. The Writings of John Burroughs. Vol. VI. Fresh Fields. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. and Rogalsky, M. 2017. A Day in Algonquin Park: William W. H. Gunn and the Circadian Audio Portrait. Organised Sound 22(2): 206–216.Google Scholar
Coppola, A. 2013. ‘Without the Help of Glasses’: The Anthropocentric Spectacle of Nehemiah Grew’s Botany. The Eighteenth Century 54(2): 263–277.Google Scholar
Cramer, J. S. (ed.) 2007. I to Myself: An Annotated Selection from the Journal of Henry D. Thoreau. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Crespon, J. 1840. Ornithologie du Gard et des pays circonvoisins. Nismes, Montpellier: Bianquis-Gignoux, Castel.Google Scholar
Fallon, R. 2007. The Record of Realism in Messiaen’s Bird Style. In Ch. Dingle and N. Simeone (eds.) Olivier Messiaen: Music, Art and Literature. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Gessner, C. 1555. Historiae Animalium Liber III. qui est de Avium natura. Tiguri [Zürich]: apud Christoph[orum] Froschoverum [Christoph Froschauer].Google Scholar
Grainger, P. A. 1938. 1996. Free Music. Leonardo Music Journal 6: 109.Google Scholar
Herman, O. 1901. 1908. A madarak hasznáról és káráról . Budapest: Királyi Magyar Természettudományi Társulat.Google Scholar
Hudson, W. H. 1895. 1921. British Birds . London and New York: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Hultberg, T. 1999. Öyvind Fahlström on the Air – Manipulating the World. Stockholm: Sveriges Radios Förlag, Fylkingen.Google Scholar
Hultsch, H. 1980. Beziehungen zwischen Struktur, zeitlicher Variabilität und sozialem Einsatz des Gesangs der Nachtigall (Luscinia megarhynchos B.). Doctoral dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. E. 1976. Fågelsång. In Hans Åstrand (ed.) Sohlmans musiklexikon Vol. III. Stockholm: Sohlmans Förlag.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. E. 1994. P2-fågeln november: Svarthättan, Sveriges Radio P2, 31 October, 12:00.Google Scholar
Knight, Ch. and Long, G. (eds.) 1835. Penny Cyclopedia, Vol. III. London: Charles Knight.Google Scholar
Landy, L. 2007. Understanding the Art of Sound Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Landy, L. 2017. But is it (Also) Music? In M. Cobussen, V. Meelberg and B. Truax (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Sounding Art. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lázár, K. 1866. A lég urai. Pest: Emich Gusztáv.Google Scholar
Linné, C. 1758. Systema Naturae. Editio decima, reformata. Stockholm: imp. Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar
Mathevon, N. and Aubin, T. 2001. Sound-Based Species-Specific Recognition in the Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla Shows High Tolerance to Signal Modifications. Behaviour 138(4): 511–524.Google Scholar
Messiaen, O. 1999. Traité de rythme, de couleur, et d’ornitologie (1949–1992) en sept tomes. Tom 5/1: Chants d’oiseaux d’Europe. Paris, Leduc.Google Scholar
Mullarney, K., Svensson, L. and Zetterström, D. 2009. Fågelguiden. [Stockholm]: Bonnier Fakta.Google Scholar
N. N. 1857. Nightingale. In J. M. Wilson (ed.) The Rural Cyclopedia, or a General Dictionary of Agriculture. Vol. III. Edinburgh: Fullarton and Co.Google Scholar
N. N. 2009. P2-fågeln – en historik. http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=3275&artikel=2592137 (accessed 28 January 2017).Google Scholar
N. N. 2010. Bengt Emil Johnson har avlidit. Svenska Dagbladet, 15 July. www.svd.se/bengt-emil-johnson-har-avlidit (accessed 30 January 2017).Google Scholar
Newman, E. 1849. The Letters of Rusticus on the Natural History of Godalming. London: John van Voorst.Google Scholar
Никонов, Н. 1973. Певчие птицы. Свердловск: Средне-Уральское Книжное Издательство.Google Scholar
Olina, G. P. 1622. Uccelliera. Roma: Apresso Andrea Fei.Google Scholar
Péteri, L. 2007. Zene, oktatás, tudomány, politika. Kodály és az államszocializmus művelődéspolitikája (1948–1967). Forrás 39(12): 45–63.Google Scholar
Plinius Secundus, C. 1892–1909. Naturalis historiae. Libri XXXVII. post Ludovici Iani obitum , ed. C. Mayhoff Leipzig: Teubner Verlag.Google Scholar
Rausch, M. 1900. Die gefiederten Sängerfürsten des europäischen Festlandes. Magdeburg: Creutzsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Riedel, W. 1833. Die Grasmücken und Nachtigallen in Europa. Nördlingen: Karl Heinrich Beck.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. 1981. Madárdal erdőn-mezőn. Debrecen: Natura.Google Scholar
Secora Pearl, J. 2006. Eavesdropping with a Master: Leoš Janáček and the Music of Speech. Empirical Musicology Review 1(2): 131–165.Google Scholar
Serflek, Gy., Rosta, K. and Erdei, F. 1954–55. [Four letters to Péter Szőke about his time off at the Ministry of Agriculture (18 January 1954, 20 March 1954, 28 December 1954, 31 October 1955)]. Hungarian National Library, Manuscriptorium, Fond 448.Google Scholar
Shirihai, H., Gargallo, G. and Helbig, A. J. 2001. Sylvia Warblers. Identification, Taxonomy and Phylogeny of the Genus Sylvia. London: Helm.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1986. Spectro-Morphology and Structuring Processes. In S. Emmerson (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Springer, K. B. and Kinzelbach, R. K. 2008. Das Vogelbuch von Conrad Gessner (1516–1565). Ein Archiv für avifaunistische Daten. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Syme, P. 1823. A Treatise on British Song-Birds. Edinburgh: John Anderson.Google Scholar
Szőke, P. 1959. A melódia belső fejlődésének dialektikája, a népzenék sokféleségének egysége, 2 vols. Budapest: Zeneműkiadó.Google Scholar
Szőke, P. 1962. Juliánusz barát és összehasonlító népzenekutatásunk. Magyar Zene 3(2): 218–233.Google Scholar
Szőke, P. 1978. Ember előtti zene. Művészet 19(6): 18–21.Google Scholar
Szőke, P. 1982. A zene eredete és három világa. Budapest: Magvető.Google Scholar
Szőke, P. 1990. Megoldhatatlan-e a zene eredetének a művészet látóhatárán túl rejtőző évszázados titka? Magyar Tudomány 97(6): 659–688.Google Scholar
Szőke, P., Gunn, W. W. H. and Filip, M. 1969. The Musical Microcosm of the Hermit Thrush. Studia Musicologica 11(1): 423–438.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. 2017. Is Birdsong Music? Outback Encounters with an Australian Songbird. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Vaillant, A. 2010. Modernité, subjectivation littéraire et figure auctoriale. Romantisme 40(2): 11–25.Google Scholar
Valli da Todi, A. 1601. Il canto de gl’augelli. Roma: per gli heredi di Nicolo Mutij.Google Scholar
Voigt, A. 1894. 1933. Excursionsbuch zum Studium der Vogelstimmen. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar

DISCOGRAPHY

Fassett, J. H. and Kellogg, P. P. 1953. Music and Bird Songs. LP, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology and Interactive Audio, Houghton Mifflin Company, CH 973.Google Scholar
Szőke, P. 1987. The Unknown Music of Birds (Az ismeretlen madárzene). LP, Hungaroton, LPX 19347.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Loch sound files

Sound files

Download Loch sound files(File)
File 5.6 MB