Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:24:10.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amino acid availability: aspects of chemical analysis and bioassay methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2007

Paul J. Moughan
Paul J. Moughan*
Affiliation:
Riddet Centre, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
*
Corresponding author: Dr P. J. Moughan, fax +64 6 350 5655, email P.J.Moughan@massey .ac.nz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is important to be able to characterise foods and feedstuffs according to their available amino acid contents. This involves being able to determine amino acids chemically and the conduct of bioassays to determine amino acid digestibility and availability. The chemical analysis of amino acids is not straightforward and meticulousness is required to achieve consistent results. In particular and for accuracy, the effect of hydrolysis time needs to be accounted for. Some amino acids (for example, lysine) can undergo chemical modification during the processing and storage of foods, which interferes with amino acid analysis. Furthermore, the modified amino acids may also interfere with the determination of digestibility. A new approach to the determination of available lysine using a modified in vivo digestibility assay is discussed. Research is required into other amino acids susceptible to structural damage. There is recent compelling scientific evidence that bacterial activity in the small intestine of animals and man leads to the synthesis and uptake of dietary essential amino acids. This has implications for the accuracy of the ileal-based amino acid digestibility assay and further research is required to determine the extent of this synthesis, the source of nitrogenous material used for the synthesis and the degree of synthesis net of amino acid catabolism. Although there may be potential shortcomings in digestibility assays based on the determination of amino acids remaining undigested at the terminal ileum, there is abundant evidence in simple-stomached animals and growing evidence in human subjects that faecal-based amino acid digestibility coefficients are misleading. Hindgut microbial metabolism significantly alters the undigested dietary amino acid profile. The ileal amino acid digestibility bioassay is expected to be more accurate than its faecal-based counterpart, but correction of the ileal amino acid flow for amino acids of endogenous origin is necessary. Approaches to correcting for the endogenous component are discussed.

Keywords

ProteinAmino acid availabilityLysineDigestibilityBioassays
Type
Research Article
Information
Nutrition Research Reviews , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , December 2003 , pp. 127 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2003

References

Batterham, ES (1992) Availability and utilisation of amino acids for growing pigs. Nutrition Research Reviews 5, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxter, JH (1996) Amino Acids. In Handbook of Food Analysis, pp. 197–228 [Nollet, LML editor]. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
Binder, HJ (1970) Amino acid absorption in the mammalian colon. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 219, 503–506.Google Scholar
Boisen, S & Moughan, PJ (1996) Different expressions of dietary protein and amino acid digestibility in pig feeds and their application in protein evaluation. A theoretical approach. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 46A, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorman, KN (1980) Dietary constraints on nitrogen retention. In Protein Deposition in Animals. Proceedings of the 29th Easter School in Agricultural Science, University of Nottingham, 1980, pp. 147–166 [Buttery, PJ and Lindsay, DB, editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Borgstrom, B, Dahlqvist, A, Lundh, G & Sjovall, VJ (1957) Studies of intestinal digestion and absorption in the human. Journal of Clinical Investigation 36, 1521–1536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bos, C, Mahé, S, Gaudichon, C, Benamouzig, R, Gausserès, N, Luengo, C, Ferrière, F, Rautureau, J & Tomé, D (1999) Assessment of net postprandial protein utilisation of 15 N-labelled milk nitrogen in human subjects. British Journal of Nutrition 81, 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, KJ & Booth, VH (1973) Damage to lysine in food processing: Its measurement and its significance. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 43, 423–451.Google Scholar
Chernov, AJ, Doe, WF & Gompertz, D (1972) Intrajejunal volatile fatty acids in the stagnant loop syndrome. Gut 13, 103–106.Google Scholar
Clemens, ET, Stevens, CE & Southworth, M (1975) Sites of organic acid production and pattern of digesta movement in the gastrointestinal tract of swine. Journal of Nutrition 105, 759–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coates, ME (1976) The influence of the gut microflora on digestion and absorption. In Digestion in the Fowl. Proceedings of the 11th Poultry Science Symposium Edinburgh, 1975, pp. 179–191 [Boorman, KN and Freeman, BM editors]. Edinburgh UK: British Poultry Science Ltd.Google Scholar
Cohen, Z, Wolever, TWS, Thompson, LU & Jenkins, DJA (1983) Ileal losses of carbohydrate in man. Gastroenterology 84, 1127.Google Scholar
Cole, DJA, Dean, GW & Luscombe, JR (1970) Single cereal diets for bacon pigs. 2. The effects of methods of storage and preparation of barley on performance and carcass quality. Animal Production 12, 1–6.Google Scholar
Crampton, EW & Bell, JM (1946) The effect of fineness of grinding on the utilisation of oats by market hogs. Journal of Animal Science 5, 200–210.Google Scholar
Cranwell, PD (1968) Microbial fermentation in the alimentary tract of the pig. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 38, 721–730.Google Scholar
Cuche, G & Malbert, CH (1998) Relationships between cecoileal reflux and ileal motor patterns in conscious pigs. American Journal of Physiology 274, G35–G41.Google Scholar
Danielsen, M & Jackson, AA (1992) Limits of adaptation to a diet low in protein in normal man: urea kinetics. Clinical Science 83, 103–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darragh, AJ, Cranwell, PD & Moughan, PJ (1994) Absorption of lysine and methionine from the proximal colon of the piglet. British Journal of Nutrition 71, 739–752.Google Scholar
Darragh, AJ, Garrick, DJ, Moughan, PJ & Hendriks, WH (1996) Correction for amino acid loss during hydrolysis of a purified protein. Analytical Biochemistry 236, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darragh, AJ & Moughan, PJ (1998) The amino acid composition of human milk corrected for amino acid digestibility. British Journal of Nutrition 80, 25–34.Google Scholar
Darragh, AJ, Schaafsma, G & Moughan, PJ (1998) Impact of amino acid availability on the protein digestibility corrected amino acid score. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 336, 46–50.Google Scholar
Das, M & Radhakrishnan, AN (1976) Role of peptidases and peptide transport in the intestinal absorption of proteins. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 24, 58–87.Google Scholar
Davenport, HW (1977) Physiology of the Digestive Tract, 4th ed. Chicago, IL: Year Book Medical Publisher Incorporated.Google Scholar
Dawson, AM, Holdsworth, CD & Webb, J (1964) Absorption of short chain fatty acids in man. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine 117, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Vrese, M, Frik, R, Roos, N & Hagemeister, H (2000) Protein-bound D-amino acids, and to a lesser extent lysinoalanine, decrease true ileal protein digestibility in minipigs as determined with 15 N-labelling. Journal of Nutrition 130, 2026–2031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dierick, NA, Vervaeke, I, Decuypere, J, van der Heyde, H & Henderickx, H (1988) Correlation of ileal and fecal digested protein and organic matter to production performance in growing pigs. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, European Association for Animal Production publication no. 35, pp. 50–51. Rostock, Germany: EAAP.Google Scholar
Doring, F, Walter, J, Will, J, Focking, M, Boll, M, Amasheh, S, Clauss, W & Daniel, H (1998) Delta-aminolevulinic acid transport by intestinal and renal peptide transporters and its physiological and clinical implications. Journal of Clinical Investigation 101, 2761–2767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drasar, BS & Barrow, PA (1985) Intestinal microbiology. In Aspects of Microbiology, vol. 10. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold (U.K.) Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Drasar, BS & Hill, MJ (1974) Human Intestinal Flora. New York, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Drasar, BS, Shiner, M & McLeod, MB (1969) Studies on the intestinal flora. I. The bacterial flora of the gastrointestinal tract in healthy and achlorhydric persons. Gastroenterology 56, 71–79.Google Scholar
Englyst, HN & Cummings, JH (1985) Digestion of the polysaccharides of some cereal foods in the human small intestine. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 44, 778–787.Google Scholar
Erbersdobler, H (1976) Amino acid availability. In Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, p. 139–158 [Cole, DJA, Boorman, KN, Buttery, PJ, Lewis, DNeale, RJ and Swan, H editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Evenepoel, P, Geypens, B, Luypaerts, A, Hiele, M, Ghoos, Y & Rutgeerts, P (1998) Digestibility of cooked and raw egg protein in humans as assessed by stable isotope techniques. Journal of Nutrition 128, 1716–1722.Google Scholar
Fauconneau, G & Michel, MC (1970) The Role of the Gastrointestinal Tract in the Regulation of Protein Metabolism, vol. IV, pp. 481–522. London: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Fenwick, RM, Knighton, DR & Moughan, PJ (1995) Protein quality measurement by the PDCAAS technique. IDF Nutrition Newsletter, no. 4 (IDF newsletter no. 143), pp. 40–43.Google Scholar
Finley, JW (1985) Reducing variability in amino acid analysis. In Digestibility and Amino Acid Availability in Cereals and Oilseeds, pp. 15–30 [Finley, JW and Hopkins, DT editors]. St Paul, MN: American Association of Cereal Chemists Inc.Google Scholar
Finney, DJ (1964) Statistical Method in Biological Assay, 2nd ed. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Fordtran, JS, Scroggie, WB & Polter, DE (1964) Colonic absorption of tryptophan metabolites in man. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 64, 125–132.Google Scholar
Fouillet, H, Bos, C, Gaudichon, C, Tomé, D (2002) Approaches to quantifying protein metabolism in response to nutrient ingestion. Journal of Nutrition 132, 3208S–3218S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, MF (1998) Protein and amino acid requirements. In Biochemical and Physiological Bases of Human Nutrition, pp. 287–304 [Stipanuk, MA, editor]. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders.Google Scholar
Fuller, MF & Reeds, PJ (1998) Nitrogen cycling in the gut. Annual Reviews of Nutrition 18, 385–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gargallo, J & Zimmerman, D (1981) Effect of casein and starch infusion in the large intestine on nitrogen metabolism of growing swine. Journal of Nutrition 111, 1390–1396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaudichon, C, Bos, C, Morens, C, Petzke, KJ, Mariotti, FEverwand, JBenamouzig, R, Daré, S, Tomé, D & Metges, CC (2002) Ileal losses of nitrogen and amino acids in humans and their importance to the assessment of amino acid requirements. Gastroenterology 123, 50–59.Google Scholar
Gausserès, N, Mahé, S, Benamouzig, RLuengo, CFerriere, F, Rautureau, J, Tomé, D (1997) [15N]-labeled pea flour protein nitrogen exhibits good ileal digestibility and postprandial retention in humans. Journal of Nutrition 127, 1160–1165.Google Scholar
Gehrke, CW, Wall, LL Sr, Absheer, JS, Kaiser, FE & Zumwalt, RW (1985) Sample preparation for chromatography of amino acids. Acid hydrolysis of proteins. Journal of the Association of Analytical Chemistry 68, 811–821.Google Scholar
Gibson, JA, Sladen, GE & Dawson, AM (1976) Protein absorption and ammonia production: the effects of dietary protein and removal of the colon. British Journal of Nutrition 35, 61–65.Google Scholar
Hare, PE, St John, PA, Engel, MH (1985) Ion-exchange separation of amino acids. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of Amino Acids, pp. 415–425 [Barrett, GC, editor]. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Hendriks, WH, Moughan, PJ, Boer, H & van der Poel, AFB (1994) Effects of extrusion on the dye-binding, fluorodinitrobenzene-reactive and total lysine content of soyabean meal and peas. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, WH, Tartellin, MF & Moughan, PJ (1998) The amino acid composition of cat (Felis catus) hair. Animal Science 67, 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, V, Ganier, P, Thibault, J-N & Sève, B (2000) Comparison of the isotope dilution method for determination of the ileal endogenous amino acid losses with labelled diet and labelled pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 83, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hess, V & Sève, B (1999) Effects of body weight and feed intake level on basal ileal endogenous losses in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 77, 3281–3288.Google Scholar
Hess, V, Thibault, J-N & Sève, B (1998) The 15N amino acid dilution method allows the determination of the real digestibility and of the ileal endogenous losses of the respective amino acids in pigs. Journal of Nutrition 128, 1969–1977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, MJ (1982) Gut flora associated diseases in man. Advances in Veterinary Medicine 22, 32–38.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, SM & Moughan, PJ (2000) Amino Acids – The collection of ileal digesta and characterisation of the endogenous component. In The collection of ileal digesta and characterisation of the endogenous component. In Feed Evaluation – Principles and Practice, pp .105–124 [Moughan, PJ, Verstegen, MWA and Visser-Reyneveld, M, editors]. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Pers.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, SM, Moughan, PJ, Reynolds, GW & James, KAC (2000) The effect of dietary peptide concentration on endogenous ileal amino acid loss in the growing pig. British Journal of Nutrition 83, 421–430.Google Scholar
Hodgson, ES, Horney, FD & Bayley, HS (1977) Nitrogen metabolism in pigs receiving soybean and rapeseed meal. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 57, 832 Abstr.Google Scholar
Holloway, WD, Tasman-Jones, C & Bell, E (1980) The hemicellulose component of dietary fibre. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33, 260–263.Google Scholar
Holloway, WD, Tasman-Jones, C & Lee, SP (1978) Digestion of certain fractions of dietary fibre in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 31, 927–930.Google Scholar
Holloway, WD, Tasman-Jones, C & Maher, K (1983) Pectin digestion in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 37, 253–255.Google Scholar
Holmes, JHG, Bayley, HS, Leadbeater, PA & Horney, FD (1974) Digestion of protein in small and large intestine of the pig. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 479–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horvath, DJ, Seeley, HW, Warner, RG & Loosli, JK (1958) Microflora of intestinal contents and faeces of pigs fed different diets including pigs showing parakeratosis. Journal of Animal Science 17, 714–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, RE (1978) Bacterial ecology in the small intestine. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 31, S125–S127.Google Scholar
Hurrell, RF & Carpenter, KJ (1981) The estimation of available lysine in foodstuffs. In Progress in Food and Nutritional Science, Maillard Reaction in Foods, pp. 156–176 [Eriksson, C, editor]. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hurrell, RE & Carpenter, KJ (1984) The estimation of available lysine in foodstuffs after Maillard reactions. In Nestlé Research News 1982/83, pp. 78–86 [Boella, C, editor]. Lausanne, Switzerland: Nestlé Products Technical Assistance Co Ltd Technical Documentation Centre.Google Scholar
Hurrell, RF, Carpenter, KJ, Sinclair, WJ, Otterburn, MS & Asquith, RS (1976) Mechanisms of heat damage in proteins 7. The significance of lysine-containing isopeptides and of lanthionine in heated proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 35, 383–395.Google Scholar
Istfan, N, Murray, E, Tanghorbani, M & Young, VR (1983) An evaluation of the nutritional value of a soy protein concentrate in young adult men using the short-term N-balance method. Journal of Nutrition 113, 2516–2523.Google Scholar
Jackson, AA, Doherty, J, de Benoist, MH, Hibbert, J & Persaud, C (1990) The effect of the level of dietary protein, carbohydrate and fat on urea kinetics in young children during rapid catch-up weight gain. British Journal of Nutrition 64, 371–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, PS & Smith, MW (1976) Methionine transport by pig colonic mucosa measured during early post-natal development. Journal of Physiology 262, 151–168.Google Scholar
Jensen, BB (1988) Effect of diet composition and virginiamycin on microbial activity in the digestive tract of pigs. In Digestive Physiology in the Pig, pp. 392–400 [Buraczewska, L, Buraczewska, S, Pastuzewska, B and Zebrowska, T, editors]. Jablonna, Poland: Polish Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Just, A (1980) Ileal digestibility of protein: applied aspects. In Current Concepts of Digestion and Absorption in Pigs , Proceedings of a Seminar held at the National Institute for Research in Dairying, 1979, NIRD technical bulletin no. 3, pp. 66–75 [AG Low and IG Partridge editors]. Reading, UK: National Institute for Research in Dairying.Google Scholar
Just, A, Jorgensen, H & Fernandez, JA (1981) The digestive capacity of the caecum-colon and the value of nitrogen absorbed from the hindgut for protein synthesis in pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 479–480.Google Scholar
Just, A, Jorgensen, H & Fernandez, JA (1985) Correlations of protein deposited in growing female pigs to ileal and faecal digestible crude protein and amino acids. Livestock Production Science 12, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kass, ML, Van Soest, PJ, Pond, WG, Lewis, B & McDowell, RE (1980) Utilisation of dietary fibre from alfalfa by growing swine. 1. Apparent digestibility of diet components in specific segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Animal Science 50, 175–191.Google Scholar
Keys, JE Jr & DeBarthe, JV (1974) Cellulose and hemicellulose digestibility in the stomach, small intestine and large intestine of swine. Journal of Animal Science 39, 53–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, TLJ (1967) High level cereal diets for the growing/finishing pig. 1. The effect of cereal preparation and water level on the performance of pigs fed diets containing high levels of wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science 68, 269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenis, NP (1983) Faecal amino acid digestibility in feedstuffs for pigs. In Metabolisme et Nutrition Azotes, pp. 385–389 [Arnal, M, Pion, R and Bonin, D, editors]. Paris, France: INRA.Google Scholar
Leterme, P, Monmart, T, Thewis, A & Morundi, P (1996) Effect of oral and parenteral N nutrition vs N-free nutrition on the endogenous amino acid flow at the ileum of the pig. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 71, 265–271.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lien, KA, Sauer, WC & Dugan, MER (1997) Evaluation of the 15N-isotope dilution technique for determining recovery of endogenous protein in ileal digesta of pigs: effect of the pattern of blood sampling, precursor pools and isotope dilution technique. Journal of Animal Science 75, 159–169.Google Scholar
Low, AG (1979) Studies on digestion and absorption in the intestines of growing pigs. 6. Measurements of the flow of amino acids. British Journal of Nutrition 41, 147–156.Google Scholar
Low, AG (1990) Protein evaluation in pigs and poultry. In Feedstuff Evaluation, pp. 91–114 [Wiseman, J and Cole, DJA, editors]. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, AG, Partridge, IG, Keal, HD & Jones, AR (1982) A comparison of methods in vitro and in vivo of measuring amino acid digestibility in foodstuffs as predictors of pig growth and carcass composition. Animal Production 34, 403.Google Scholar
Low, AG & Zebrowska, T (1989) Digestion in pigs. In Protein Metabolism in Farm Animals, pp. 53–121 [Bock, HD, Eggum, BO, Low, AG, Simon, O and Zebrowska, T, editors]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, GT, Cummings, JH & Allison, C (1986) Protein degradation by human intestinal bacteria. Journal of General Microbiology 132, 1647–1656.Google ScholarPubMed
McNeil, NI (1988) Nutritional implications of human and mammalian large intestinal function. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 56, 1–42.Google Scholar
Mariotti, F, Mahé, S, Benamouzig, R, Luengo, C, Daré, S, Gaudichon, C, Tomé, D (1999) Nutritional value of [15N]-soy protein isolate assessed from ileal digestibility and postprandial protein utilisation in humans. Journal of Nutrition 129, 1992–1997.Google Scholar
Mariotti, F, Pueyo, ME, Tomé, D, Mahé, S (2002) The bioavailability and postprandial utilisation of sweet lupin ( Lupinus albus )-flour protein is similar to that of purified soyabean protein in human subjects: a study using intrinsically 15N-labelled proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 87, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, VC (1980) Role of the large intestine in the processes of digestion and absorption in the pig. In Current Concepts of Digestion and Absorption in Pigs , Proceedings of a Seminar held at the National Institute for Research in Dairying, 1979, NIRD technical bulletin no. 3, pp. 112–129 [Low, AG and Partridge, IG, editors]. Reading, UK: National Institute for Research in Dairying.Google Scholar
Mason, VC, Just, A & Bech-Andersen, S (1976) Bacterial activity in the hindgut of pigs. 2. Its influence on the apparent digestibility of nitrogen and amino acids. Zeitschriftt für Tierphysiologie, Tierernahrung und Futtermittelkunde 36, 311–324.Google Scholar
Metges, CC (2000) Contribution of microbial amino acids to amino acid homeostasis of the host. Journal of Nutrition 130, 1857S–1864S.Google Scholar
Millard, P & Chesson, A (1984) Modification to swede ( Brassica napus L.) anterior to the terminal ileum of pigs: some implications for the analysis of dietary fibre. British Journal of Nutrition 52, 583–594.Google Scholar
Millward, DJ, Garlick, PJ, James, WPT, Sender, PM & Waterlow, JC (1976) Protein Turnover. In Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, European Association for Animal Production publication no. 16, pp. 112–129 [Cole, DJA, Boorman, KN, Buttery, PJ, Lewis, DNeal, RJ and H, Swan, editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Moore, WEC, Cato, EP & Holdeman, LV (1978) Some current concepts in intestinal bacteriology. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 31, S33–S42.Google Scholar
Moughan, PJ, Birtles, MJ, Cranwell, PD, Smith, WC & Pedraza, M (1992) The piglet as a model animal for studying aspects of digestion and absorption in milk-fed human infants. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 67, 40–113.Google Scholar
Moughan, PJ, Cranwell, PD, Darragh, AJ & Rowan, AM (1994) The domestic pig as a model animal for studying digestion in humans. In Proceedings of the VIth International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pigs, European Association for Animal Production publication no. 80, pp. 389–396 [Souffrant, WB and Hagemeister, H, editors]. Dummerstorf, Germany: EAAP.Google Scholar
Moughan, PJ, Gall, MPJ & Rutherfurd, SM (1996) Absorption of lysine and deoxyketosyllysine in an early-Maillard browned casein by the growing pig. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44, 1520–1525.Google Scholar
Moughan, PJ & Rutherfurd, SM (1996) A new method for determining digestible reactive lysine in foods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44, 2202–2209.Google Scholar
Moughan, PJ & Smith, WC (1985) Determination and assessment of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients for the growing pig. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 365–370.Google Scholar
Moughan, PJ, Souffrant, WB & Hodgkinson, SM (1998) Physiological approaches to determining gut endogenous amino acid flows in the mammal. Archives of Animal Nutrition 51, 237–252.Google Scholar
Niiyama, M, Deguchi, E, Kagota, K & Namioka, S (1979) Appearance of 15N-labelled intestinal microbial amino acids in the venous blood of the pig colon. American Journal of Veterinary Research 40, 716–718.Google Scholar
Nyachoti, CM, de Lange, CFM, McBride, BW & Schulze, H (1997) Significance of endogenous gut nitrogen losses in the nutrition of growing pigs: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77, 149–163.Google Scholar
Olszewski, A & Buraczewski, S (1978) Absorption of amino acids in isolated pig caecum in situ . Effect of concentration of enzymatic casein hydrolysate on absorption of amino acids. Acta Physiologica Polonica 29, 67–77.Google Scholar
Payne, JW (1975) Transport of peptides in microorganisms. In Peptide Transport in Protein Nutrition, The Frontiers of Biology Series, vol. 37, 283–364 [Matthews, DM and Payne, JW, editors]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Payne, WL, Combs, GF, Kifer, RR & Snyder, DG (1968) Investigation of protein quality – ileal recovery of amino acids. Federation Proceedings 27, 1199–1203.Google Scholar
Reeds, PJ & Beckett, PR (1996) Protein and Amino Acids. In Present Knowledge in Nutrition, 7th ed., pp. 67–86 [Ziegler, EE and Filer, LJ Jr, editors]. Washington, DC: ILSI Press.Google Scholar
Rerat, A (1978) Digestion and absorption of carbohydrates and nitrogenous matters in the hindgut of the omnivorous non ruminant animal. Journal of Animal Science 46, 1808–1837.Google Scholar
Rerat, A (1981) Digestion and absorption of nutrients in the pig. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 37, 229–287.Google Scholar
Robel, EJ & Crane, AB (1972) An accurate method for correcting unknown amino acid losses from protein hydrolysates. Analytical Biochemistry 48, 233–246.Google Scholar
Rowan, AM, Moughan, PJ & Wilson, MN (1992 a) Effect of hydrolysis time on the determination of the amino acid composition of diet, ileal digesta and faeces samples and on the determination of dietary amino acid digestibility coefficients. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 40, 981–985.Google Scholar
Rowan, AM, Moughan, PJ & Wilson, MN (1992 b) The flows of deoxyribonucleic acid and diaminopimelic acid and the digestibility of dietary fibre components at the terminal ileum, as indicators of microbial activity in the upper digestive tract of ileostomised pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 36, 129–141.Google Scholar
Rowan, AM, Moughan, PJ, Wilson, MN, Maher, K, Tasman-Jones, C (1994) Comparison of the ileal and faecal digestibility of dietary amino acids in adult humans and evaluation of the pig as a model animal for digestion studies in man. British Journal of Nutrition 71, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherfurd, SM & Moughan, PJ (1997) Application of a new method for determining digestible reactive lysine to variably heated protein sources. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45, 1582–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherfurd, SM & Moughan, PJ (2000) Developments in the determination of protein and amino acids. In Feed Evaluation, Principles and Practice, pp. 45–56 [Moughan, PJ, Verstegen, MWA and Visser-Reyneveld, MI, editors]. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Pers.Google Scholar
Rutherfurd, SM, Moughan, PJ & Morel, PCH (1997 a) Assessment of the true ileal digestibility of reactive lysine as a predictor of lysine uptake from the small intestine of the growing pig. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45, 4378–4383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherfurd, SM, Moughan, PJ, van Osch,, L (1997 b) Digestible reactive lysine in processed feedstuffs: Application of a new bioassay. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45, 1189–1194.Google Scholar
Sammons, HG (1961) Factors affecting faecal composition – a comparison of ileal discharge and faeces. Biochemistry Journal 80, 30P–31P.Google Scholar
Sandberg, A, Andersson, H, Hallgren, B, Hasselblad, K, Isaksson, B & Hulten, L (1981) Experimental model for in vivo determination of dietary fibre and its effect on the absorption of nutrients in the small intestine. British Journal of Nutrition 45, 283–294.Google Scholar
Sandstrom, B, Andersson, H, Kivisto, B & Sandberg, AS (1986) Apparent small intestinal absorption of nitrogen and minerals from soy and meat-protein based diets. A study on ileostomy subjects. Journal of Nutrition 116, 2209–2218.Google Scholar
Sauer, WC (1976) Factors Affecting Amino Acid Availabilities for Cereal Grains and their Components for Growing Monogastric Animals, PhD thesis, University of Manitoba, Canada.Google Scholar
Sauer, WC & Just, A (1979) Amino acid digestibilities in rations for growing pigs. In Annual Feeders' Day Report, pp. 22–25. Edmonton, Alberta Canada: University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Sauer, WC & Ozimek, L (1986) Digestibility of amino acids in swine: results and their practical application – a review. Livestock Production Science 15, 367–388.Google Scholar
Sauer, WC, Stothers, SC & Parker, RJ (1977) Apparent and true availabilities of amino acids in wheat and milling by-products for growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 57, 775–784.Google Scholar
Schmitz, M, Ahrens, F, Schon, J & Hagemeister, H (1991) Amino acid absorption and its significance for protein supply in the pig. In Proceedings of the Vth International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pigs, pp. 85–87 [Verstegen, MWA, Huisman, J and Hartog den, LA, editors]. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Schneeman, BO (1982) Digestive enzyme activities from the pancreas in response to diet. In Physiologie Digestive Chez Le Porc, pp. 125–131 [Laplace, JP, Corring, T and Rérat, A, editors]. Paris, France: Institute National de La Recherche Agronomique.Google Scholar
Schrimshaw, NS, Wayler, AH, Murray, E, Steinke, FH, Rand, WM & Young, VR (1983) Nitrogen balance in young men given one of two isolated soy proteins or milk protein. Journal of Nutrition 113, 2492–2497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souffrant, WB (1991) Endogenous nitrogen losses during digestion in pigs. In Proceedings of the Vth International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pigs, pp. 147–166 [Verstegen, MWA, Huisman, J and Hartog den, LA, editors]. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Stephen, AM & Cummings, JH (1980) The microbial contribution to human faecal mass. Journal of Medical Microbiology 13, 45–56.Google Scholar
Tanksley, TD & Knabe, DA (1980) Availability of amino acids for swine. In Proceedings of the 1980 Georgia Nutrition Conference for the Feed Industry, pp. 157–168. Atlanta, GA: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Tomé, D & Bos, C (2000) Dietary protein and nitrogen utilisation. Journal of Nutrition 130, 1868S–1873S.Google Scholar
Ugawa, S, Sunouchi, Y, Ueda, T, Takahashi, E, Saishin, Y & Shimada, S (2001) Characterization of a mouse colonic system B (o +) amino acid transporter related to amino acid absorption in colon. American Journal of Physiology 281, G365–G370.Google Scholar
Van Weerden, EJ, Huisman, J, van Leeuwen, P & Slump, P (1985) The sensitivity of the ileal digestibility method as compared to the faecal digestibility method. In Digestive Physiology in the Pig, pp. 392–395 [Just, A, Jorgensen, H and Fernandez, JA, editors]. Copenhagen, Denmark: National Institute of Animal Science.Google Scholar
Vince, A, O'Grady, F & Dawson, AM (1973) The development of ileostomy flora. Journal of Infectious Diseases 128, 638–641.Google Scholar
Wayler, A, Querioz, E, Schrimshaw, NS, Steinke, FH, Rand, WM & Young, VR (1983) Nitrogen balance studies in young men to assess the protein quality of an isolated soy protein in relation to meat proteins. Journal of Nutrition 113, 2485–2491.Google Scholar
Webb, KE Jr (1990) Igntestinal absorption of protein hydrolysis products: a review. Journal of Animal Science 68, 3011–3022.Google Scholar
Williams, AP (1988) Determination of amino acids. In HPLC in Food Analysis, pp. 441–470 [McCrae, R, editor]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williams, AP (1994) Recent developments in amino acid analysis. In Amino Acids in Farm Animal Nutrition, pp. 11–36 [D'Mello, JPF, editor]. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Williams Smith, H (1965) Observations on the flora of alimentary tracts of animals and factors affecting its composition. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 89, 95–122.Google Scholar
Wrong, OJ, Edmonds, CJ & Chadwick, VS (1981) The Large Intestine: Its Role in Mammalian Nutrition and Homeostasis. Lancaster, UK: MTP Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Wunsche, J, Hennig, U, Meinl, M, Kreienbring, F & Bock, HD (1982) Investigations of the absorption and utilisation of amino acids infused into the caecum of growing pigs. 1. N-balance measuring with regard to the utilisation of lysine and isoleucine and the isoleucine requirement of growing pigs. Archives für Tierernahrung 32, 337–348.Google Scholar
Wykes, LJ, Fiorotto, M, Burrin, DG, Del Rosario, M, Frazer, ME, Pond, WG & Jahoor, F (1996) Chronic low protein intake reduces tissue protein synthesis in a pig model of protein malnutrition. Journal of Nutrition 126, 1481–1488.Google Scholar
Young, VR, Puig, M, Queiroz, E, Schrimshaw, NS & Rand%, WM (1984) Evaluation of the protein quality of an isolated soy protein in young men: relative nitrogen requirements and effect of methionine supplementation. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 39, 16–24.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T (1973) Influence of dietary protein source on the rate of digestion in the small intestine of pigs. Part II. The rate of protein digestion and amino acid absorption. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych 95B, 135–155.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T (1975) The apparent digestibility of nitrogen and individual amino acids in the large intestine of pigs. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych 97B, 117–123.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T (1978) Determination of available amino acids in feedstuffs for monogastrics. Feedstuffs 50(53), 15–17;43–44.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T (1980) Protein digestion and absorption in the stomach and the small intestine of pigs. In Current Concepts of Digestion and Absorption in the Pig, pp. 52–65 [Low, AG and Partridge, IG, editors]. Reading, UK: NIRD.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T, Low, AG & Zebrowska, H (1983) Studies on gastric digestion of protein and carbohydrate, gastric secretion and exocrine pancreatic secretion in the growing pig. British Journal of Nutrition 49, 401–410.Google Scholar