Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:46:10.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Der Einsetzungsbericht, Lk 22, 19–20. Zweiter Teil einer quellenkritischen Untersuchung des Lukanischen Abendmahlberichtes, Lk 22, 7–38. Neutestamentliche Abhandlungen, XX. Band, 4. Heft. By Heinz Schürmann. Münster: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandlung. 1955. Pp. xii + 153. DM. 10.80. - Jesu Abschiedsrede, Lk 22, 21–38. Dritter Teil einer quellenkritischen Untersuchung des Lukanischen Abendmahlberichtes, Lk 22, 7–38. Neutestamentliche Abhandlungen, XX. Band, 5. Heft. By Heinz Schürmann. Münster: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandlung. 1957. Pp. xi + 160. DM. 11.80.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Paul Winter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , April 1958 , pp. 223 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 224 note 1 I deliberately refrain from offering counter-arguments. Whether it will ever be possible to disentangle the various strands of traditions that are combined in each of the Passion Stories of the four Gospels is doubtful. Already the relatively simplest part of these stories, the Pacchamahtbericht, is of complex structure both in Luke and in Mark. For Luke, this has been proved by Schürmann in the first part of his work. As regards Mark, one might compare the following appellations used in vv. 10–11 and 17–21 on the one hand and vv. 12–16 on the other:Google Scholar

page 224 note 2 See the same' writer's ‘Das Abendmahl eine Vergegenwärtigung des Todes Jesu oder ein eschatologisches Freudenmahl?’, Theoiogische Zeitschrift, II (1946), 81 ff.Google Scholar

page 226 note 2 ‘Sources of the Lucan Passion Narrative’, The Expository Times (December 1956).Google Scholar