Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:45:35.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reconsideration of the Context of Maranatha

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

C. F. D. Moule
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Studies
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , July 1960 , pp. 307 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 307 note 1 see Hofmann, K. M., Philema Hagion (1938); A. J. B. Higgins, The Lord's Supper in the New Testament (1952), p. 60; O. Cullmann, Early Christian Worship (1950, English trans. 1953), p. 13; J. A. T. Robinson, ‘Traces of a Liturgical Sequence in I Cor. xvi. 20–24’, J.T.S. n.s. IV, I (April 1953), pp. 38 ff.; N. Clark, An Approach to the Theology of the Sacraments (1956), p. 70.Google Scholar

page 307 note 2 Cf. Lietzmann, H., Messe und Herrenmahl (1926), pp. 236 ff.Google Scholar

page 307 note 3 See Seeberg, R. in Religion und Geschichte I (1906), pp. 118 ff. (‘Kuβ und Kanon’); H. Lietzmann, op. Cit. p. 229; J. A. T. Robinson, loc. cit.Google Scholar

page 307 note 4 The alleged traces in Rom. xv, alluded to by J. A. T. Robinson, loc. cit., are inconclusive.

page 307 note 5 See, besides Lietzmann, op. cit., M. Dibelius, ‘Die Mahlgebete der Didache’, Z.N.T.W. xxxvii (1938), pp. 40 ff.; G. Bornkamm, see below; J.P. Audet, La Didaché (1958), p. 415.

page 307 note 6 And cf. W. Bousset's Herr ist Jesus, p. 22 (cited by Peterson, loc. cit., as having been retracted by Bousset in his later Kyrios Christos, p. 84).

page 308 note 1 S.-B. in loc. (III, p.494) allude to the ingenious suggestion (whose?) that maranatha is an interpretation of anathema along the lines of analysing the rabbinic word (‘ban’) as ‘the Name [of Yaweh] comes’. But they note that this cannot be substantiated from rabbinic writings.

page 308 note 2 Zur Einführung in das Wörterbuch zum N.Y. (Coniectanea Neotestamentica, xv (1955)), p. 26 (printed as the introduction to Arndt and Gingrich's version of Bauer).Google Scholar

page 308 note 3 It is perhaps significant that Peterson, op. cit.p. 233 (in a different context) is able to cite, from a Coptic amulet, an amen and a ταχú ταχú in juxtaposition.

page 309 note 1 In T.W.N.T. iv, pp. 470 ff.Google Scholar

page 309 note 2 ‘Das Anathema in der urchristlichen Abendmahlsliturgie’, Theol. Literaturz. LXXV (1950), 4/5, pp. 227 ff., reprinted (in a revised form) in Das Ende des Gesetzes (1952), pp. 123 ff.Google Scholar