Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:19:57.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the Gothic Bible

Gotica Veronensia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

G. W. S. Friedrichsen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Veronese manuscript LI (49) includes twenty-four homilies by the Arian Bishop Maximinus. Most of these were furnished with marginal notes in Gothic, said to be contemporary with the Latin text of the fifth/sixth century, giving a brief indication of the subject of the homily. Twelve of these marginals are still more or less legible.

Type
Short Studies
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , October 1962 , pp. 39 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See also Turner, C. H. in J.T.S. XX (1919), 289–92, and XXIV (1922), 71–9.Google Scholar

2 Qino leikinoda=mulier sanitur (the same verb-form also represents the pret. active). Cf. Horn. XXIV.

1 New Testament Studies, vol. VIII, no. I (10 1961).Google Scholar

2 Bennett, W. H., The Gothk Commentary on the Gospel of John (Modern Language Association of America, 1961).Google Scholar

3 Viz., brinnan, hwssopo, kalbo, Markaitlius, rau, bs, Sabaillius, wiftrus, wulla.

1 This form has been much debated. See my note in N.T.S., toe. cit., and Bennett, , op. cit. 7, 18.Google Scholar

1 The renderings of the same particles in the Gospels and the Epistles are ‘treated in the third of my Cothic Studier (Blackwell, 1961).Google Scholar

1 See my retroversion into Greek of Skeireins I–IV in New Testament Studies, VIII (10 1961), 43–56.Google Scholar

1 The double renderings in 8, 29, 37 and 58 are not included in this account.

1 New Testament Studies, VIII, I (10 1961), 43–56.Google Scholar

1 That is, if liugandans=m ntintes; but if, as seems likely, it = errantss, then ψευσθήντες, of which liugandans would be an erroneous rendering. One might have expected afairzjai, as in Maik, xii. 24 διό πΛανãσθε: airzjai sijup: erratis.Google Scholar