^{page 433 note 1} Wellhausen, J., Das Evangelium Lucae (Berlin, 1904), p. 83.Google Scholar

^{page 433 note 2} Loisy, Alfred, L'Évangile selon Luc (Paris, 1924), pp. 402 f.Google Scholar

^{page 433 note 3} Jülicher, Adolf, Die Gleichnisreden Jesu (Tübingen, 1910), II, 360 f.Google Scholar

^{page 433 note 4} Bultmann, Rudolf, History of the Synoptic Tradition (Oxford, 1963), trans. Marsh, John, p.196.Google Scholar

^{page 433 note 5} Jeremias, Joachim, The Parables of Jesus (New York, 1963), trans. Hooke, S. H., pp. 128–31.Google Scholar

^{page 433 note 6} ibid. p. 131.

^{page 433 note 7} ibid. pp. 63–6.

^{page 434 note 1} Jeremias, op. cit., pp. 37 f.

^{page 434 note 2} Jülicher, op. cit. p. 638.

^{page 434 note 3} Montefiore, C. G., The Synoptic Gospels, 2nd ed. (London, 1927), II, 539.Google Scholar

^{page 434 note 4} Bultmann, op. cit. pp. 196 f.

^{page 434 note 5} Jeremias, op. cit. p. 186.

^{page 435 note 1} Schweizer, Eduard, ‘Zur Frage der Lukasquellen, Analyse von Luk. 15, 11–32’, Th. Z. IV (1948), 469–71;Google ScholarJeremias, , ‘Zum Gleichnis vom verlorenen Sohn, Luk. 15, 11–32’, Th. Z. v (1949),228–31;Google ScholarSchweizer, , ‘Antwort’, Th. Z. v (1949), 231–3.Google Scholar

^{page 435 note 2} Schweizer, , ‘Antwort’, p. 232,Google Scholar questions that the last is a Semitism, on the grounds that it falls at the first of the clause rather than in the middle, hence meaning merely ‘see’.

^{page 436 note 1} Evidence: Moulton & Geden and Hawkins.

^{page 436 note 2} Of the four occurrences in the Gospel, one is from Mark and the other three are in our parable.

^{page 437 note 1} Schweizer, , ‘Antwort’, pp. 232 f.Google Scholar