Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:12:06.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

More-and-Less-Than: Liveness, Video Recording, and the Future of Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Denise Varney  and
Rachel Fensham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the spread of digital and other modes of electronic recordings into the auditoria and lecture theatres where performance is studied, the debate about the video documentation of performance – already well rehearsed and in the pages of NTQ – is about to intensify. Rachel Fensham and Denise Varney have based the article which follows on their own work in videoing live theatre pieces for research into feminist performance. This article deliberates on their experience with the medium and examines the anxieties that surface at the point of implosion between live and mediatized performance. The first part locates these anxieties in the question of presence and absence in performance – especially that of the performer, whose body and self are both at stake in the recorded image. In the second part, the authors offer a description of viewing practices, which they present as a model of ‘videocy’. Rachel Fensham is Senior Lecturer in the Centre for Drama and Theatre Studies, Monash University, and Denise Varney is Lecturer in the School of Studies in Creative Arts, Victorian College of the Arts, University of Melbourne.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Theatre Quarterly , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 2000 , pp. 88 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1. Derrida, Jacques, trans. Bass, A, Writing and Difference (London: Routledge, 1978), p. 235Google Scholar.

2. Phelan, Peggy, Unmarked: the Politics of Performance (London: Routledge, 1993), p. 146CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. Fensham, Rachel and Varney, Denise, ‘Documenting and Disseminating Performing Arts Research’, in Richards, Alison, O'Brien, Angela, eds., Proceedings of the National Symposium on Research in the Performing Arts (Melbourne: School of Studies in Creative Arts, 1998)Google Scholar.

4. Melzer, Annabelle, ‘“Best Betrayal”: the Documentation of Performance on Video and Film, Part 1’, New Theatre Quarterly, XI, No. 42 (05 1995), p. 150Google Scholar.

5. Pavis, Patrice, ‘From Theatre to Film: Selecting a Methodology for Analysis. On Marat/Sade by Weiss, P., Brook, P.’, in Martin, Jacqueline, Sauter, Willmar, eds., Understanding Theatre: Performance Analysis in Theory and Practice (Almqvist and Wiksell, 1995)Google Scholar.

6. Auslander, Phillip, ‘Liveness: Performance and the Anxiety of Simulation’, in Diamond, Elin, ed., Performance and Cultural Politics (London: Routledge, 1996), p. 203Google Scholar.

7. McAuley, Gay, ‘The Visual Documentation of Theatrical Performance’, New Theatre Quarterly, X, No. 38 (05 1994), p. 192Google Scholar.

8. Elam, Keir, The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama (London: Methuen, 1980), p. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9. Barba, Eugenio, trans. Fowler, R., ‘Four Spectators’, The Drama Review XXXIV, No. 1 (Spring 1990), p. 96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. Copeland, Roger, ‘The Presence of Mediation’, Drama Review, XXXIV, No. 4 (Winter 1990), p. 42Google Scholar.

11. Auslander, Philip, ‘Legally Live: Performance in / of the Law’, The Drama Review, XLI, No. 2 (Summer, 1997), p. 16Google Scholar.

12. Auslander, 1996, op. cit., p. 203.

13. Derrida, op. cit., p. 249.

14. Fuchs, Elinor, The Death of Character: Perspectives on Theatre after Modernism (Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indianapolis University Press, 1996), p. 72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15. Auslander, Philip, ‘Just Be Your Self’, in Zarrilli, Philip, ed., Action (Re) Considered (London: Routledge, 1995), p. 66Google Scholar.

16. Auslander, Philip, From Acting to Performance (London: Routledge, 1997), p. 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. Ibid., p. 28.

18. Esslin, Martin, The Field of Drama (London: Methuen, 1988), p. 56Google Scholar.

19. Fische-Lichte, Erika, ‘Performance Art and Ritual: Bodies in Performance’, in Theatre Research International, XXII, No. 1 (Spring 1997), p. 22–37Google Scholar.

20. Ulmer, Gregory, Teletheory: Grammatology in the Age of Video (London: Routledge, 1989), p. 63Google Scholar.

21. Ibid.

22. McHoul, Alec and Niall, Lucy, ‘That Film, This Paper – Its Body’, Southern Review, XXVII, No. 3 (1994), p. 303–22Google Scholar.

23. Fensham, Rachel and Varney, Denise, ‘“Help Me, I'm Drowning!” Calls the Man in Jenny Kemp's The Black Sequin Dress: Heterosexual Masculinity in Feminist Performance’, Australian Drama Studies, No. 34 (04 1999)Google Scholar.

24. Kemp, letter to authors, 29 April 1999.

25. McAuley, op. cit., p. 183.

26. See Dixon, Steve, ‘Digits, Discourse, and Documentation: Performance Research and Hypermedia’, The Drama Review, XLIII, No. 1 (Spring 1999)Google Scholar.