Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
page 318 note 1 Harris, J. Rendel, Testimonies (Cambridge), I, 1916,Google ScholarHarris, J. Rendel, Testimonies (Cambridge), II, 1920Google Scholar; Dodd, C. H., According to the Scriptures: The Sub-structure of New Testament Theology (London, 1952)Google Scholar; Lindars, B., New Testament Apologetic (London, 1961).Google Scholar
page 318 note 2 In Beiträge zur Geschichte der biblischen Exegese, n. 7 (Tübingen, 1968).Google Scholar
page 319 note 1 Stendahl, K., The School of St Matthew and its Use of the Old Testament (Lund, 1968)Google Scholar; McConnell, R. S., Law and Prophecy in Matthew's Gospel, the Authority and Use of the O.T. in the Gospel of St Matthew (Basel, 1969)Google Scholar; Suhl, A., Die Funktion der alttestamentlichen Zitate und Anspielungen im Markusevangelium (Gütersloh, 1965)Google Scholar; Resc, M., Alttestamentliche Motive in der Christologie des Lukas (Gütersloh, 1965)Google Scholar; Freed, E. D., O.T. Quotations in the Gospel of John (Leiden, 1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ellis, E. Earle, Paul's Use of the Old Testament (London, 1957)Google Scholar; Schröger, F., Der Verfasser des Hebräerbriefs als Schriftausleger (Regensburg, 1968).Google Scholar
page 319 note 2 See bibliography in Bowker, J., The Targums and Rabbinic Literature (Cambridge, 1969), pp. 326–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and in S. Jellicoe's standard work on the Septuagint.
page 319 note 3 Grech, P., ‘Interprophetic Re-interpretation and Old Testament Eschatology’ in Augustinianum, IX (1969), 235–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 319 note 4 Cf. for example, the conclusions of Amsler, S., L' Ancien Testament dans l' Église (Neuchatel, 1960), pp. 93–9.Google Scholar
page 320 note 1 Cf., as regards Paul, E. Earle Ellis, op. cit., appendix 11 and p. 187.
page 320 note 2 B. Lindars, op. cit. pp. 24–31.
page 320 note 3 McConnell, op. cit. pp. 135 f., quoting Strecker and Stendahl.
page 321 note 1 Op. cit. pp. 137 ff.
page 321 note 2 Cf. Freed, op. cit. pp. 117 ff.
page 321 note 3 E. Earle Ellis, makes this important distinction on pp. 25 ff.
page 321 note 4 Th.W.z.A.T., col. 353.
page 322 note 1 Unterwegs zur Sprache (Pfüllingen, 1959), p. 252.Google Scholar
page 322 note 2 Ibid. p. 267; originally in Brief über den Humanismus (1947).
page 322 note 3 Offene Fragen zur Formgeschichte des Evangeliums (München, 1970), pp. 143–50.Google Scholar
page 322 note 4 Cf. synthesis and bibliography in Achtemeier, P. J., An Introduction to the New Hermeneutic (Philadelphia, 1969)Google Scholar as well as Robinson, and Cobb, , The New Hermeneutic (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
page 322 note 5 Fr. Schleiermacher, D. E., ‘Hermeneutik’, nach der Handschriften neu herausgegeben und eingeleitel von Heinz Kimmerle (Heidelberg, 1959).Google Scholar
page 322 note 6 Dilthey, W., Die Entstehung der Hermeneutik, Gesammelte Schriften, v (Göttingen, 1924).Google Scholar
page 323 note 1 Cf. for example, Geschichte und Eschatologie (Tübingen, 1964 2)Google Scholar, as well as Schmithals', W. excellent synthesis of Bultmann's theology in Die Theologie Rudolf Bultmanns (Tübingen, 1966).Google Scholar
page 323 note 2 Gadamer, H. -G., Wahrheit und Methode (Tübingen, 1965Google Scholar2); Le problème de la conscience historique (Paris–Louvain, 1963)Google Scholar, especially the concluding chapter.
page 323 note 3 Pannenberg, W., ‘Hermeneutik und Universalgeschichte’, in Z.Th.K. LX (1963), 90–121.Google Scholar
page 324 note 1 See a very good account of the discussion in the article ‘Hermeneutics’ (Brown, R.) in The Jerome Biblical Commentary (London, 1968), pp. 605–23Google Scholar, with relative bibliography.