^{page 171 note 1} Furneaux, The Other Side of the Story, p. 183.Google Scholar

^{page 171 note 2} Matt. v. 17–20; X. 5, 6; xiii. 2, 3.Google Scholar

^{page 172 note 1} I have not discussed Paul and Paulinism in this paper, but Bultmann's analysis of the theology of Paul reverses Guignebert's thesis. W. David Stacey in his study of The Pauline View of Man shows clearly that its distinctive features derive from the character and experience of the apostle, not from his Jewish inheritance or his Hellenistic environment.Google Scholar

^{page 173 note 1} History in a Changing World, pp. 183–4.Google Scholar

^{page 173 note 2} Theology of the New Testament, 1, pp. 34–5.Google Scholar

^{page 174 note 1} Montefiore, Synopti Gospels, in loc. Matthew xi. 19.Google Scholar

^{page 175 note 1} Guignebert, Jesus, p. 275.Google Scholar

^{page 175 note 2} Jeremias, J., The Parables of Jesus. E.T. p. 100.Google Scholar

^{page 178 note 1} Bultmann, Theology of the New Testament, 11, p. 69.Google Scholar

^{page 178 note 2} Ibid..

^{page 179 note 1} It is worth noting that Theodore Gaster, in his list of coincidences of phrase in the Scrolls and the gospels, gives twenty references to John as compared with nineteen in all to the Synoptics. It would seem that the Fourth Gospel is at least as closely linked with Palestinian Judaism of the first century A.D. as the Synoptics are.Google Scholar

^{page 179 note 2} Op. cit. p. 23.Google Scholar

^{page 180 note 1} Op. cit. pp. 23–4.Google Scholar

^{page 181 note 1} Op. cit. p. 57.Google Scholar

^{page 181 note 2} Cf.Dodd, C. H., The Fourth Gospel, p. 364.Google Scholar

^{page 182 note 1} Op. cit. 11, p. 89.Google Scholar